GNU bug report logs - #46982
28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active (and vice versa)

Previous Next

Full log

Message #26 received at 46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#46982: 28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect
 buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active
 (and vice versa)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 05:36:00 +0300

> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 07:29:05 +0800
> 
> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> 
> >> It might be a good thing to mention somewhere around
> >> `clone-buffer`, yes.  I'll see what I can come up with.
> >
> > Hmm... we don't document `clone-buffer` anywhere that I can see.
> > Any suggestion where I could put that kind of info?
> 
> `clone-indirect-buffer' I think. For example, in 19.6 Indirect Buffers
> section of the manual.

Yes, there, please.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.