GNU bug report logs -
#47042
gnu: qtsolutions: Enable examples.
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 47042 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 47042 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47042
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:10:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:10:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Leo!
Currently with this patch, we have following issues:
[1] When examples are enabled for QtSingleApplication, it doesn't get
linked to QtLockFile. (Try building without `;; Disable building of
examples for QtSingleApplication.` block)
[2] For installation of examples, the binaries get installed in sub-dirs
as `/bin/foo` instead of `/bin`.
Any ideas?
Regards,
RG.
[0001-gnu-qtsolutions-Enable-examples.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47042
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 47042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2021, 06:09 -0500 schrieb Raghav Gururajan:
> Hi Leo!
>
> Currently with this patch, we have following issues:
>
> [1] When examples are enabled for QtSingleApplication, it doesn't
> get
> linked to QtLockFile. (Try building without `;; Disable building of
> examples for QtSingleApplication.` block)
Then I guess we have to rewrite that Makefile (or pseudo-Makefile) in
the snippet as well?
> [2] For installation of examples, the binaries get installed in sub-
> dirs
> as `/bin/foo` instead of `/bin`.
I don't think the compiled examples need to be installed at all –
rather their source code etc. should be installed to share/doc (in a
qtsolutions subfolder of course). The act of compiling them is merely
a check, that they (plus the code they are an example of) "work as
intended" or at least compile as intended.
If I read your patch correctly, I made an indentation mistake during
the review process, is that correct?
Regards,
Leo
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47042
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 47042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Leo!
> Then I guess we have to rewrite that Makefile (or pseudo-Makefile) in
> the snippet as well?
>
> I don't think the compiled examples need to be installed at all –
> rather their source code etc. should be installed to share/doc (in a
> qtsolutions subfolder of course). The act of compiling them is merely
> a check, that they (plus the code they are an example of) "work as
> intended" or at least compile as intended.
Never mind this patch then. I started working on this, thinking that
example binaries might be useful. So I'll close this report.
Regards,
RG.
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
bug closed, send any further explanations to
47042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
Request was from
Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:55:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47042
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:02:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 47042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Leo!
>> Then I guess we have to rewrite that Makefile (or pseudo-Makefile) in
>> the snippet as well?
>>
>> I don't think the compiled examples need to be installed at all –
>> rather their source code etc. should be installed to share/doc (in a
>> qtsolutions subfolder of course). The act of compiling them is merely
>> a check, that they (plus the code they are an example of) "work as
>> intended" or at least compile as intended.
>
> Never mind this patch then. I started working on this, thinking that
> example binaries might be useful. So I'll close this report.
FWIW, can you merge the attached patch please? It enables building of
examples, except for qtsingleapplication.
Regards,
RG.
[0001-gnu-qtsolutions-Enable-building-of-examples-except-f.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47042
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 47042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2021, 10:00 -0500 schrieb Raghav Gururajan:
> Hi Leo!
>
> > > Then I guess we have to rewrite that Makefile (or pseudo-
> > > Makefile) in
> > > the snippet as well?
> > >
> > > I don't think the compiled examples need to be installed at all –
> > > rather their source code etc. should be installed to share/doc
> > > (in a
> > > qtsolutions subfolder of course). The act of compiling them is
> > > merely
> > > a check, that they (plus the code they are an example of) "work
> > > as
> > > intended" or at least compile as intended.
> >
> > Never mind this patch then. I started working on this, thinking
> > that
> > example binaries might be useful. So I'll close this report.
>
> FWIW, can you merge the attached patch please? It enables building
> of
> examples, except for qtsingleapplication.
I don't think the problem with disabling examples is bad enough to
warrant this kind of "hot fix". I'd rather patch in all examples at
once if that's possible.
Regards,
Leo
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47042
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 47042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Leo!
> I don't think the problem with disabling examples is bad enough to
> warrant this kind of "hot fix". I'd rather patch in all examples at
> once if that's possible.
Cool!
Regards,
RG.
[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 79 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.