Subject: Re: bug#47086: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3.

From: Efraim Flashner <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:15:43 +0200

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> "jgart" <[email-masked]> skribis:
> 
> > From ab371a326536a91f7e1caa288e25a9a0818e2b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: LibreMiami <[email-masked]>
> > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:49:11 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (tig): Update to 2.5.3.
> >
> > Co-authored-by: jgart <[email-masked]>
> > Co-authored-by: donotshake <donotshake:matrix.org>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> However I agree with zimoun that assigning copyright to LibreMiami is
> debatable.
> 

Is it really that different than everyone involved assigning their
copyright to LibreMiami as an aggregator and then sending the patch in?

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <[email-masked]>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted