GNU bug report logs - #47086
[PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: "jgart" <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:07:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 47086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, 47086 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3.
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:09:22 +0100
Hi,

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 05:06, jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> From: LibreMiami <packaging-guix <at> libremiami.org>

[...]

> Co-authored-by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
> Co-authored-by: donotshake <donotshake:matrix.org>

[...]

> +;;; Copyright © 2021 LibreMiami <packaging-guix <at> libremiami.org>

Is LibreMiami a person or a «juridical person»?  If not, I am not
convinced LibreMiami can hold the Copyright.

IANAL, the commit author is fine to be <your-imagination-is-the-limit>
but the Copyright needs to be a legal person and cannot be an informal
group.  Or I do not see the reason of these Copyright lines header.

It is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f44592c2 adding
the package ’t’ (then renamed) and
3b2d7ada40db66439ce3d285960208687d79b421 tweaking the package mumble.


Cheers,
simon

PS: I agree that there is similar with copyrights hold by «nickname»
(~10), in my understanding, it does not make sense either, even if IANAL
again.  Well, nickname is another story I guess.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 65 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.