From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:14:31 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#47086 <47086@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#47086 <47086@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. Reply-To: bug#47086 <47086@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:14:31 +0000 retitle 47086 [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. reassign 47086 guix-patches submitter 47086 "jgart" severity 47086 normal tag 47086 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 12 00:06:14 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 05:06:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55821 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKa06-0001CJ-1C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:06:14 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56738) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKa04-0001CA-KJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:06:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKa04-0003zH-Fn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:06:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:12381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKa01-0002fr-On for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:06:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 24032450; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:06:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:from:message-id:subject:to; s= 20190914; bh=chgolXNiOtwSo8f6i4mMdQJzNbLAqTxN8x3bjaajSbo=; b=Otq 6Y8zDyrbh/l6S1QLl4/sKOtYN9HT3WMCy3MHPg66FbERN4xZu7+3PzUQbaC1TR2C QymRf37pJy2NOAGfiwfjUk8SA17tRgAaEVXsdEADxSJNXpufJqvvaVTkvexdR3vY MwS1mCurO4FJQ8JE3NLdGFAd9amDbMmy+GaVZPqGvvwgnwcx+AYwpwcx3yHWwArM jjnwJpFf4BccRpnFiYrG3COK6SqmpQfeNynJ4Ij2oEUNHUMo5YZwydPZZ9OXCxf4 97Ne/CQfgxD8+Q3KU+oYDMhhrQqRcYLGwlb4QYjzPLikiT0qw/JQmxHR4l+m9Ixy 9Nap7PoPlLMjD/GHztQ== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ab36f710; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:06:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id be017ceb; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:06:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a9536334 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:06:02 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:06:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--=_RainLoop_521_546265510.1615525561" X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jgart@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) ----=_RainLoop_521_546265510.1615525561 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Guix!=0A=0AHere is an update to tig.=0A=0Aall the best,=0A=0Ajgart=0A= =0Alibremiami.org=0Asearch.libremiami.org ----=_RainLoop_521_546265510.1615525561 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="0001-gnu-tig-Update-to-2.5.3.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-tig-Update-to-2.5.3.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RnJvbSBhYjM3MWEzMjY1MzZhOTFmN2UxY2FhMjg4ZTI1YTlhMDgxOGUyYjdiIE1vbiBTZXAg MTcgMDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBMaWJyZU1pYW1pIDxwYWNrYWdpbmctZ3VpeEBsaWJy ZW1pYW1pLm9yZz4KRGF0ZTogVGh1LCAxMSBNYXIgMjAyMSAyMzo0OToxMSAtMDUwMApTdWJq ZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIGdudTogdGlnOiBVcGRhdGUgdG8gMi41LjMuCgoqIGdudS9wYWNrYWdl cy92ZXJzaW9uLWNvbnRyb2wuc2NtICh0aWcpOiBVcGRhdGUgdG8gMi41LjMuCgpDby1hdXRo b3JlZC1ieTogamdhcnQgPGpnYXJ0QGRpc21haWwuZGU+CkNvLWF1dGhvcmVkLWJ5OiBkb25v dHNoYWtlIDxkb25vdHNoYWtlOm1hdHJpeC5vcmc+Ci0tLQogZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3ZlcnNp b24tY29udHJvbC5zY20gfCA1ICsrKy0tCiAxIGZpbGUgY2hhbmdlZCwgMyBpbnNlcnRpb25z KCspLCAyIGRlbGV0aW9ucygtKQoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy92ZXJzaW9u LWNvbnRyb2wuc2NtIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3ZlcnNpb24tY29udHJvbC5zY20KaW5kZXgg ZDg1YjUzNTJmYS4uNjc3YjJmNTMyMiAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3ZlcnNp b24tY29udHJvbC5zY20KKysrIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3ZlcnNpb24tY29udHJvbC5zY20K QEAgLTM2LDYgKzM2LDcgQEAKIDs7OyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgwqkgMjAyMSBNYXhpbSBDb3Vybm95 ZXIgPG1heGltLmNvdXJub3llckBnbWFpbC5jb20+CiA7OzsgQ29weXJpZ2h0IMKpIDIwMjEg Q2hyaXMgTWFydXNpY2ggPGNtbWFydXNpY2hAZ21haWwuY29tPgogOzs7IENvcHlyaWdodCDC qSAyMDIxIEzDqW8gTGUgQm91dGVyIDxsbGUtYm91dEB6YWNseXMubmV0PgorOzs7IENvcHly aWdodCDCqSAyMDIxIExpYnJlTWlhbWkgPHBhY2thZ2luZy1ndWl4QGxpYnJlbWlhbWkub3Jn PgogOzs7CiA7OzsgVGhpcyBmaWxlIGlzIHBhcnQgb2YgR05VIEd1aXguCiA7OzsKQEAgLTIx OTYsNyArMjE5Nyw3IEBAIGZyb20gU3VidmVyc2lvbiB0byBhbnkgc3VwcG9ydGVkIERpc3Ry aWJ1dGVkIFZlcnNpb24gQ29udHJvbCBTeXN0ZW0gKERWQ1MpLiIpCiAoZGVmaW5lLXB1Ymxp YyB0aWcKICAgKHBhY2thZ2UKICAgICAobmFtZSAidGlnIikKLSAgICAodmVyc2lvbiAiMi41 LjEiKQorICAgICh2ZXJzaW9uICIyLjUuMyIpCiAgICAgKHNvdXJjZSAob3JpZ2luCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIChtZXRob2QgdXJsLWZldGNoKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAodXJpIChzdHJp bmctYXBwZW5kCkBAIC0yMjA0LDcgKzIyMDUsNyBAQCBmcm9tIFN1YnZlcnNpb24gdG8gYW55 IHN1cHBvcnRlZCBEaXN0cmlidXRlZCBWZXJzaW9uIENvbnRyb2wgU3lzdGVtIChEVkNTKS4i KQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB2ZXJzaW9uICIvdGlnLSIgdmVyc2lvbiAiLnRhci5n eiIpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoc2hhMjU2CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAoYmFzZTMyCi0g ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIjByNHk5aHl2cGtwbGF4cnpzbHdzM2FzejY1MmQ4M3FoM2Jqd3Zt cDhhc3NnYThzNXMzYWgiKSkpKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICIxcDE1NzV5aDRkYXhqaWZ5 d3hrZDBoZ3lmd2NpeWxxY20ycWFrYXd2d242bWs2MjBjYTc1IikpKSkKICAgICAoYnVpbGQt c3lzdGVtIGdudS1idWlsZC1zeXN0ZW0pCiAgICAgKG5hdGl2ZS1pbnB1dHMKICAgICAgYCgo ImFzY2lpZG9jIiAsYXNjaWlkb2MpCi0tIAoyLjMwLjIKCg== ----=_RainLoop_521_546265510.1615525561-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 12 04:14:54 2021 Received: (at 47086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 09:14:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56026 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKdsj-0007Oh-Ty