GNU bug report logs - #47171
[PATCH 00/10] Move some Bioconductor packages to (gnu packages bioconductor).

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:08:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #54 received at 47171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 47171 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: bug#47171: [PATCH 00/10] Move some Bioconductor packages to (gnu
 packages bioconductor).
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:30:53 +0100
Hi,

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 14:20, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
> zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Well, thanks for the report and I confirm that adding the bioconductor
> > import in cran fixes "guix pull".   But in my memories, this import
> > was adding circular dependency.  Ricardo, WDYT?
>
> The point of having (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor)
> be separate modules is to separate independent packages.
>
> I’d like to keep it that way and not let (gnu packages cran) depend on
> (gnu packages bioconductor).

Therefore, the fix is to move the CRAN r-bisquerna and r-absfiltergsea
packages from (gnu packages cran) to (gnu packages bioconductor)
because they depend on the Bioconductor package r-biobase (and
r-limma).  Right?
How do I proceed?  Submit a patch moving these 2 packages and then
another patch reverting the revert?

Thanks,
simon




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 111 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.