GNU bug report logs - #46982
28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active (and vice versa)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, yantar92 <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#46982: 28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active (and vice versa)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 19:08:30 +0300

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> gmail.com>,  46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:19:37 -0400
> 
> >> >> It might be a good thing to mention somewhere around
> >> >> `clone-buffer`, yes.  I'll see what I can come up with.
> >> > Hmm... we don't document `clone-buffer` anywhere that I can see.
> >> > Any suggestion where I could put that kind of info?
> >> `clone-indirect-buffer' I think. For example, in 19.6 Indirect Buffers
> >> section of the manual.
> > Yes, there, please.
> 
> How does the patch below sound to you?

LGTM, thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.