GNU bug report logs - #47067
28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling through dispnew.c

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #125 received at 47067 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>, 47067 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47067: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] Crash while scrolling
 through dispnew.c
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:03:20 +0000
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:24:28 +0000
>> Cc: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>, 47067 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 11:10 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> > > From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>
>> > > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 08:53:04 +0000
>> > > Cc: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>, 47067 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> > >
>> > > It's c-beginning-of-statement-1 that I think is the immediate caller.
>> >
>> > It's nowhere in the C backtrace, only its caller
>> 
>> But it was in one of the previous backtraces?
>
> Too many moons ago.  The ABI was bumped since then, and so did the
> *.eln files.
>
>> > > Can you disassemble the function around 0x09c32285 (or, in another
>> > > dump, whatever calls Flss), particularly the 256 bytes or so before
>> > > that EIP?
>> >
>> > Below.  The updated address for the caller of Flss is 0x09d82285,
>> > which is not in any function whose name is known to GDB.
>> 
>> That's normal, assuming you didn't compile with comp-debug > 0.
>
> If that's normal, why did Andrea say that he didn't see such "??" in
> his backtraces?  And if that's because Andrea builds with comp-debug
> above the default zero, then I think either the doc string or the set
> of values (or both) need to be updated:

On my x86_64-pc-linux-gnu system I've always seen the all the function
names (no ??)  even with no debug symbols, see my other backtrace
(compiled with the default comp-debug 0).

Thanks

  Andrea




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 44 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.