Subject: bug#4719: closed (Re: bug#4719: 23.1; M-& to run commands asynchronously (async-shell-command))

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:23:03 +0000

Your bug report

#4719: 23.1; M-& to run commands asynchronously (async-shell-command)

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
4719: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4719
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#4719: 23.1; M-& to run commands asynchronously (async-shell-command)
From: Juri Linkov <[email-masked]>
To: Chong Yidong <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 03:04:12 +0300
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

>> So I propose a minimal change that just removes the current annoyance
>> where async-shell-command asks to kill the buffer instead of doing
>> something more constructive like creating a new buffer for running
>> another asynchronous command.
>>
>> This is implemented in the patch below.
>
> Patch looks fine to me.

Installed and closed.

Subject: 23.1; M-& to run commands asynchronously (async-shell-command)
From: Daniel Clemente <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:10:19 -0700 (PDT)

I propose to add a new function, async-shell-command, bound to M-&, which in analogous to shell-command (bound to M-!) but executes the command in the background (as if you had written an ampersand at the end of M-!).
Both functions would respectively correspond to keys ! and & in dired, only that ! and & work only in dired but M-! and M-& would be global (work everywhere).

The code is in this message in an old thread:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/111825

There are still some details to decide: how many buffers to open, where to direct STDOUT, whether output should be visible, …

Some modes should be checked since they might be using M-&.