GNU bug report logs - #47028
Discourage single-character package names

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 47028 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 47028 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Discourage single-character package names
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:44:52 -0500

Hi Tobias,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> writes:

> Mark H Weaver 写道：
>> Yesterday, an obscure package called "t" was added to Guix.  We
>> should reject such short package names in Guix unless there's a very
>> compelling reason to keep them.
>
> I completely agree (in fact I can't compel myself to find 
> excusable exceptions), but this wasn't explicitly documented 
> anywhere I looked.

We have one notable exception in Guix: "r", which is "grandfathered in"
so-to-speak, but perhaps it would have been excusable anyway, given its
prominence and its large number of related packages "r-*".

I fully support your proposal to talk about single-character names in
the manual, and also to check for them in the linter, but perhaps "r"
should be whitelisted.

    Thank you!
       Mark

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.