GNU bug report logs - #46982
28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active (and vice versa)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, yantar92 <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#46982: 28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active (and vice versa)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:28:23 +0300

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: yantar92 <at> gmail.com,  46982 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:29:54 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii [2022-06-17 08:42:33] wrote:
> >> It's currently the responsibility of the code that sets up the indirect
> >> buffer(s) to setup a `before/after-change-functions` in the base buffer
> >> that runs (some of) the `before/after-change-functions` in the indirect
> >> buffer(s) where they are needed.
> >
> > Do you think we should document this caveat in the ELisp manual?
> 
> It might be a good thing to mention somewhere around
> `clone-buffer`, yes.  I'll see what I can come up with.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.