for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:14:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:42823) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKdsi-0007OT-7G for 47086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:14:52 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b2-20020a7bc2420000b029010be1081172so14720554wmj.1 for <47086@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:14:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z4Iay2aVoMGYqfEyyrmcil6BfQkg4zjDq15jJErx13Y=; b=rbsDGihsf+vNliFOdPRfcwnwSBcNRyAbY85SKk/4lYGvuYVX0y0vQxjiAwF2kWGHAa f1JuhqKUQv8NOZzxESCsx875h9Js1PHbtxZt1sutqmoowWrPbrN8L2pr/rJsKBqjI+s7 gzjM2SnooY3UP0p4wEZAlvAR4Z0IEY9McvdryfPvoffI9i0LJSH39Ql4koUfVl1OiYe3 5TrRlvVuVZ39h4kKVxFbSag+8G8l81rzTe1rOB3UDtuQZTo7YaddrymMKfz0BKWaPpO7 AWymrgI2IU/nzRfvX7TiaQfF3rW8NACe2YJaI4DZ/pQzzSFEgqy5SVWS0cfcvS+Z265k aM1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z4Iay2aVoMGYqfEyyrmcil6BfQkg4zjDq15jJErx13Y=; b=LXsO64ZjOT1c1Nexs7IQp/ernzQsXhAyvnrtk24OP0kAGtFl4pxCvzu2Lk0s1m2GG4 8PMHCqHjbDYGDUdR4C1fhhOOadBT6WUSgf2oTNYUr33PFR/JBmlRHzTbPv+sMK8tmG2s 4FULeKfa/fHgObZmix3QhixubHHSTFVEvEjhkGgr/cpvT6GEgwdTa8KURWP/OAmZWMyr aKArZ5tmBnBwLznGk4MGdkV9zuGc6LSjw3HA646EN1ZTWIiUxyq1wkCBQGKj2r1of1PY Fj5Fe+YiLaVvcgquUUWNirN15p75UaFIpPuYc98jdd17rBnwtWkyz1sgmvPfRU1GTef3 qHUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wTa5Ogcl+Ukz4cD+5zjeDPODUOWHJL+3fLjlbpQ+1VI/UrguE VUokXtS0wunRZTac20GVXMTpZ+8HNKk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjSytKiHi8N4DHkcYxzlAUsdhsPOCWQ9RLgL4C+m/MpxQepTRxFBMMjCBwzKnMRl6TQ08tGg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:43c6:: with SMTP id q189mr12126882wma.80.1615540486210; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:14:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s20sm1442923wmj.36.2021.03.12.01.14.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:14:45 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: jgart , 47086@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. In-Reply-To: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> References: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:09:22 +0100 Message-ID: <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 05:06, jgart via Guix-patches via wrote: > From: LibreMiami [...] > Co-authored-by: jgart > Co-authored-by: donotshake [...] > +;;; Copyright =C2=A9 2021 LibreMiami Is LibreMiami a person or a =C2=ABjuridical person=C2=BB? If not, I am not convinced LibreMiami can hold the Copyright. IANAL, the commit author is fine to be but the Copyright needs to be a legal person and cannot be an informal group. Or I do not see the reason of these Copyright lines header. It is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f44592c2 adding the package =E2=80=99t=E2=80=99 (then renamed) and 3b2d7ada40db66439ce3d285960208687d79b421 tweaking the package mumble. Cheers, simon PS: I agree that there is similar with copyrights hold by =C2=ABnickname=C2= =BB (~10), in my understanding, it does not make sense either, even if IANAL again. Well, nickname is another story I guess. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 12 06:42:19 2021 Received: (at 47086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 11:42:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKgBP-0002r1-Kr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:42:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:47086) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKgBN-0002qm-Aq for 47086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:42:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e32331de; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:42:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=wH JxEalcusXClQtlUMDE60ooQ0qaZAzB3dP894dHAaU=; b=BVIIPcOFthrAIGTPgS kkBm/mMU8ssCCBNVJjNRRSIAf7IXzrAMkwl2J42w8/nf5LHS8OGL4/Kdf+NGz4r5 OjQqOja/vhXYA0pyNlPTA6vKa3KgziwYyxKcQYSnue+D0joeZTg1ELFUG3qTNBFn wFDA1SvTo+06wblGnEdUsqktfaVRkuwaqP9d9JA6QWwI4qbx3zABS8phKzC8Gg1C U21Fo2YXBk/liiJ7MkLLiBwOK9ttvz/5C6jlJw9uqGY4PhZu57sdac9imx8pG1WE ZqcmPhexEdXPiHNLCBkOJwFl1IVXu1rgwHOlkIXlxFpupkDsqN7/jJ+mOEzN3u/M tH4A== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a3081a8f; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:42:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 46799098; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:42:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9c7fd2eb (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:42:07 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:42:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: <1a2e15a36aa4757e49a1f175c7cf014f@dismail.de> Subject: Re: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: "zimoun" , 47086@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Is LibreMiami a person or a =C2=ABjuridical person=C2=BB?=0A=0AHi zimou= n,=0A=0AYes, LibreMiami is a juridical person. We are a legal entity that= commits and works on packaging software together.=0A=0A> It is also the = case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f44592c2 adding=0A> the package = =E2=80=99t=E2=80=99 (then renamed) and ...=0A=0A#46969 and go-github-com-= operatorfoundation-ed25519 (a2ece4da1fdccb9e94681e38a3f3a79b0d43e061) are= other examples too.=0A=0AWe host a package meetup every month. If you're= available, we'd love to meet you and work on something together, also.= =0A=0Abest regards,=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0Alibremiami.org=0Asearch.libremiami.or= g=0Amumble.libremiami.org=0Aevents.libremiami.org=0A=0AMarch 12, 2021 4:1= 4 AM, "zimoun" wrote:=0A=0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> On F= ri, 12 Mar 2021 at 05:06, jgart via Guix-patches via wrote:=0A> =0A>> From: LibreMiami =0A> = =0A> [...]=0A> =0A>> Co-authored-by: jgart =0A>> Co-aut= hored-by: donotshake =0A> =0A> [...]=0A> =0A>> +;;= ; Copyright =C2=A9 2021 LibreMiami =0A> = =0A> Is LibreMiami a person or a =C2=ABjuridical person=C2=BB? If not, I = am not=0A> convinced LibreMiami can hold the Copyright.=0A> =0A> IANAL, t= he commit author is fine to be =0A> but th= e Copyright needs to be a legal person and cannot be an informal=0A> grou= p. Or I do not see the reason of these Copyright lines header.