From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:12:15 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#47125 <47125@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#47125 <47125@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid Reply-To: bug#47125 <47125@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 19:12:15 +0000 retitle 47125 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid reassign 47125 emacs submitter 47125 Pip Cet severity 47125 normal tag 47125 patch fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 13 16:38:57 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 21:38:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLByL-0000XB-6G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:38:57 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLByJ-0000X3-09 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:38:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLByI-0003OQ-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:38:54 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]:38450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLByH-0007Mj-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:38:54 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v192so23115093oia.5 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:38:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vqyp7+c5ZlS0w9lwJxeRkpF79xrNZMYTT25VCDs/b84=; b=lcf62bb/fERoZR57a6dz5NaIgnWB7lpdRlP40tpvYRsoyxkn7jdVNeL7yvUzmlyOWj ojlBYumREbwaQIhan5/hrL2e39TYdzH4+7tcud+dB69d9foSQ4xd2VxdHduX4Li36l39 qcC9Xtzo5ei+hdy9LLaU01tNEoBV1NQF3OwWyQUcHmWjRqOiEB1G3XTp4cXZVHiYnqtS kawh1I+Ehvc4JcPd2lCMEbJNoPiRtUvIK4X+XssgCc6A5E0pVJiSuKr73ND4X88J3p2O uVyPVlNc//3x9wXt4YbGMowooGMVBbsuS1dNGe8+HxrBEWtTrvqV0kX98g6GClWD5JhJ ipiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vqyp7+c5ZlS0w9lwJxeRkpF79xrNZMYTT25VCDs/b84=; b=LeX63Anzid4Lrtl2k9+dIunynovzsDJl4Y3uJU17UKN99J9VDhp84vebEHAitfYFRI NlURuwxInS9P94vMLNZV3WHA3mBIQZzEiCBgefUPkc8is2ubrdBTnSmkbL59UgtlKT0r jp/bV0lldduHdW5vzztb/PtsaEKAjGt8U0Rx67ihL3qH/jWz9mp7Jj44uiUmlRcrYFfP 0lL2zwtc6SxRGvJV4hrz+ZEfASvneoB9OFA+6HiLA1ZaE0uFbuBeC0jshGF9GSE74a5J GTzzlwkWxA7dBt3xZmgIJu71l/ZWRocCy7wHHL8bDbQ19xIk2pzedycK+Gkrj3SmS41o 1/2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532SzBIJNinU63GQPATidRvSbKJEnAgAV+EvvUewatnzscE0jHNA oeGjzA5X4OHaiFn5YfKgZ80+j6556I+KOkDXfpS4kJRz4LQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyADEcf85yo8wGvEe66zeKSEQHY1yt5ICxEM6NUcn5qk3R9zmlnVheIqBM0pC6dHQC89IK5nDlVpRGQtPFAtts= X-Received: by 2002:aca:4c0f:: with SMTP id z15mr14255294oia.44.1615671532335; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:38:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pip Cet Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:38:16 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c; envelope-from=pipcet@gmail.com; helo=mail-oi1-x22c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) I'm running Debian GNU/Linux (the Linux part is not provided by Debian) on an Apple M1-based machine. This currently involves running a kernel compiled with a 16 KB page size (the only fully functional kernel is currently available as a binary as recompilation of the alleged source fails to produce a fully working kernel). The Debian-packaged Emacs version does not start. Compiling from scratch works fine. After some investigation, this is because pdumper assumes that an address aligned according to the page size at build time is sufficiently aligned for mmap to work with the MAP_FIXED flag, when it comes to loading the dump. That's not true because the Debian Emacs was apparently built with a 4 KB page size, so it will not run on a system with a 16 KB page size. I've confirmed that I get the same error on current master if I modify getpagesize to return 4096 rather than the correct value. I think it would be best to handle this case gracefully, and I thought pdumper already did that, but it appears to simply fail. There are good reasons for increasing the page size, so this is likely to happen more often and on other architectures with varying page sizes. We're currently enforcing a page size of 64 KB on Windows, so maybe it already has. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 14 00:37:08 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 05:37:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32788 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJR6-0005SS-Az for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:37:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51032) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJR4-0005S3-GD for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:37:07 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJQy-0003jo-8m; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:37:00 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4052 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJQx-00015t-IO; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:37:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:37:07 +0200 Message-Id: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pip Cet In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:38:16 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid References: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: Daniel Colascione , 47125@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:38:16 +0000 > > I'm running Debian GNU/Linux (the Linux part is not provided by > Debian) on an Apple M1-based machine. This currently involves running > a kernel compiled with a 16 KB page size (the only fully functional > kernel is currently available as a binary as recompilation of the > alleged source fails to produce a fully working kernel). > > The Debian-packaged Emacs version does not start. Compiling from > scratch works fine. > > After some investigation, this is because pdumper assumes that an > address aligned according to the page size at build time is > sufficiently aligned for mmap to work with the MAP_FIXED flag, when it > comes to loading the dump. That's not true because the Debian Emacs > was apparently built with a 4 KB page size, so it will not run on a > system with a 16 KB page size. > > I've confirmed that I get the same error on current master if I modify > getpagesize to return 4096 rather than the correct value. > > I think it would be best to handle this case gracefully, and I thought > pdumper already did that, but it appears to simply fail. > > There are good reasons for increasing the page size, so this is likely > to happen more often and on other architectures with varying page > sizes. CC'ing Daniel, in case he has comments and/or suggestions. > We're currently enforcing a page size of 64 KB on Windows We do? can you point me to the code which does that? > so maybe it already has. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 14 00:43:12 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 05:43:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJWy-0005bx-CD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:43:12 -0500 Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:34818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJWw-0005bl-GB for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:43:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ifSFlk7dqBsbhLz2hCl4BCSXy0CHQHW34M4zYW385dk=; b=QKl50hW2PKm6LRbfxs1TxgMu28 gSKIBXUwPg6j0GzWSupjdyAWRny39aZGZS4ao43y+GJjJ16Ksi58l/phCQzrSYt/9IMqpOzQX3ouz yo/VXIZTh2CBUrLneVXCUNYV1lrn3f5KHv0c5DyYZrE+QJvgssa1VqyeCN0bl81WeCKyRjKSC06oC m0FEEN6Fm4Uq6H0AmuSJhzgxtONg8MuJWRtHW/mprM8x92ojtevVG+847I4Pvht2ybjK7pycSToyO Ftsm6ZQg++HuD5k7LrHQve2w4KZPIIrd9oxHIbPfcgdOBnEmIO7/GU0ZHPPyWOCmS7JMRgMEDbfn+ mLMIcNtg==; Received: from [2604:4080:1321:8090:308c:1c2:a8b0:a941] (port=46136) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1lLJWu-0003Kh-Ph; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:43:08 -0800 Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid To: Eli Zaretskii , Pip Cet References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Daniel Colascione Message-ID: <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:43:07 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: 47125@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 3/13/21 9:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Pip Cet >> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:38:16 +0000 >> >> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux (the Linux part is not provided by >> Debian) on an Apple M1-based machine. This currently involves running >> a kernel compiled with a 16 KB page size (the only fully functional >> kernel is currently available as a binary as recompilation of the >> alleged source fails to produce a fully working kernel). >> >> The Debian-packaged Emacs version does not start. Compiling from >> scratch works fine. >> >> After some investigation, this is because pdumper assumes that an >> address aligned according to the page size at build time is >> sufficiently aligned for mmap to work with the MAP_FIXED flag, when it >> comes to loading the dump. That's not true because the Debian Emacs >> was apparently built with a 4 KB page size, so it will not run on a >> system with a 16 KB page size. >> >> I've confirmed that I get the same error on current master if I modify >> getpagesize to return 4096 rather than the correct value. >> >> I think it would be best to handle this case gracefully, and I thought >> pdumper already did that, but it appears to simply fail. >> >> There are good reasons for increasing the page size, so this is likely >> to happen more often and on other architectures with varying page >> sizes. > CC'ing Daniel, in case he has comments and/or suggestions. We should modify this function to do what the doc comment says then. :-) I'm not sure if there's any reliable way to know what the worst case allocation granularity actually is: a quick grep through /usr/include didn't turn up anything. Maybe we should just use a minimum of 16kB here? It's not as if we'd be wasting a ton of RAM doing so. /* Worst-case allocation granularity on any system that might load    this dump.  */ static int dump_get_page_size (void) { #if defined (WINDOWSNT) || defined (CYGWIN)   return 64 * 1024;  /* Worst-case allocation granularity.  */ #else   return getpagesize (); #endif } From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 14 03:34:46 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 07:34:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLGv-0000Gr-Os for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:34:45 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:50295) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLGs-0000Gh-00 for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:34:44 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dyrss1PjYz1qs04; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:34:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dyrsr5j94z1qqkQ; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:34:40 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zo6rIQBQomNk; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:34:40 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: u88SkQhiDI3Y0uY3XhENtwEqB5/4KdmT8GWw4/6HBxRNNaR0hUqjMNAX5h9pcFiH Received: from hase.home (ppp-46-244-178-11.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.178.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:34:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by hase.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C405102A84; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:34:39 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Daniel Colascione Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> X-Yow: I'll take ROAST BEEF if you're out of LAMB!! Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:34:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:43:07 -0800") Message-ID: <878s6q429c.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 47125@debbugs.gnu.org, Pip Cet X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) On Mär 13 2021, Daniel Colascione wrote: > Maybe we should just use a minimum of 16kB here? 64kB would be better. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 14 03:36:34 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 07:36:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32890 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLIg-0000Jp-4s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:34 -0400 Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:36538) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLId-0000Jd-1R for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:36:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nGcWWMEhlxOfB0T7HbIwju3EBB/MLUnGFYise/Y4qzM=; b=js0bK776V6S2FwVw5h4xICFtKM nO0uCurRhbHdIgfW2TAOaTMEamq/qirDdC+vJS8TCbqk8PPG5Ggj4QAZoW5wqExmg0aI0LOrqSdRo 8/+j5cCyjLL1kQ3Y5x7HTbQInSrjrE1KoAwUdAKMUiMbFjDBKcvU/X6XWI4txXnk6VbtEDNXPuHZG o7Up4zneSSvVjkYAcVP6hJRzRgd7PpDn2p3tTY+WVoDUTh9sDW2ybO6TEhDUlO5AH8Zgt8eq1Gn73 nnxg1rXqiQH7DXA6963SCvyK2ey7AeNzaMjibjz3hhiTwa5fiH1+77wT8E9palFdYkDHbLYUCvGqi IFRkRiYw==; Received: from [2604:4080:1321:8090:308c:1c2:a8b0:a941] (port=47254) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLIa-0005EJ-6R; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:36:28 -0800 Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid To: Andreas Schwab References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> <878s6q429c.fsf@linux-m68k.org> From: Daniel Colascione Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 23:36:27 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878s6q429c.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 47125@debbugs.gnu.org, Pip Cet X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 3/13/21 11:34 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Mär 13 2021, Daniel Colascione wrote: > >> Maybe we should just use a minimum of 16kB here? > 64kB would be better. Sure. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 14 04:17:05 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2021 08:17:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLvt-0001Hy-L6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:17:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]:40686) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lLLvr-0001HR-OF for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:17:04 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 101-20020a9d04ee0000b02901b506659320so3629504otm.7 for <47125@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:17:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CcmlKpw0SXE0TlMjJT+8zGk4oYRetIkwl2CeiEJ20Zo=; b=Ogq6pcwLt5qzZFodpMNd/EwZHg5UFiuioRhmUlc6DIyqv1dlMyPNML7GsG9fcrnZuf BNLybHGnN0c05aNoUPW/sE7Ml3qwPLZtMZlPZj0/sGGbcWvwTRbKRwEhHx2FGNloPV/1 KsAp/1jpG61tdnHam8KhWrYBluhAPPxeoW9k8WjhiEnhJehpHW934XbtU7rPndAh9hmb UTX4FQxxWN40JjwEAc7ggMvfq2DcBIjwWUvC/Wi+TgJCMZFrrO4DizXW8ohbSADyzbS0 AP+p+4XNmPekknfebk0nskhsb7qcdIRsLvMZ8uFJ2tcbMHusgsH0BjNvHnh2lXly3eKO Qdkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CcmlKpw0SXE0TlMjJT+8zGk4oYRetIkwl2CeiEJ20Zo=; b=FPix0/ydVy21v/27fIay23fVAkQEI2f8Af6aXyxoZRNX6KVMT0ISr+o0JS51oYZ3NE Ve+FcHFtkWlciSewsprONgvmPjfbsf2jMyIxuE6k3saVEz+vcuCaZvnDlLJ7SIx71QjV 1UdWhoPqWWBGsjJxJ7EzngMtAMrLEby0qWd+XNrHcLb6thRVK0lMeWIr4S1jEWRYwV1J tExPdiamh80+ZwJeJ4zEvb+RNHbMT6uzwBhRYd9vmaqKV2VTgeGcfdgtt8ip5WJh3v07 z8P5Z8fsvFnaoQrIGXNgtSQUEQBXJMAKDOQq6gj/YwZuTa8HD1Jvit2X7rlr2nSLQp5w GJog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PgHfyCyyHpRBAxaVPHIoQmC5MwZ+grwMaN5tgDG/KwMoInZWe