From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:33 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#47: 23.0.60; 'default' face not set properly in new frame Reply-To: Tim Van Holder , 47@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Tim Van Holder Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+monnier=iro.umontreal.ca@gnu.org Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:15:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 47 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12051651934600 (code B ref -1); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:15:05 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Mar 2008 16:06:33 +0000 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.pppoe.ca [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m2AG6Tp8004594 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:06:31 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgArAHD51EfO+JwVQWdsb2JhbACBVohkhjoBAQEeCBJWRJcQgQc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,474,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="15794853" Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 12:06:06 -0400 Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.156.21]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id QTQ32206 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:06 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 510FD805A; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:06 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-ID: Resent-To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:06 -0400 X-Original-To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Delivered-To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Received: from perlin.iro.umontreal.ca (perlin.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.51]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D414D2CF896 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:34:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by perlin.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CF814821C for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 07:34:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXbmP-0005Cj-OG for monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:29 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXbmA-0005CK-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXbm9-0005Bu-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXbm9-0005Br-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:13 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXbm8-0001O4-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:13 -0500 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JXbm8-0004q6-LF for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXbm5-0001NK-F5 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:12 -0500 Received: from 179.75-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be ([194.78.75.179] helo=mail.anubex.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXbm5-0001Ml-31 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 07:34:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18474D5C613; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:34:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anubex.com Received: from mail.anubex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.anubex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywyfMD7imFvi; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:34:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from leeloo.anubex.internal (177.75-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.75.177]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1526D5C616; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:34:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from tim by leeloo.anubex.internal with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JXblz-0005jC-O2; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:34:03 +0100 From: Tim Van Holder To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:34:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87zltapvb8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Cc: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+monnier=iro.umontreal.ca@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+monnier=iro.umontreal.ca@gnu.org X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-1.94, requis 5, BAYES_00 -2.60, RECEIVED_FROM_NOUNK 0.66, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: emacs-devel-bounces+monnier=iro.umontreal.ca@gnu.org In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2008-03-07 on leeloo Windowing system distributor `RealVNC Ltd', version 11.0.3370 configured using `configure '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' '--with-x' '--with-freetype' '--with-xft' '--with-libotf'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default-enable-multibyte-characters: t While in an ediff-buffers session, I executed M-x make-frame to get a new window. That newly created window did not have the correct font set (it used Adobe Courier while I have the default face customized to use the Terminus font). M-x customize-face default showed it as "SAVED and set" with courier as the font family. "Reset to saved settings" caused both frames to be repainted, using the correct font. Another M-x make-frame once again used the wrong font, so it seems something goes wrong during frame creation causing new frames to get an incorrectly set default face. From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:33 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#47: Reply-To: "James Aguilar" , 47@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "James Aguilar" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 47 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 47-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B47.12136547244830 (code B ref 47); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:25:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_SUBJECT,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NOSUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 47) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Jun 2008 22:18:44 +0000 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5GMIeUt004824 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:18:42 -0700 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so3874542rvb.1 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:18:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=+vQc/QTWsGzDBAmxvPC/gzx4nsQ5mh6sA22PHRVPlYM=; b=JbqZfpQjWHk5nJqnIqKAlzdW9xk7Qg9tK2dGRJJQVkw9ozt/P71dm8xqY5ok2FNoTI v1ueQk07cR7lCKCZY22Gg8k8wpawq8kaNaWzmxGydglv2+wNSiLPjGIz+bWYJufKDCCu cZISs+Uowsc8nW+MztmwxgvXbyod1iqFF2bsY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qHYRr6WPgNPP9mcKBjKT+v7839B+DssZKggQsWe3BBXY4sWdrH8HatO4oCpxE/mZtt A29KZ3y6syUPYsrHEQ7oBwHKaMk2gbiXNIreezOgg8fSBkHMhbC6VY+WKSgxVuO+2YMj 5MeauJ/puHIoB1shfcSsfxh6uL3mslpnTcMAk= Received: by 10.142.240.9 with SMTP id n9mr2592812wfh.136.1213654720485; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.39.5 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:18:40 -0700 From: "James Aguilar" To: 47@debbugs.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14285_567634.1213654720481" ------=_Part_14285_567634.1213654720481 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I was able to get around this bug by specifying the following in my .Xdefaults file: Emacs.FontBackend: xft Emacs.font: Consolas-7.5 Then doing xrdb -load .Xdefaults. (Beware, xrdb seems to silently discard the last line of the file if you don't terminate it with a newline.) This gets me the desired behavior on new frames. Emacs is the only program out of the half dozen I regularly use that was unable to specify its own font. In fact, it is the only program I have _ever_ used that falls into that set. I'm sure there are very good explanations and/or historical reasons for this, but it's a serious pain point. Another data point: I originally observed this problem on an emacs matching with the following version string: GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2008-06-16 This is the emacs I checked out from CVS yesterday. I have another emacs with the following version string: GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2008-05-15 If I use this emacs on my desktop workstation, I have no issues with new frames and fonts. But if I use the same source, compile it, and load it on my laptop (the same machine on which I originally encountered the bug), I have the bug. This convinces me that there is some interaction between emacs and my computer that is present on one machine but absent on the other that is causing this issue. I've checked xrdb and there's nothing to explain the problem there. I have no manually set fonts in either except when my workaround is active. I don't know where else to look, but I do have two machines to diff if you guys have some suggestions or things you would like me to copy. -- James ------=_Part_14285_567634.1213654720481 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I was able to get around this bug by specifying the following in my .Xdefaults file:

Emacs.FontBackend: xft
Emacs.font: Consolas-7.5

Then doing xrdb -load .Xdefaults.

(Beware, xrdb seems to silently discard the last line of the file if you don't terminate it with a newline.)

This gets me the desired behavior on new frames.  Emacs is the only program out of the half dozen I regularly use that was unable to specify its own font.  In fact, it is the only program I have _ever_ used that falls into that set.  I'm sure there are very good explanations and/or historical reasons for this, but it's a serious pain point.

Another data point: I originally observed this problem on an emacs matching with the following version string:

GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of 2008-06-16

This is the emacs I checked out from CVS yesterday.

I have another emacs with the following version string:

GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2008-05-15

If I use this emacs on my desktop workstation, I have no issues with new frames and fonts.  But if I use the same source, compile it, and load it on my laptop (the same machine on which I originally encountered the bug), I have the bug.  This convinces me that there is some interaction between emacs and my computer that is present on one machine but absent on the other that is causing this issue.

I've checked xrdb and there's nothing to explain the problem there.  I have no manually set fonts in either except when my workaround is active.  I don't know where else to look, but I do have two machines to diff if you guys have some suggestions or things you would like me to copy.

-- James
------=_Part_14285_567634.1213654720481-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:33 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#47: 'default' face not set properly in new frame Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 47@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:05:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 47 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 47-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B47.121384079424398 (code B ref 47); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:05:06 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FAKE_REPLY_C autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 47) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Jun 2008 01:59:54 +0000 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.pppoe.ca [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5J1xoI9024392 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:59:51 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4FAH9aWUjO+KWv/2dsb2JhbACBW682 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,669,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="22945040" Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2008 21:59:44 -0400 Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.165.175]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id ZHA26544; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:59:44 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E90D8832A; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:59:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: 47@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:59:43 -0400 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I've made some changes (in the trunk) to the way the default face and the `font' frame-parameter are handled. This should fix the problem where changes to the default face applied via Custom did not apply to new frames. Please test and report if you still see the problem, Stefan From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:33 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#47: Font is correct, but potential bad side effect Reply-To: Tim Van Holder , 47@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Tim Van Holder Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 47 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 47-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B47.1214213608704 (code B ref 47); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:40:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 47) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 23 Jun 2008 09:33:28 +0000 Received: from mail.anubex.com (179.75-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.75.179]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5N9XLA8000697 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:33:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD1CD5CD6F for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:33:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anubex.com Received: from mail.anubex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.anubex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvYxsh69GxIE for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:33:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.14.160] (177.75-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.75.177]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088221B9651 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:33:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <485F6DD6.5060903@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:33:10 +0200 From: Tim Van Holder User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 47@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The font in a new frame (via C-x 5 2) is now correct. I do see a new problem though (first noticed it last Friday): I have a width & height specified in default-frame-alist (132x60), and that no longer gets applied when I start emacs (the exact size I get seems to be somewhat nondeterministic - I've gotten 132x57, 126x55, 116x52, ...). Is the size perhaps being computed with the courier font and then not getting updated with the new default font? Side note: I did not get an email from the bugtracker when Stefan added that status update, which I assume is a bug in the bugtracker configuration... From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:21:33 2025 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#47: closed by Chong Yidong (Re: 23.0.60; Default face in new frames) Reply-To: "Tim Van Holder" , 47@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: "Tim Van Holder" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 47 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 47-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B47.12167979247424 (code B ref 47); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:35:03 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 47) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 23 Jul 2008 07:25:24 +0000 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m6N7PKw8007418 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:25:22 -0700 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1032079ywj.31 for <47@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:25:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=lr74tvsrv9EvQlY65SEKim2i/lJgHGUQe60DsEHbjUg=; b=pgGpQS64dC9wku/Q7PM3yJPAQVj3d9DtR9ODFFZ6wuttKM+8F1c7Y7p+lzN7p/vZB5 mfnD3LtSeinIXQsPnfmRqUzxSLjeYOn3mTLZz8yLHb4BaUYVudXHJ2Zr9Hx26jw0LVPQ IDNu5KRfPjcWr5BeMaSQLHlQQMUFPxlWtvOG4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=rtI3ugLy17DeBXO6IqT9df12C5Dg82PrX7yIC0Uo3eIF4Q6poJxCMpQISvSjstbrEF mHb1ingFryszVOuBUY3b2izD0rhCknKYe+TcyogKylE0TOf+HRnHU0Jcx+JbzvS3KWXI n5OLOLyn1L6vcCd+/g/BxyknGgHJexjpVLQC4= Received: by 10.150.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr6780814ybz.48.1216797920277; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.12.15 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:25:20 +0200 From: "Tim Van Holder" To: 47@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <87zlo9gooy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zltapvb8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> > From: Chong Yidong > To: 120-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:22:05 -0400 > Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Default face in new frames > I believe this is now fixed in the trunk. While this is true for the originally reported issue, that is not the case for the frame size issue I reported on bug #47. But I'll add a new, separate bug for that - it was never certain that it was caused by the fix for #47.