=0A> =0A> I= t is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f44592c2 adding=0A= > the package =E2=80=99t=E2=80=99 (then renamed) and=0A> 3b2d7ada40db6643= 9ce3d285960208687d79b421 tweaking the package mumble.=0A> =0A> Cheers,=0A= > simon=0A> =0A> PS: I agree that there is similar with copyrights hold b= y =C2=ABnickname=C2=BB=0A> (~10), in my understanding, it does not make s= ense either, even if IANAL=0A> again. Well, nickname is another story I g= uess. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 12 07:32:55 2021 Received: (at 47086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 12:32:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKgyN-0006DL-HF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:32:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:39465) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKgyK-0006D6-LF for 47086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:32:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 124-20020a1c00820000b029010b871409cfso15691677wma.4 for <47086@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:32:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uv+NYy8evtMVt8TPs93qdMJYyKFS374HDwCrqYz32e8=; b=Ogo0gZozv5drZNDBKCudSfDMk+HWZeHVBs2zdE7+5oM129xyWoBQDHjzPny+wOdnXi pBEOFaMNu4A+iTQQuakJoWJZdVHu/DoBn7TOLh9VUtG5KhXRxyqrvmNzKoalSbWQKGBW PQZC4EU/2XK9H9ddx4yWQqPnho1uLrlbQ+jfimpkpYSgnGdRGrWumfPDmXHViKeb73z+ 6v/68VSk/+oiny7F6QstsxglW2D+aBiRBvpiiMlODlXjVcJ8QthjLSgvZvhbsxFXvBfU LhEU0fXyfwE7wBFdVh8zNFW2eJPCbEfZG609ayXbLW6fd2SOPcoE7zqWYAe2zPvuSIEa 0Maw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uv+NYy8evtMVt8TPs93qdMJYyKFS374HDwCrqYz32e8=; b=BUgPFRuqTWRNFSoXsuKoz9pDkgJwtnjgFnK2VWr6V3/adpFX/scPE6Twq0vYIAvZIe RsjUdZ0E4aT8bZ1HcOl5iMcJnvdHXUA7T9fSgGXW7eklv4Vl1rBPjgZ2PiM55tR+41fQ JzD+2cmqfnBkJu0QCNGUJhFm19WNMH1mpP+opszxhGQMCeL2+8jHdDDnwNzkTmSgtxqG xyGNr0tsnYcySRsaP5Wjt8iTNxhW4AlCCk2gj7uS7rfVOO5ZwypCTB+QAQEYlsv30mMM BTisniRb1gMfB1kA9zSth5+lkV3jaZARkboS185Ww7Sm1l7ZDcy2fto2zl8wQ9BE2TaS IqNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+bw3yoF41Y4mtdii1bi6nFxkdC+p7L+cUorralKCNUyHlEMah niwPq780IL/CCIi3DFu3UifGzYDctOo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxc0svBVC1FPEArPhKAGisTcvGuud4okvMZxGrJEcOL+iNo96sFKwAee4EUkt+7sJMs683NGA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6a03:: with SMTP id f3mr7661190wmc.179.1615552366743; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:32:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s16sm7646561wru.91.2021.03.12.04.32.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:32:46 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: jgart , 47086@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. In-Reply-To: <1a2e15a36aa4757e49a1f175c7cf014f@dismail.de> References: <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <1a2e15a36aa4757e49a1f175c7cf014f@dismail.de> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:27:54 +0100 Message-ID: <86czw4imk5.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 11:42, "jgart" wrote: >> Is LibreMiami a person or a =C2=ABjuridical person=C2=BB? > Yes, LibreMiami is a juridical person. We are a legal entity that > commits and works on packaging software together. Thanks for the clarification. I still think it is a bad idea that LibreMiami holds the Copyright instead of people who effectively did the work. That=E2=80=99s my point of view. >> It is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f44592c2 adding >> the package =E2=80=99t=E2=80=99 (then renamed) and ... > > #46969 and go-github-com-operatorfoundation-ed25519 > (a2ece4da1fdccb9e94681e38a3f3a79b0d43e061) are other examples too. If I read correctly, this commit a2ece4 does not lead to a Copyright assignment. So it=E2=80=99s fine. Even, I find really cool that 6 people co-authored a patch during a meetup. > We host a package meetup every month. If you're available, we'd love > to meet you and work on something together, also.=20 This is really cool! Great initiative. Maybe I will show up. :-) My point is just about the holder of the Copyright. Concretely, to be correct legally speaking, IIUC, the co-authors (of the 2 commits and this patch) signed a copyright transfer to the LibreMiami entity. Otherwise, the copyright does not belong to LibreMiami. Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 12 08:47:34 2021 Received: (at 47086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 13:47:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi8b-00087G-Lp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:47:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:26284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi8X-000870-I1 for 47086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:47:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a91b57db; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=4J JszXTo+I6YqkjkaM84jRmDzYMLHit8M7ZvossTqLU=; b=ryGcDgS0jmuh7qDwOn G6DpEIL1MeTBRHuLwu+uW8hVt0yZLWjo+nc11BeANB8Jsb8JXWXgisDH1/a/OPHo 9DOFhnAZT+PaCgBaNKzd/wpj2hROH9Pc5GO1yOXFHa+ddxcMUIvgg6o/cbygzZNg bQxhCbgacOmEYMmJekx+wMYzAD20acWl5ATyfsagn7uY34pR225wkoSQwxQlYmSC a1E8RER2IIdZRQBS8N+0QmY4bxmdmxp1DG/7W5beChqmctd89JBKkpBi/bjRbiLc 0P2BWNG0AJ3JRnjvcBgPAUUnHDe8326Ltt8hK6391v/SndTRdMaE+ZC3twaHdNrS Tv/w== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 63078d62; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 373b40e4; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bc579785 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:21 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:47:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: "zimoun" , 47086@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <86czw4imk5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86czw4imk5.fsf@gmail.com> <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <1a2e15a36aa4757e49a1f175c7cf014f@dismail.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi zimoun,=0A=0AThank you for your interest.=0A=0A> I still think it is a= bad idea that LibreMiami holds the Copyright instead of people who effec= tively did the=0A> work. That=E2=80=99s my point of view.=0A=0AI respect = your point of view. We attribute everyone involved in the packaging effor= t during any given packaging session.=0A=0AWe include a "Co-authored-by: = ..." tag in all the commit messages for those involved.=0A=0AAll parties = involved are aware of this and also decide whether they want to be includ= ed in the commit message or not. Some also prefer anonymity and no copyri= ght claim. We even have a pre-meetup questionnaire that helps facilitate = this. =0A=0AIf you come to one of our meetups and prefer to add your own = copyright to the top of the file instead of adding it as a group that is = fine by us also. We have a field in the pre-meetup questionnaire where pe= ople can indicate what they prefer. =0A=0AWhen I work on a contribution a= lone I commit with my own name but when I work with LibreMiami I prefer t= o commit under that entity and include the "Co-authored-by" tag. =0A=0AWe= prefer to commit/work together as a group and that is a convenience for = us. LibreMiami just wants to act as a steward of free software and we see= guix packaging as a way of realizing that common goal. We'd like to onbo= ard as many guix packagers as possible. We believe persons from all walks= of life can update and package software given a bit of practice and orie= ntation. Guix's transparency as a community/technology is a perfect vehic= al for this cause. =0A=0AI hope this clarified things. Feel free to ask m= ore questions and/or chat with us at libremiami:matrix.org.=0A=0AThere is= also an xmpp bridge if you prefer xmpp: #libremiami#matrix.org@matrix.or= g=0A=0A> This is really cool! Great initiative. Maybe I will show up. :-)= =0A=0AThank you! Yes, stop by. We'd love to have you. I will be announcin= g the next guix packaging meetup soon on guix-devel.=0A=0A> If I read cor= rectly, this commit a2ece4 does not lead to a Copyright=0A> assignment. S= o it=E2=80=99s fine. Even, I find really cool that 6 people=0A> co-author= ed a patch during a meetup.=0A=0AI think it is cool also.=0A=0Aall the be= st,=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0Alibremiami.org=0Asearch.libremiami.org=0Amumble.libre= miami.org=0Astream.libremiami.org=0A=0AMarch 12, 2021 7:32 AM, "zimoun" <= zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 = at 11:42, "jgart" wrote:=0A> =0A>>> Is LibreMiami a pe= rson or a =C2=ABjuridical person=C2=BB?=0A>> =0A>> Yes, LibreMiami is a j= uridical person. We are a legal entity that=0A>> commits and works on pac= kaging software together.=0A> =0A> Thanks for the clarification. I still = think it is a bad idea that=0A> LibreMiami holds the Copyright instead of= people who effectively did the=0A> work. That=E2=80=99s my point of view= .=0A> =0A>>> It is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f445= 92c2 adding=0A>>> the package =E2=80=99t=E2=80=99 (then renamed) and ...= =0A>> =0A>> #46969 and go-github-com-operatorfoundation-ed25519=0A>> (a2e= ce4da1fdccb9e94681e38a3f3a79b0d43e061) are other examples too.=0A> =0A> I= f I read correctly, this commit a2ece4 does not lead to a Copyright=0A> a= ssignment. So it=E2=80=99s fine. Even, I find really cool that 6 people= =0A> co-authored a patch during a meetup.=0A> =0A>> We host a package mee= tup every month. If you're available, we'd love=0A>> to meet you and work= on something together, also.=0A> =0A> This is really cool! Great initiat= ive. Maybe I will show up. :-)=0A> =0A> My point is just about the holder= of the Copyright. Concretely, to be=0A> correct legally speaking, IIUC, = the co-authors (of the 2 commits and=0A> this patch) signed a copyright t= ransfer to the LibreMiami entity.=0A> Otherwise, the copyright does not b= elong to LibreMiami.=0A> =0A> Cheers,=0A> simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 12 10:29:01 2021 Received: (at 47086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 15:29:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjin-0004eO-DZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:29:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:34007) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKjij-0004e9-F5 for 47086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:28:59 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id u16so5043332wrt.1 for <47086@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:28:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=7UXj9p8YKE0sbpWe8jX8xIjCYmELmP3VrSgYCBvMKaY=; b=n6Bax3wOu7s+WqeqvjtAYr1PAAzP3TRuYHxDi8miWIhOTb9wCEv5oSc9bSNG5slMf4 1nDx3EKOghQjGn3htfEov0UnpLKIdWi9d/0HZdch2TycRZJjP5aUJkHyfQoFGY4aE662 FO3Ok1CrwQOCXq5cr19+lNCRQuatp0MkJtkG4O5MdxqXE9dqH3i1mAgyBgk+C6OIy8xn 001D679jYIVVstKdp3keBW1tS3U7f7Mj8ApSARIkV5HXNOzzSKyxfdhBtnSzkNmPbrrb m38E++G2DDLygDb6KrYr51JBNLb2tuPmmaNq3zME13vSdJb2mgQ0RIhVQdx60Ylz9SZg Wbeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=7UXj9p8YKE0sbpWe8jX8xIjCYmELmP3VrSgYCBvMKaY=; b=TxvBbgJXFRVMEB/bd17cvES+LEAiQBK27JpGLmOM+9uGc2QOavUTMkKn6UDjLjeDOX M761R2/v+zB12Wib6ffuCjZMBRg20KtJHkqn58getA3kTu+O9oDAqY0gerrsWlMXm1qC qINYjgcZZIxSxWYIVlvb1wjF6wNDJsp1jQk1qVtCQ/bYc6D/2PSsB8Eu6E3DxJZGr9eZ Srlx/+cb9MUBoSkUIcvenJYFGIFYoWY0xznQG/66/5t7HE27yZsTBLEDiZfjPM5iDMgL 019j8Zy0W2V8OYQOB/eCp/6R78jRBgkm3cLurTVOn5cOi3LVMVe+RdI6CrAJdJisio4X TgPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pFbKEDqqiPn/wNLO4N5CkyMo7VxV7hfliIJRa4g1IhTjrl/zc EB03sRI6CqugYGWNg9S3xuHvGmaWeG8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKZzc5TkxjcBBxV2Md1+kFTuJIxOup6VlPKAgy9x2KRMTjEyZBntEF3el7bSkjXSvQKondhg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6307:: with SMTP id i7mr14820120wru.305.1615562931565; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:28:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s83sm2474974wmf.26.2021.03.12.07.28.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:28:51 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: jgart , 47086@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. In-Reply-To: References: <86czw4imk5.fsf@gmail.com> <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <1a2e15a36aa4757e49a1f175c7cf014f@dismail.de> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:24:50 +0100 Message-ID: <864khgied9.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 13:47, "jgart" wrote: > I respect your point of view. We attribute everyone involved in the > packaging effort during any given packaging session. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.45 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.45 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 13:47, "jgart" wrote: > I respect your point of view. We attribute everyone involved in the > packaging effort during any given packaging session. It is fine if we disagree. :-) The important was the clarification. Thank you for that. Maybe see you on the next meetup. Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 17 07:05:29 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 11:05:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMTzU-0007Yn-SZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:05:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMTzS-0007YY-QU for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:05:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMTzM-0007r3-NF; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:05:20 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=45862 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lMTz9-0007R9-Uo; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:05:17 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "jgart" Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. References: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:05:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> (jgart@dismail.de's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:06:01 +0000") Message-ID: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done Cc: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, "jgart" skribis: > From ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: LibreMiami > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:49:11 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Update to 2.5.3. > > Co-authored-by: jgart > Co-authored-by: donotshake Applied. However I agree with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is debatable. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 17 14:57:13 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 18:57:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMbM1-000737-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:57:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:8628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMbLy-00072q-OF for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:57:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ecb39390; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:57:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=GeX5Vi9cF+cNEINue4bYyKG4M2d6DMloIdCpf/sC4OI=; b=QrZWbk5z4eUo ylybpmbyNL4fvEn2FUbh1fEIF7iZ1H0dSSCdB4jKNsZc6T/dkSYgHgKaL6m+OYFP HD0ETkQIf7hZMnBDODnPPPbyrlJAhczEwU9KRy7kRAo0zXu89XFP8wtgok02rIhc sf3SGqHW7hA92SAgVFIX7w0aGkxSl9zObNvALcD3KAMnXDmlixwxzj+LBfB4GtLz /m+hLuEFWp7+KYft/moOv+BT8aiSBlj2X0gvCAJg6JYo7VEfrSHqL+tNAr0dZLoI 9z/6iVwbQKVNdy3Ix7zZ5VtBqEVqRODBOFXiHpWeJMohCtWAsRKp86jHIzSkNyIM HjHYHHGD7A== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2e285f77; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:57:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d3a0e900; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:57:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b67c39de (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:57:02 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:57:01 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: "=?utf-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?=" In-Reply-To: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done Cc: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, rprior@protonmail.com, packaging-guix@libremiami.org, Raghav Gururajan , Roberto Beltran X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Ludo and zimoun,=0A=0AI discussed this further with LibreMiami members= and we are thinking about the following solution to=0Athis issue:=0A=0AW= e would still author commits as LibreMiami with our group email, packagin= g-guix@libremiami.org.=0AAll the co-authors would be listed in the commit= body, as usual.=0A=0ALibreMiami would not be mentioned in any copyright = statements going forward. Instead, we would add the=0Acopyright statement= for each contributor at the top of the file. =0A=0AWe might have several= individuals contributing in one packaging session. Would this pose any i= ssues?=0A=0AFor example, there's a possibility that we might have 10 new = contributors in one packaging session and therefore 10 new copyright stat= ements at the top of source code files that might get introduced in that = one session alone. =0A=0AThis was one of the main reasons why we collecti= vely agreed on adding LibreMiami's copyright statement to the top of sour= ce code files.=0A=0AWhat are your thoughts on this matter? Should I move = this to a mailing list discussion?=0A=0Aall the best,=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0Alib= remiami.org=0A=0AMarch 17, 2021 7:05 AM, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" wrote:=0A=0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> "jgart" skribis:=0A> = =0A>> From ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2= 001=0A>> From: LibreMiami =0A>> Date: Thu,= 11 Mar 2021 23:49:11 -0500=0A>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5= .3.=0A>> =0A>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Update to 2.5.3.= =0A>> =0A>> Co-authored-by: jgart =0A>> Co-authored-by:= donotshake =0A> =0A> Applied.=0A> =0A> However I = agree with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is=0A> debatable= .=0A> =0A> Thanks,=0A> Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 17 15:16:30 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 19:16:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43997 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMbef-0007WM-UY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:16:30 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:59746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMbec-0007W5-2J for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:16:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [31.210.181.184]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F10ED40501; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:15:43 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner To: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, jgart@dismail.de Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. Message-ID: References: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="63ZShZ+h0UmS/6oJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --63ZShZ+h0UmS/6oJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi, >=20 > "jgart" skribis: >=20 > > From ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: LibreMiami > > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:49:11 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. > > > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Update to 2.5.3. > > > > Co-authored-by: jgart > > Co-authored-by: donotshake >=20 > Applied. >=20 > However I agree with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is > debatable. >=20 Is it really that different than everyone involved assigning their copyright to LibreMiami as an aggregator and then sending the patch in? --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --63ZShZ+h0UmS/6oJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAmBSVV0ACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1H9IA/+OWCwxP/rZMSWDk9Wjxs9jUEClWX9LpACNvWxAp3nb8TrD2kdgueBc+JS fTA4cHNd80pT+/pd3ULkFO6HTj1ja7TOwA18aUx7o257ClTVgyLrLrzrSxc+lEzz M2Y8HoBLpXnyW9JjzWTp5ZedPG55SsUGZn3WDfs0CDBdxFuuaeSie8qQedUDRPtT 6N7hX21UhRXdvNJ7fnf0vMbmEQn1ErUHXrzcnP79U46NPW3oKzgc3fCAZ88l6YIw Py8yIOwaNbqt9r20pPTkpvs3v9kQaaK+l0tzhL3fDTq16jbuZ5sX+F7imWtF+DV0 vDP3v1D2c3aLudrr9sOSd27K/5o7Iwe86U0EBnDwhIXIPg7Yb1O0j0uQiGAZmew0 Vv9X0sr+GU6lUOAUiaMmE3vl+VqGHOdMNjTAt8w1FAECTBqQaBdCqp0YVE9Y33AO /BT4LY+HeKqhfpSbnbpCLVdkwLwLP+3sP4jds1ynrF2F+6DuPgfmgq8wsjYFSYaG 720WCZ9sG4H8clFFw/7F/UFnMQQfiRpVJTGVxwEa5tBl6AUmeT3ObvyUDFAbSj1i J0lDRjr7UndNfp9WhAHlkiqvawwsce7zwyokITTMG2/Mg336nce7aPKvtdNFWvfN jf5JO1wzM21PPGi/MWEM0K5pTnmM9Gn9qvPEm1YoqLGRgaGigSc= =7Rr+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --63ZShZ+h0UmS/6oJ-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 17 18:03:37 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 22:03:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMeGP-0007bR-KU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:03:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:3002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMeGK-0007bB-DH for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:03:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5df4d3ce; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:03:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=bB 6DaMF4Wj1r+dPZ/nWaqT59WPWDxHbS9BvffzpZC+0=; b=ChJz9/goZOVDszLBFE d+2SD3wWFlYyFoIOhHYX/aRHpZ23RFcq90s2NwRdT9UlV/EktEEjh/2XPwwaBM8M 8+ysve4D3RvwmMZR6Hm2YW2519PLb0lPzpaXRbT6Qu7Yh7me89GaE6dK052oQ4td qsSU3pTsTG/jj3jYuIjE2bkzsN+SDxIV1ZrtJJnmZ5S5QCDcKXZBpu4N1m93m5EC z8LNFz53Uf1HvCmn2/49SToULEN/a2bQkweYyPJRuNraLlu1rjMKFFopj/ysDSBD OCY3kQAsYG4BtMrGnQsf6N5GG5VV2xfQG2dje4xvJHjvWqwEQdITSftTMdCsU8t5 uhzA== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cd4bfcd9; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:03:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id af66ed9b; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:03:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 57683644 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:03:22 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: "Efraim Flashner" , 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org In-Reply-To: References: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) myself:=0A> We would still author commits as LibreMiami with our group em= ail, packaging-guix@libremiami.org.=0A> All the co-authors would be liste= d in the commit body, as usual.=0A> LibreMiami would not be mentioned in = any copyright statements going forward. Instead, we would add the=0A> cop= yright statement for each contributor at the top of the file. =0A--------= ------------------------------------------------------=0Azimoun:=0A> IANA= L, the commit author is fine to be =0A> bu= t the Copyright needs to be a legal person and cannot be an informal=0A> = group. Or I do not see the reason of these Copyright lines header.=0A=0AH= i Efraim,=0A=0AIf I take zimoun's advice above then my new proposal is in= deed different because LibreMiami=0Ais no longer listed in any of the sou= rce code under copyright statement headers going forward.=0A=0AInstead, a= ll those involved in group packaging would list their own copyright decla= rations in the=0Arespective source code headers.=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0AMarch 17= , 2021 3:16 PM, "Efraim Flashner" wrote:=0A=0A> O= n Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:=0A> = =0A>> Hi,=0A>> =0A>> "jgart" skribis:=0A>> =0A>> From = ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001=0A>> Fr= om: LibreMiami =0A>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 202= 1 23:49:11 -0500=0A>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3.=0A>> = =0A>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Update to 2.5.3.=0A>> =0A= >> Co-authored-by: jgart =0A>> Co-authored-by: donotsha= ke =0A>> =0A>> Applied.=0A>> =0A>> However I agree= with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is=0A>> debatable.=0A= > =0A> Is it really that different than everyone involved assigning their= =0A> copyright to LibreMiami as an aggregator and then sending the patch = in?=0A> =0A> --=0A> Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4= =D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8=0A> GPG key =3D A28B F4= 0C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351=0A> Confidentiality cannot be = guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 17 19:04:42 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 23:04:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMfDV-0000hg-QO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:04:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:30781) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMfDQ-0000hN-Qd for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:04:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cad20676; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:04:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=ISJKS37HXazsQp/csYDG8ROY7w9xoeajE23F4z4lhvs=; b=JxZfPotCo6gI WjZrQpCOWJmi3uW1s6J/Z7kiVAqhx5ruPQVD63WB9kGfTia1hFCtA/wuDD6/O1zm ghgiJBTOeNzI6CREZjGIgDBQrDk1h3loMW8xUJvlI27DTiD4FDHHxsjys2TnO00O Cs617vummscL4bM2WpKbf1MZk53mUzXJ204ajkr16NLEy7V7oGHdCBaD/jiKjcx/ UlXhnHzpeTi1Wm9HoosFr/FbgtaYPZQvVZNT8ZkirGhnZ4MWFWoEZE5zzqGCBnX1 byUlZAjRWZ/t77+JL2pRHwQXdz9gNxXV4ytBESip0CxQpCwCmvq0Ud4kFMVwq+jw 37Nzz28xFw== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 76564e5c; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:04:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 720ad507; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:04:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 354768a5 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:04:29 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:04:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: "=?utf-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?=" In-Reply-To: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done Cc: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Applied.=0A=0AThank you for taking the time to review the patch.=0A=0Aa= ll the best,=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0AMarch 17, 2021 7:05 AM, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8= s" wrote:=0A=0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> "jgart" s= kribis:=0A> =0A>> From ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 1= 7 00:00:00 2001=0A>> From: LibreMiami =0A>= > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:49:11 -0500=0A>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: U= pdate to 2.5.3.=0A>> =0A>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Upda= te to 2.5.3.=0A>> =0A>> Co-authored-by: jgart =0A>> Co-= authored-by: donotshake =0A> =0A=0A> =0A> However = I agree with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is=0A> debatab= le.=0A> =0A> Thanks,=0A> Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 18 05:43:37 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2021 09:43:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpBo-00047C-VH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:43:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpBl-00046w-IT for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:43:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpBf-0001k1-Cp; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:43:27 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51654 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpBe-0005w8-GV; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:43:26 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. References: <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:43:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Efraim Flashner's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:15:43 +0200") Message-ID: <878s6kvltu.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done Cc: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart@dismail.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi Efraim, Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> "jgart" skribis: >>=20 >> > From ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: LibreMiami >> > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:49:11 -0500 >> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. >> > >> > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Update to 2.5.3. >> > >> > Co-authored-by: jgart >> > Co-authored-by: donotshake >>=20 >> Applied. >>=20 >> However I agree with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is >> debatable. >>=20 > > Is it really that different than everyone involved assigning their > copyright to LibreMiami as an aggregator and then sending the patch in? IIUC there=E2=80=99s no LibreMiami legal entity, so it=E2=80=99s not possib= le to assign copyright to LibreMiami. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 18 05:48:07 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2021 09:48:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45093 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpGA-0004El-RO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:48:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpGA-0004EJ-3L for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:48:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpG3-0004Zs-Pf; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:47:59 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51656 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lMpG2-0006R8-RT; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:47:59 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: "jgart" Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. References: <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 28 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:47:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: (jgart@dismail.de's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:57:01 +0000") Message-ID: <87y2eku71u.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done Cc: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, rprior@protonmail.com, packaging-guix@libremiami.org, Raghav Gururajan , Roberto Beltran X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! "jgart" skribis: > I discussed this further with LibreMiami members and we are thinking abou= t the following solution to > this issue: > > We would still author commits as LibreMiami with our group email, packagi= ng-guix@libremiami.org. > All the co-authors would be listed in the commit body, as usual. > > LibreMiami would not be mentioned in any copyright statements going forwa= rd. Instead, we would add the > copyright statement for each contributor at the top of the file.=20 > > We might have several individuals contributing in one packaging session. = Would this pose any issues? Nope, that sounds good! BTW, note that =E2=80=9Ctrivial=E2=80=9D changes (usually considered as =E2= =80=9Cless than 10 lines=E2=80=9D; a package update definitely falls into that category) are n= ot even copyrightable. > For example, there's a possibility that we might have 10 new contributors= in one packaging session and therefore 10 new copyright statements at the = top of source code files that might get introduced in that one session alon= e.=20 > > This was one of the main reasons why we collectively agreed on adding Lib= reMiami's copyright statement to the top of source code files. > > What are your thoughts on this matter? Should I move this to a mailing li= st discussion? I see. If there are literally ten people for each packaging patch you submit, that could be a lot. The other option obviously is to register LibreMiami as a non-profit, to have its members formally assign it copyright on their work, at which point =E2=80=9Ccopyright LibreMiami=E2=80=9D makes perfect sense. HTH! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 18 11:50:08 2021 Received: (at 47086-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2021 15:50:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMuuW-0001Ye-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:50:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:21769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMuuU-0001Y2-VE for 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:50:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 52cdd3ea; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:50:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:cc:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=GQUnd0nYbjB1f6tnRXweEMgiMST+iraLpZmA2RrSkjs=; b=re+G7egOn5UL ckC9r9U4aoIUYZM69A6XzXrgJavtqRC3hj8Af1rL8GKxhLYWQEq1gPO/6IXTFcLR 29rbGqSOvPe5WVLOUFDdoTHxHZCE8IK7njSRAOwxaFAqi/+CK1WnN3S3i69Y3PBD n9doZXL1Nt1DUNZ1q0pbYgE6e0TcAHPJIMCZjqPNaWHNbROmO35dei+qrzCRf6YI R3/kJEVTlLJSxKaKpAaaZ7Ym+oyP0ZmA337n+HWxD6nuCnnoCL6Mf+Crg6PtHSHa SvMibOXC4LeAVLhdpyr1A/avxxdzm3rihpD9oqeWAV9gWJsh4N+6wz13bWgS4IoX qrTPGUjE4w== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3d554857; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:49:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 349d8512; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:49:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ed2851e6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:49:58 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:49:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a From: "jgart" Message-ID: <5145652bf712438235b7dee7233c7adf@dismail.de> Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. To: "=?utf-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyBDb3VydMOocw==?=" In-Reply-To: <87y2eku71u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2eku71u.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgz23usd.fsf@gnu.org> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47086-done Cc: 47086-done@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, rprior@protonmail.com, packaging-guix@libremiami.org, Raghav Gururajan , Roberto Beltran X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > BTW, note that =E2=80=9Ctrivial=E2=80=9D changes (usually considered as= =E2=80=9Cless than 10=0A> lines=E2=80=9D; a package update definitely fa= lls into that category) are not=0A> even copyrightable.=0A=0AWe'll make s= ure not to add a copyright for trivial changes. Thank you for clarifying = that.=0A=0A> The other option obviously is to register LibreMiami as a no= n-profit,=0A=0AWe are in the process of incorporating LibreMiami as a non= -profit. Till then, we'll include individual authors on separate lines of= the copyright header. =0A=0Aall the best,=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0AMarch 18, 202= 1 5:48 AM, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" wrote:=0A=0A> Hi!=0A> = =0A> "jgart" skribis:=0A> =0A>> I discussed this furth= er with LibreMiami members and we are thinking about the following soluti= on=0A>> to=0A>> this issue:=0A>> =0A>> We would still author commits as L= ibreMiami with our group email, packaging-guix@libremiami.org.=0A>> All t= he co-authors would be listed in the commit body, as usual.=0A>> =0A>> Li= breMiami would not be mentioned in any copyright statements going forward= . Instead, we would add=0A>> the=0A>> copyright statement for each contri= butor at the top of the file.=0A>> =0A>> We might have several individual= s contributing in one packaging session. Would this pose any=0A>> issues?= =0A> =0A> Nope, that sounds good!=0A> =0A> BTW, note that =E2=80=9Ctrivia= l=E2=80=9D changes (usually considered as =E2=80=9Cless than 10=0A> lines= =E2=80=9D; a package update definitely falls into that category) are not= =0A> even copyrightable.=0A> =0A>> For example, there's a possibility tha= t we might have 10 new contributors in one packaging session=0A>> and the= refore 10 new copyright statements at the top of source code files that m= ight get introduced=0A>> in that one session alone.=0A>> =0A>> This was o= ne of the main reasons why we collectively agreed on adding LibreMiami's = copyright=0A>> statement to the top of source code files.=0A>> =0A>> What= are your thoughts on this matter? Should I move this to a mailing list d= iscussion?=0A> =0A> I see. If there are literally ten people for each pac= kaging patch you=0A> submit, that could be a lot.=0A> =0A> The other opti= on obviously is to register LibreMiami as a non-profit, to=0A> have its m= embers formally assign it copyright on their work, at which=0A> point =E2= =80=9Ccopyright LibreMiami=E2=80=9D makes perfect sense.=0A> =0A> HTH!=0A= > =0A> Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:14:31 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator