GNU bug report logs - #47058
28.0.50; Dired Z: insert-directory: Reading directory: No such file or directory, CrossLine_linux_x86

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 47058 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arthur Miller <arthur.miller <at> live.com>
To: Marco Centurion - URI <mcenturion <at> fing.edu.uy>
Cc: 47058 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47058: 28.0.50; Dired Z: insert-directory: Reading
 directory: No such file or directory, CrossLine_linux_x86
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:06:45 +0200

Marco Centurion - URI <mcenturion <at> fing.edu.uy> writes:

> Arthur Miller <arthur.miller <at> live.com> writes:
>
>> Marco Centurion <mcenturion <at> fing.edu.uy> writes:
>>
>>> I can confirm that this bug is present and pretty easy to reproduce.
>>> Steps to reproduce:
>>>
>>> ----
>>> $ touch test1
>>> $ tar czf test.tar.gz test1
>>> $ rm test1
>>>
>>> In dired, press Z (`dired-do-compress`) when the point is on test.tar.gz
>>> ----
>> I just did all those steps in emacs -Q, and I can not confirm any errors. I
>> named files exactly as you show there, and decompressed file is correctly named
>> 'test1'.
>>
>> I tested in two different directories, you three shell commands from terminal
>> (st in my case), and Z from dired created correctly test1.
>>
Ahh, sorry, I saw just the mail I answered and thought the bug was about that.

> Yes, the file is correctly decompressed.  The original report is about
> an error message that shows up in the minibuffer "Reading directory: No
> such file or directory, test".  And that's what I was able to reproduce
> without having to download the file linked in the report, something that
> I guess a lot of people wouldn't want to do.
>
>> Press 'g'.
>
> I do that, I just thought that it's a bit of a weird behaviour that
> sometimes after pressing Z the dired buffer is consistent with what's
> actually in the directory and sometimes it's not.  That is all.
> Personally I wouldn't be opposed to reverting the buffer after every
> operation that modifies files, but I'm sure most would and with good
> reason.
Yes, it would be more consistent if all changes were reflected immidiately. I
have global-auto-revert-mode on, so it helps a bit, but I still have to
sometimes press 'g' to refresh the dired view.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.