GNU bug report logs - #47150
28.0.50; Incorrect major-mode in minibuffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: "47150 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <47150 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>, Sheng Yang <styang <at> fastmail.com>
Subject: bug#47150: [External] : bug#47150: 28.0.50; Incorrect major-mode in minibuffer
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:11:19 -0400

>> So a minibuffer isn't affected by what happened in its previous invocation.
> Can you give a quick example?  I don't think I've
> ever noticed a minibuffer affected by what happened
> in a previous invocation.

Those problems have mostly been fixed indirectly by the introduction of
`minibuffer-inactive-mode`, which happened to kill the local variables
at the end of an activation.

Before that (i.e. in Emacs<24) there were cases where
`indent-line-function` was "inherited" from one minibuffer to the next.

The remaining problems (that is, until Alan fixed it by re-instating
fundamental-mode upon activation of a minibuffer) were those of an active
minibuffer inheriting the settings from `minibuffer-inactive-mode`.

> I thought you were saying it would be cleaner for _users_.
> My question was/is how it would be cleaner for users.

I don't think this should affect users either way (except indirectly by
the likelihood of lingering corner case bugs).

> Can I ask what's wrong with what I suggested: One mode, not two; just
> change the name and provide a helpful doc-string that covers both
> active and inactive?

What's the benefit?  Have you tried to implement it?


        Stefan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.