BVLw55Zj2lPB8yxmywYmXKKBK3CzDk70MeZHp3E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwx76+7rQ12FRpAAvWQ7bCYUu8I694oavunsitqNaOt9Zule9pLPqGDnsDE0ly8ErAsdWvT1M1WJJJ29VfHi8o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1011:: with SMTP id a17mr9910107otp.154.1615709818177; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 00:16:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> In-Reply-To: <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> From: Pip Cet Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:16:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid To: Daniel Colascione Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 47125@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 5:43 AM Daniel Colascione wrote: > On 3/13/21 9:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Pip Cet > >> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:38:16 +0000 > >> > >> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux (the Linux part is not provided by > >> Debian) on an Apple M1-based machine. This currently involves running > >> a kernel compiled with a 16 KB page size (the only fully functional > >> kernel is currently available as a binary as recompilation of the > >> alleged source fails to produce a fully working kernel). > >> > >> The Debian-packaged Emacs version does not start. Compiling from > >> scratch works fine. > >> > >> After some investigation, this is because pdumper assumes that an > >> address aligned according to the page size at build time is > >> sufficiently aligned for mmap to work with the MAP_FIXED flag, when it > >> comes to loading the dump. That's not true because the Debian Emacs > >> was apparently built with a 4 KB page size, so it will not run on a > >> system with a 16 KB page size. > >> > >> I've confirmed that I get the same error on current master if I modify > >> getpagesize to return 4096 rather than the correct value. > >> > >> I think it would be best to handle this case gracefully, and I thought > >> pdumper already did that, but it appears to simply fail. > >> > >> There are good reasons for increasing the page size, so this is likely > >> to happen more often and on other architectures with varying page > >> sizes. > > CC'ing Daniel, in case he has comments and/or suggestions. > > We should modify this function to do what the doc comment says then. :-) > I'm not sure if there's any reliable way to know what the worst case > allocation granularity actually is: a quick grep through /usr/include > didn't turn up anything. Maybe we should just use a minimum of 16kB > here? It's not as if we'd be wasting a ton of RAM doing so. Linux also offers 64KB pages, so I believe Andreas is correct, that would be better. Should we verify that getpagesize isn't problematic when loading the dump? Thanks Pip From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 28 11:46:24 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 15:46:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQXcN-0006C3-Ma for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:46:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57024) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQXcL-0006Bp-PD for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:46:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7Vx2gYN3onsWL6DxSlCdxcexYt/SnT5Ip3rtcX88icc=; b=J7ipB5hu5/un/NMF7uEvFSF/HG cdkiAdwCbhXOtbcbx8wj4W0+pcU0Cr+SksQdsfxH10OekTs6011Ss96R3jV9dyx3HULWMYecEC1N7 rHTY8WZ7xsiymsJZ0tj1oqSC36I8DRu+o/9mX4X7rSW/qQ+aT2v/roIEueBUpOsSlYt0=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQXcB-0003qT-29; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:14 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Pip Cet Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> X-Now-Playing: King Crimson's _The Complete 1969 Recordings (13): Sessions 1_: "I Talk to the Wind Takes 1 to 4" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Pip Cet's message of "Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:16:21 +0000") Message-ID: <87v99bp9ha.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Pip Cet writes: > Linux also offers 64KB pages, so I believe Andreas is correct, that > would be better. > > Should we verify that getpagesize isn't problematic when loading the dump? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Colascione , 47125@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Pip Cet writes: > Linux also offers 64KB pages, so I believe Andreas is correct, that > would be better. > > Should we verify that getpagesize isn't problematic when loading the dump? This was two weeks ago, and there was no followup here. Everybody seemed to agree that we should use 64K here... So is the following patch correct? diff --git a/src/pdumper.c b/src/pdumper.c index 337742fda4..bdaba0269f 100644 --- a/src/pdumper.c +++ b/src/pdumper.c @@ -162,11 +162,7 @@ ptrdiff_t_to_dump_off (ptrdiff_t value) static int dump_get_page_size (void) { -#if defined (WINDOWSNT) || defined (CYGWIN) return 64 * 1024; /* Worst-case allocation granularity. */ -#else - return getpagesize (); -#endif } #define dump_offsetof(type, member) \ -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 28 11:46:37 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 15:46:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQXcV-0006CQ-14 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:46:37 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQXcU-0006CC-5T for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:46:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ztayfiiVXuZgZqJX/4kXxVJAi+zJccUnsQF7ZxXf5jY=; b=kEf5XPNQA5PqX5mAt9vFBk11m9 bBs92+KmNZ7VnZloDCzT0WGW62tVQ3upu5sg84r6RG0RL47bUW1I7irCmzMRgKHAhTs4o6L2r6+bq mmFaiiG+50v18YDyIo0emqEp8YlXkeu2u2M7f6ONr+nz95E+1bNywnMuByu5EyW4AOmQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQXcM-0003qd-HM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:24 +0200 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:21 +0200 Message-Id: <87tuovp9gy.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #47125 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 47125 + patch quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 47125 + patch quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 28 12:16:38 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 16:16:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5e-0000dy-3Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5c-0000dj-Ke for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5W-0002xj-F5; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:30 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4604 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5V-0002SI-Aj; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:36 +0300 Message-Id: <83pmzjmexn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87v99bp9ha.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:09 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> <87v99bp9ha.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: dancol@dancol.org, 47125@debbugs.gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Daniel Colascione , Eli Zaretskii , > 47125@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:09 +0200 > > This was two weeks ago, and there was no followup here. Everybody > seemed to agree that we should use 64K here... So is the following > patch correct? Yes, I think so. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 28 13:13:35 2021 Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 17:13:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46940 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQYyl-00020U-1Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:13:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQYyk-00020E-1p for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:13:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=E/P0mPdgRiM9RaZ6cLRBq+7GToWmKWCB3tDLYA26PRE=; b=QGwO55kioiFVIAaf30CxlDHnKc 4DEvuF571Q2bIChgmPpuuTKKuCkH0OO70QjxYUtwkUxJbzgdLi7+kFh9A8/77+f4hoMqbX2Q9BdGV KxXLj7z133u5vzkMScaACsXRXo0Ohw3aDARFS43SWCyxlityV7BrxKdFuj3VeSkpOYYo=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQYyY-0004b4-9O; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:13:26 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> <87v99bp9ha.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmzjmexn.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Mary Halvorson's Code Girl's _Artlessly Falling_: "Mexican War Streets (Pittsburgh)" Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:13:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83pmzjmexn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:36 +0300") Message-ID: <87k0prp5fz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This was two weeks ago, and there was no followup here. Everybody >> seemed to agree that we should use 64K here... So is the following >> patch correct? > > Yes, I think so. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47125 Cc: dancol@dancol.org, 47125@debbugs.gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This was two weeks ago, and there was no followup here. Everybody >> seemed to agree that we should use 64K here... So is the following >> patch correct? > > Yes, I think so. OK; pushed to Emacs 28 now, then. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 28 13:13:42 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 17:13:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46943 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQYys-00020m-A2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:13:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQYyo-00020L-64 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:13:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=q3rnDrREkZLWSJSBll4kCForc7cSpD3IvtMqfdX/f5w=; b=ry+gwWrgRW9G6Caf/pjlyLoqef PsAcsOWwDKszHxavo6UW/QY4lURKSCTu9pr367UoXO34MVS9012d2AYYsEJ5ShENIKP6NZYm086o1 CUqaBamimT/Yfl+U+C/+9evXaqKdmx+2+hasyH6kK7r8OKGTPwr/mgafalCJjXWVleT0=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQYyg-0004bC-JT for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:13:32 +0200 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:13:29 +0200 Message-Id: <87im5bp5fq.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #47125 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 47125 fixed close 47125 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 47125 fixed close 47125 28.1 quit From unknown Thu Aug 21 12:12:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator