From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 01 03:07:10 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 08:07:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGdaA-0001c3-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 03:07:10 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42036) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGda8-0001bw-Hw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 03:07:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGda7-0004HC-TJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 03:07:08 -0500 Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19]:33730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGda5-0004DD-IY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 03:07:07 -0500 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id aw6w2400R0mfAB401w6wuF; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:06:57 +0100 Message-ID: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> Subject: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. From: Maxime Devos To: bug-guix@gnu.org Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:06:49 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-E3upuf4bGN937WR3bMGe" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1614586017; bh=eDxSGco2MCoEvAByZfj2c73idWFxTssVXrpUDdjkMus=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=f0hS0B7+bdLTZLEIuNs5WO8eeHKdQleBM2x+BtQP0OADL2YFQR7+GGgmcKG8Q94V0 EcqtBCbaqvIDEOdgKA6SF9khmp39OWVDB2TdhRE9xvp/wDuohNxcco28oaZOw2I5Gt UDJhGU0+qog7K0r6dHp4xPNz4eCW51fMQJyW2iQEbHs+vf7WsjmieW+6DIGol4GLnb fV018QMVsFMDDh+lDLKF6jgTq4JkW0ximLe90bgsx5X5IxVuHV/mDQF4FT8gz4nWPf 3757w62cOSvLo9B938O44So9u+PkNl5SGzW83jmWEv80P9ioyuKzCnCK7HEKeOYoJ7 6UnaNVhF6vUjg== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=laurent.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-E3upuf4bGN937WR3bMGe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Guix, guile2.2-bytestructures and guile2.0-bytestructures don't compile. The reason seems to be that v1.0.9 uses (scheme eval), which isn't defined in guile2.0 and guile2.2. v1.0.8 doesn't use (scheme eval) Here's the commit that seems to introduce the issue while fixing another: guix time-machine --commit=3D0a1da4652d9bb93d530ca52710f30b5d05a4251d -- bu= ild guile2.0-bytestructures guile2.2-bytestructures According to a "guix refresh --list-dependent guile2.0-bytestructures guile= 2.2-bytestructures" on 372b15f8625e7f20cafdba2677d4bf3f5eccc127, only "guile2.0-git", "guile2.2-parted" and "guile2.2-guix" depend on these packages, so unless someone needs "guile2.2-guix", it should be safe to remove these packages. Greetings, Maxime. (This issue prevents creating an environment for https://issues.guix.gnu.or= g/46826) --=-E3upuf4bGN937WR3bMGe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYDygmhccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7o50AP9cx1z24oHKVTMUkl+uk8Qq2Ip2 qQn67vse1csfi1o5KgEAv8dJLkQLchNdukeGl63IC0R43Pvd0M07r7vHbMux3gc= =Hwtx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-E3upuf4bGN937WR3bMGe-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 01 09:14:30 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 14:14:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJe-0006p0-22 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJc-0006on-VD for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJU-0000zv-QX; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:22 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=54232 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJR-00026W-10; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:18 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Maxime Devos Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:14:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> (Maxime Devos's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:06:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87h7lvrmfc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 Cc: 46844@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, Maxime Devos skribis: > guile2.2-bytestructures and guile2.0-bytestructures don't compile. > The reason seems to be that v1.0.9 uses (scheme eval), which isn't > defined in guile2.0 and guile2.2. v1.0.8 doesn't use (scheme eval) Perhaps worth reporting upstream. > Here's the commit that seems to introduce the issue while fixing > another: > > guix time-machine --commit=3D0a1da4652d9bb93d530ca52710f30b5d05a4251d -- = build guile2.0-bytestructures guile2.2-bytestructures > > According to a "guix refresh --list-dependent guile2.0-bytestructures gui= le2.2-bytestructures" > on 372b15f8625e7f20cafdba2677d4bf3f5eccc127, only "guile2.0-git", > "guile2.2-parted" and "guile2.2-guix" depend on these packages, > so unless someone needs "guile2.2-guix", it should be safe to remove > these packages. =E2=80=98guile2.2-guix=E2=80=99 exists mostly to check compatibility with 2= .2. I=E2=80=99d like to drop 2.2 support soonish, though it=E2=80=99s okay to keep as long as it= =E2=80=99s not a burden (which it=E2=80=99s slowly becoming). Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 01 09:48:06 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 14:48:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjq9-0003PR-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:48:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com ([209.85.208.48]:44247) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjq8-0003Oq-9u for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:48:04 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id g3so21030909edb.11 for <46844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 06:48:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MTFG8sMGOYUtSensV/lgQMs1XgHo21Q5OiDgbfLyyIE=; b=Lm+5Gk1MxNVp/edyXk2zfCuwCMyCh4n9ZfKawj6Ac6rZSxw4NBCNF8qumVNnIMb2P6 IGqC7EndAgvkHkKYZTuL6zhU0m2FmGNuc7CkmCDtxP+eP/Q/36rKnykeqk6MlQMNscAb DTMmFyC/YRZ6jQ9pMF7iDZWDOo1HFttuii1pja8n2R9L41DqWTdXx426gw0LNKdWuyXf AWvXKQCzTSbJz4fgxnKd899Jjv4l5pioiF+WmV+0wkhptsVI1HBSwleCcHmD93KlMvrT 2FFFTjpFrDokM2DN8Il20QdR6Knsmz86IWITOPegsUfBkuz19J/pQLBdx6Y2DcYptvNd wEfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MTFG8sMGOYUtSensV/lgQMs1XgHo21Q5OiDgbfLyyIE=; b=BHZaWPgjeAAzbcg9hYw4Ke0hD5WUIkmCGetvl9px6BNqI7MGgW+T8bFaXXjEdw/+Kz TS0KfLbz/Q+HKdz0yogilXJGh2iJEqszhHxSiHvlJEiRWxrCx4dvauxNt3vKUdg36ovC vf8kndTOZ5jifpnSr4CHqx1pKdKa0IF/TxH1bT5UOhRVRDArk3m5KRaqH0GAL+F9ZAXH sHzXXlVU9CXBc12r96oFlEsiSVDSuE0Ra5+pN1q3yGxl+YkGB2h8ygTYDH2QFV9vcES9 l4qMhNv//zk6V+3wzr8/ztyh7CGs7C9I1cUkJjdgyHrM3ohtNV0JyPKoCH+BnVrQUS2N OR+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SAcro+6M3CniRX2uDaOlsJvRSf1zPZE8VAu3FpQPeA+wnxm5e VxKrYVcpprwiePNESJ4T9BOlr0kCx7Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPqoHEA2wHuV4qylAeHZAB+QJkZOZ7IhbCNnnNOPfUJm+Lk3cAk3c3T7lcnyVC+CHCnW3bXA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3590:: with SMTP id y16mr16888095edc.21.1614610078375; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 06:47:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([109.90.125.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12sm2551255edx.91.2021.03.01.06.47.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 06:47:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. To: Maxime Devos , 46844@debbugs.gnu.org References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> From: Taylan Kammer Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:47:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 01.03.2021 09:06, Maxime Devos wrote: > Hi Guix, > > guile2.2-bytestructures and guile2.0-bytestructures don't compile. > The reason seems to be that v1.0.9 uses (scheme eval), which isn't > defined in guile2.0 and guile2.2. v1.0.8 doesn't use (scheme eval) > > Here's the commit that seems to introduce the issue while fixing > another: > > guix time-machine --commit=0a1da4652d9bb93d530ca52710f30b5d05a4251d -- build guile2.0-bytestructures guile2.2-bytestructures > > According to a "guix refresh --list-dependent guile2.0-bytestructures guile2.2-bytestructures" > on 372b15f8625e7f20cafdba2677d4bf3f5eccc127, only "guile2.0-git", > "guile2.2-parted" and "guile2.2-guix" depend on these packages, > so unless someone needs "guile2.2-guix", it should be safe to remove > these packages. > > Greetings, > Maxime. > > (This issue prevents creating an environment for https://issues.guix.gnu.org/46826) > Thanks for the report, I'm looking into it. Actually 1.0.8 is the first version that uses '(scheme eval)' and 1.0.9 only makes a change to the environment argument passed to 'eval'. I'm assuming that the last working version was 1.0.7. The reason '(scheme eval)' is needed is that I use the 'environment' procedure to create an environment object to be passed as the second argument to 'eval'. I suppose I could instead use 'resolve-module' which should work across 2.x and 3.x. I'll report as soon as I have an update. - Taylan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 03 09:56:16 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2021 14:56:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSv9-0006U6-S5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:56:16 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:34248) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSv7-0006U0-PD for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:56:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id hs11so42767862ejc.1 for <46844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 06:56:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=erSPrVyjoHGP/2Aogf8hv6U9BmznBxRGPOkkSXyMoNo=; b=C507S55LjBMfC1c7cLNEJ22CTW3/25BItH1C7ghJMcZOZDF3yEKuBPylTG2TUqEja5 hhWW+baen1uCRO2DaLuUektzPwwvsxpECZG4aCFRCgefS/L38dNtUMXfHfwjoOTDRFrD wluA+aJ5aHNk7Y/7qEDtVCUrKuqaJJEX9ZemSPYoa2A1paVRYywv926wHZiyMtX4FpZh 3lbSzsp6lekfIAy8mSucEmyX90hBPVazA0O8zEaP55k8YLkU2zhnw2uQ4NOJnBS8MHRn x/nG9PUbuuknhVqD9gaiwv3XryxUPVKQJW7TFkA0nhxjN6w0zT+ukM4XLmeMf3VkzmW1 TocQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=erSPrVyjoHGP/2Aogf8hv6U9BmznBxRGPOkkSXyMoNo=; b=pVFBagRZzDUjALYgzKixHDduaJY8IRH3/xfrDeAueAtWG2y5YHcSm4igKYwNzZeFco 1OtHWUVDj2Iyika5z/JzLJxnF3ANIR7hrxz8mS9Ri5uYgjyTfoGcp9bNr88chHFAQVkC zeMaACDtH74O9q1CMRPNcHkcU19UrUFT+t4EayR6wbcxTQrO3bFk0jLiWAXtW/uQCiNr PFhj31WvDTPw3RpzXd9je1gMfaJfGD1+HnBPnG++bPwJnX8q9tfdYzCkQG+IIyFNFGM7 1iKk8L0qL6SOzqf5qm77IFjliS5qLrM0if4dua5agIxwtOf9mXWKGUQKU/InYzHq2Jf4 zYJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BQAZ8NAaPYW4y1BgdxhiRaj6M34kkjsNixe/Eu3pld4TpSMph whHZpIeMXmx2R2PqBcG7YYrGW4DFOmk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXLWHpr4drJbhh7T3oY2qCkc0Dfazvv8VauIuJEJqEJpLYUrSEIofmlZvWGgLhrBtv35Kliw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9709:: with SMTP id jg9mr19006586ejc.276.1614783367805; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 06:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([109.90.125.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm18911275ejd.42.2021.03.03.06.56.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 06:56:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. From: Taylan Kammer To: Maxime Devos , 46844@debbugs.gnu.org References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> Message-ID: <13c054b7-223d-42b3-cc4c-b58609013cf5@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:56:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 01.03.2021 15:47, Taylan Kammer wrote: > I'll report as soon as I have an update. I just released 1.0.10 which should work across Guile 2.0, 2.2, and 3.0. I haven't yet updated the Guix package for bytestructures. I'm quite out of the loop and don't remember which branch that should be pushed, given it's a dependency of Guix and all. Is it always safe to push to master? (With regard to rebuilding the whole world.) - Taylan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 05 10:36:54 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2021 15:36:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lICVZ-0004Py-Rk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:36:54 -0500 Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.88]:45464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lICVX-0004Po-T3 for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 10:36:52 -0500 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id cfcp2400S0mfAB406fcpzi; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:36:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. From: Maxime Devos To: Taylan Kammer , 46844@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:36:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <13c054b7-223d-42b3-cc4c-b58609013cf5@gmail.com> References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> <13c054b7-223d-42b3-cc4c-b58609013cf5@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hbvfBgdaU7QiMkxOMoQv" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1614958610; bh=/EQK7IaFlHDMauZ10JCfMs6yb260xoo2QkX2Iiq5ChI=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=VV2bf6EYDxtYJc0IQ96APf21RdVM88HGSMYtw6ZHkj/7y3VVkZp5sTtC6O8G90/mc 2kgHCH9zenWGFqy266uHpynffLmjVqZhCZ+acOA5gm7RALTW+NRDsGupVud7JZoyhI m3ou1JjLVUih0tv+6w7l12bpnePWpr+ySXM14XUXSq3PCknvm9Yp5HMMcBrKa/toNO xIpa6vOEpWwjONQRip+ijI4LPy6tu3j/7FAU1wXsab6L12ZdUQ6NSU0Z0osfhoeTX8 TLKVFWRyCbPM7y/GuzEMEH7CwERiccM9niJQmc3LM4Z16u5KNAbIdwUReLz2AL76ao PLT10RKIEmkkA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-hbvfBgdaU7QiMkxOMoQv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 15:56 +0100, Taylan Kammer wrote: > On 01.03.2021 15:47, Taylan Kammer wrote: > [...] > I haven't yet updated the Guix package for bytestructures. I'm quite > out of the loop and don't remember which branch that should be pushed, > given it's a dependency of Guix and all. Is it always safe to push to > master? (With regard to rebuilding the whole world.) Let's see what would be rebuilt: $ guix refresh --list-dependent guile-bytestructures guile2.0-bytestructure= s guile2.2-bytestructures Building the following 15 packages would ensure 19 dependent packages are r= ebuilt: guile-wiredtiger@0.7.0 guile-libyaml@0-1.f5d33a6=20 guile-parted@0.0.4 guix-data-service@0.0.1-25.b7ba8d0 guix-minimal@1.2.0-13= .a53f711 cuirass@0.0.1-72.543e26a emacs-guix@0.5.2-3.a694fdb=20 guix-jupyter@0.2.1 guix-build-coordinator@0-20.1f79fc3 gwl@0.3.0 hpcguix-we= b@0.0.1-5.9de6356 guix-daemon@1.2.0-13.a53f711=20 guile2.0-git@0.4.0 guile2.2-parted@0.0.4 guile2.2-guix@1.2.0-13.a53f711 I suggest you run "./pre-inst-env guix build guix" first to make sure guix = can still be built, but otherwise there shouldn't be any issue with pushing to master= . Maxime. --=-hbvfBgdaU7QiMkxOMoQv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYIADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYEJQBxccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7gHmAPwOy7qpsrUvXwbLjBw86UKj9dB/ VsaW5ZtaVED4JA+kzgD/c2VFjfDAuDYWIcM3VEke1uMRUnT+SyKXQvijLZjh4g4= =07bb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hbvfBgdaU7QiMkxOMoQv-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 10 14:11:06 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 19:11:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK4Ec-0005Zp-MR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:11:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:33056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK4Eb-0005Z9-0v; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:11:05 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id jt13so41004038ejb.0; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:11:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qcTf3UyX4VhPhwiIoEU7EXvCK4w7SquEVws/YidO65k=; b=AkCWuXIOyWsIsenYdJXETUQyOicFRMT5QGnOVu2KmZHriArWvnWYO/mpbTkTynP3w7 lzmHo3ynyeOzAk3hxAYtrB/ofSTLX3cDVECHzU8K79GhSy8TV6Zf5BSjxVWmtz77cf6A G0PdW+Rs2IAK6LuQd+eidno1DPcZqxJckuRPzcp/VTZAt8zEZ7iTBscUGys9Y1QQPVNr 9HGMdry4uWMnJ/p+riRQ6w5QYX3rgG0ml3JzbM/Fxaceuvs+WMLfZtpkHP9csxxNyJ74 fYlxqGoGq+wOZed7CHXrlO9sxL+xMTryBDXZITUCorSrpNtfLKpLNIlQF7icvqjO0BdU lvyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qcTf3UyX4VhPhwiIoEU7EXvCK4w7SquEVws/YidO65k=; b=isAMNA7fVL7EZOp/riaMtVyV1SoIeK3b70wAYchgvZblw/Yz+GaGZAu054Fy2zlYVr 3uUZIcCTAcD1VIuzPcOnwQRv/q4775rbfo4QLi00c2klEHw0ElKOBSVJRT/uCUzfH4PU +AdMiHgQYncBefDJVVvCldFVA+JPW/ZPjGuiW46u3KYQwYLwlkzDWdpTDDVmL+jj4vqc eXieIDcl4M9NFe6tBCv1/qQIx8UZqUy85we3yV5QRm4XakkG2N35zfeAed7giz1Iyo6T NJItZWqgxvxZV75KXRbyT06MqB3JF9SQRPFI2hfGlj8FE5FIKCRQIBAfXzfU+JEvQ0pW BmTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531r73Aw7m7geXK2HhKro6u8DJNp2MNglQxjzU1DPTKz9ZKFkWTU OljUv2QNfIJ85AkPiJ/PqaPkwf8Gvoek3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+EECJhyT+jAzoBN04eFVIyWmPyORW5QhDgdNd9jmzXTuEx0qjt7ywT1MfdWcT3pWTd8p9Rg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7c43:: with SMTP id g3mr5181847ejp.210.1615403459282; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([109.90.125.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm21sm167703ejb.100.2021.03.10.11.10.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:10:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. To: Maxime Devos , 46844@debbugs.gnu.org, 46844-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> From: Taylan Kammer Message-ID: <71c3a56c-b039-1242-95dd-1c8eaacd664e@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:10:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I just pushed the update to guile-bytestructures 1.0.10 to Guix master, and guile2.2-bytestructures builds for me. - Taylan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 10 15:12:18 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 20:12:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK5Bq-00070H-Bb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:12:18 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:44685) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK5Bp-000702-Kl; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:12:17 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id t13so12660291qta.11; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:12:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SS6sC1dEl2zOabPMJspIgnqPRPfV3oJMxZ2VpXv6qF0=; b=dEjD0JPCnqRBkXt2P7un6/1NCZZNgDm1mEdnxg87YF16f7URAPwVJ92TG+E4OhXX/y 3t5xI6MFNfDhSkIyTm2/lanWxYqv+5awHouvf1Osj5O7hQv14mOw1d4NEAmid5TqKScJ JuFfJXNFNPMywMvBmzZsI034Iyz8eSgVVO4vdFchfsdSz+9glqcoEu6DnitX0uneiFSK 3k6LYy8hNRvrKL5jsqa9V7KmF+48JVRuCR8K+XIjn6RngC9jqSC2pEgnt6/IyrfNQhaj d8L51exKruuAQAFxEW4JUFCadMrcDCiWdH83ahTvug3BddWqrSc/TM+9bes1aX05QNBB eSUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SS6sC1dEl2zOabPMJspIgnqPRPfV3oJMxZ2VpXv6qF0=; b=Jy9udr4Db4ZZrHgLiQeoFfxXRn8+GITWAlkNOA/mMMyJtfbKKn8P1Bp+OMc+a+B1mR 8wAmQSKUP2nioVWuuNhjyLwoLkaGtQXI7MUmNSNIu8ODp+mYUdbx8t9UHi9rYQQFcrLg Yv+ONpfqcfqMhH9OKvmeiE0iADxvE9qY9dxxnQIxvdPPZZZDcbJ39pwF9N5Y1sjw0gd8 pPiN5m10D5Cic3DXgH18/B0yigna3tohxnLEKlmGIGaCXCvT08b05vFwdl5gfPDchgZX 0bTRSRHkDQUNFsrtoVasPZUP9PCowH8zJ7EKulzVz5/t7tACcFODwDGTRnl879/pwQtD tIXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cInkjG4miQyd95S3OciCeO4A2bNQVDP0kLTnAj65Wax5SomJZ +xA8NOcM3SgvgQaAmXMAPcjM7h2G1GEFQJYkjqsRwbws X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ4VInjN+OwnkxFOT4fIo00kF/GgHQ7LbL4o0Nqw7P6TS5aeVut4ysDPDGCVLS8oDFTGBv8iWHTKuj/4Jb+bw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:42:: with SMTP id y2mr4365115qtw.186.1615407132167; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:12:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> <71c3a56c-b039-1242-95dd-1c8eaacd664e@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <71c3a56c-b039-1242-95dd-1c8eaacd664e@gmail.com> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:12:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. To: 46844@debbugs.gnu.org, Taylan Kammer , maximedevos@telenet.be Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 Cc: 46844-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:12, Taylan Kammer wrote: > I just pushed the update to guile-bytestructures 1.0.10 to Guix master, > and guile2.2-bytestructures builds for me. Just to say that the commit breaks "guix pull". Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 10 15:55:58 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 20:55:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK5s6-000859-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:55:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:39824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK5s4-00084p-7X; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:55:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f49.google.com with SMTP id p7so30160071eju.6; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:55:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UgyS/t2mLxTsUqyI+fBqwe5gSBlO+YhmCekEFY4/8EU=; b=q4BcShl4q1RtwxXwpCkWt4KBOb9v/qYH34g4OOUo4rmowshWH8UEzM+IH2oLcXiBdR IdHs0AXdXlpRLVjb/Ioa1ylPaBhYBSjVOAeYHQQV3HD36G+ZVGLgtaB9Z1vRX1arOkUj nKvuIbqW8XCvbEk/4oxKDYPOGGHaJg0pz725F5SGH9gm+FNrsKIL40wR3SwcucnxnhY3 DRnhjxubeGp61ffmaFERlvCXpAsDhh7j3ekjlI0/s56oanG1G6lg7V4wxhRZ2TtgGtEj P+Lr1NCWPT61O73xM28+nOw41mLn1laEl8xaqjcMojrLlSTKF2aLkYoXgn2fCwR/wl1y stsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UgyS/t2mLxTsUqyI+fBqwe5gSBlO+YhmCekEFY4/8EU=; b=NlgYctPiaFIkhUtRUujhgd3MQRHG6N1Jiq55dBkOL+rNjkxeCIfOgMReNF4h4Gx7LV 0x4VFCjs72+gHGKZj12OWbmFiKaiDFqVKdwz7Qa4V4FlUrT/Fhl8BnCwzN97pipZ2HPd KhtS1cu+DkIYTa3G46jj8BuHoluNMqkf/ARBYm9MYit58H+bG2SjUxLyooKTU5QaPAh2 Td8bi9eSPfmtINgGv8m042RoVDwBWaCLiKTxd/v7/h/jd+4hor8qKb1micJgso+JcaLc xuKXjrHYumH23tqRp3+44zHEw+XLNccrzMWSeaK888HECXJQWP4eFW3/ZGvGAhhhlH4q BTvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eaGKqWt6K24nHqxFjTKz6QF1TwjAtDHvGV0sQPiJSxaaCRFPm iOwtSihrRcv/T2fzy2nNOSqqI2LJh2ywkSQB X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOKn62uAsC27bip2WVT2QgVP/r5HqFb0OCUeyJN5yZmyUN8f2JLQwoUC6z4vfCHekInJYBgw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:aa2:: with SMTP id bz2mr288454ejc.239.1615409750161; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([109.90.125.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mc10sm273690ejb.56.2021.03.10.12.55.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:55:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. To: zimoun , 46844@debbugs.gnu.org, maximedevos@telenet.be References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> <71c3a56c-b039-1242-95dd-1c8eaacd664e@gmail.com> From: Taylan Kammer Message-ID: <41e96e07-2525-11ef-aaf2-d6f8824b6ca8@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:55:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 Cc: 46844-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 10.03.2021 21:12, zimoun wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:12, Taylan Kammer wrote: > >> I just pushed the update to guile-bytestructures 1.0.10 to Guix master, >> and guile2.2-bytestructures builds for me. > > Just to say that the commit breaks "guix pull". Ugh, sorry. Looking into it now. - Taylan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 10 16:11:33 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 21:11:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51997 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK67B-0008TM-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:11:33 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:45333) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK67A-0008T8-AY for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:11:32 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f45.google.com with SMTP id mm21so41548485ejb.12 for <46844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:11:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=75sSxmOsyyFCTgvsKJrqhz9/UVy7aCZyoWxNK7DTnIU=; b=XHqazpBwTJY8m8f/nqALVyeAwsA0XkeEC5CViQM2Xes6sgSu6he3G+/Jk2skPIOtps 7pruzLVBpviHP4gzCHSDjlbdbZftyrFFYT05ejQ3GBgK/mtfcsTlD6MQI83kc0IaybkA 8aGCtOO+s1bCtZ6n84vEDr61TLFMMmrdGfIOxmCClSoJ6To6TMKo2EHjX+W6uHEF1Bih qvc4Ts4jXDb38PLGHF9u0KZOGjZvBotYNEkxp/1R+T0NB6FVNTnpbHTsF7DEcUkvYCr9 fTfu9H1U336RgFF1BJluMOAUwCbUu+9npwS9WLvKCdzbrJk9S0mLLYSH2rZiCNBHz7cn d4ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=75sSxmOsyyFCTgvsKJrqhz9/UVy7aCZyoWxNK7DTnIU=; b=fqjAi9MdzDViCGLDtk5jfmFrlzLci7TM6viecNiM6RfFbYBHwHRwxbzuqGdrUhqOto 0wbekr/0B3jaRmA8zc9yFXHIQL1FHz4GyExcUac2rx7ReVNOxnh7/6XCTuZ9kS6KVsZ3 hK+PH0+2nHLrwU7T9ljiGsz0qfgWPJqqKvuWTIUmlE1PgWovknGxVpSo3Cy5DLEoJNIY l3TnRYMUqwBTgT0N96KEnQO8hA81EeMoPz25L0UBQLZGnbB04Ss8qlP6xM/OpMQK8xbU I9TP3gvHrQ67gyVUkFORw8Dkds4diTi+oZQ5TbObWygsdEwbnJdoh4I2BcGSD17HSzcy jBtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vfx+dcGbmgPCpRGWiISXLPJiEWPX7WU7DSiQS2r1VWrCU+kjX NKvvdMbgxdJy9JX0iROBzDM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbkrdLaiuuxzstEzvREjaGjNiwAjjD1D4/BMpzOOvNpyr0AEpbzMOI/eKGxr3OAal6xnnLog== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ad96:: with SMTP id la22mr355450ejb.237.1615410686427; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([109.90.125.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d23sm226428edt.19.2021.03.10.13.11.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:11:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. From: Taylan Kammer To: zimoun , 46844@debbugs.gnu.org, maximedevos@telenet.be References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> <71c3a56c-b039-1242-95dd-1c8eaacd664e@gmail.com> <41e96e07-2525-11ef-aaf2-d6f8824b6ca8@gmail.com> Message-ID: <41aee6f6-b4ae-f033-0f57-a3910d53dc59@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:11:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <41e96e07-2525-11ef-aaf2-d6f8824b6ca8@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 10.03.2021 21:55, Taylan Kammer wrote: > On 10.03.2021 21:12, zimoun wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:12, Taylan Kammer wrote: >> >>> I just pushed the update to guile-bytestructures 1.0.10 to Guix master, >>> and guile2.2-bytestructures builds for me. >> >> Just to say that the commit breaks "guix pull". Hmm, I can't seem to reproduce. Guix pull finished successfully for commit 6c5d358cc25ca94d9c0c75a3a086e81b2d63d1b6 (two commits after mine). tkammer@debian:~/src/guix$ guix --version guix (GNU Guix) 6c5d358cc25ca94d9c0c75a3a086e81b2d63d1b6 Copyright (C) 2021 the Guix authors License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 10 16:45:03 2021 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2021 21:45:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK6da-0000qK-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:45:02 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]:45727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lK6dZ-0000pZ-60 for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:45:01 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id m186so1929051qke.12 for <46844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:45:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=62EcI1phvy0ta0KOz5WRV969OeGgL0ZmNht1B6skKV4=; b=f2fOvdpBszV9Z/EyJ5sDDFU3RlW8zv/oQG0HZzJV804EIxu4ZhoEZpoFGzbKXo71yb t+8Dw/dYiY/yqo5FltaQHnQsbS54MLYZqiFvAb2/v7GXVJ+TIkSZPOHxn35jRqHp+YT5 tSPss23I3+5uAaXk8Mu6uME3F9ue1HTI+g7dEgn2lEWp8gnN9JC5LWTM453hZ2lg0e6t /uiwBbqMBmr7Ke1Ym/0MdL9hbFwstz6U+eYO8PMLtwZ0UiXME+yJTZTRQj8nkKTH7jvm TLvbg0eh92oNdvQIV6rWGcjtJQlh050Hn0ZtKH2RoE/ENhQtp57KXmBhJoUZgvNzkH9a nbxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=62EcI1phvy0ta0KOz5WRV969OeGgL0ZmNht1B6skKV4=; b=k1R5y06UPRdMZYiNSs8wEHwn4yaON0qh4fWUuTl8h+cz5GWDvTv1+LtjkDj1cu0B7C hGc/tQqnYf3e8rV+60sxTtwYZnkvnYP1NOftOSCeN7k1S5T+X2hVahh6F6d+h+NQA6D6 qdI9VShRn3TTNOVTqLARY4bXd17KC8/pvSIrpIFh7YPxasJCAUpWnt9CzLRR7EjEIHlv TGxVBc8j46G9byrj2NmVYCeUvVpAGCjlPDaPijC3hZItgey45UPfaP6gnl1uypjAfM3A VgLnKBeSjq0VBQFF3z3aNlYj9O3T36q9Y4KkmMqKSSh00BFEe9pf+gh/m6XEi1LzFZ5Y 4p1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xcUPPLORhEW8TjXgevURtzWblRKa1Xnay/SEtpLD/YhABGwa2 TANGZ7QmkuyA42ikGQ7xq+/tiqK3g1EKPI899B4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg80sW1g490Yo7v6yDKKGeOrQmaOmCGCw1CYdek1xkp+hV9NEWbqzRIuwnUkxUSBiv8DDIZPT6OR6CtTNMPQs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:630:: with SMTP id 16mr5121623qkv.304.1615412695617; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 13:44:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> <71c3a56c-b039-1242-95dd-1c8eaacd664e@gmail.com> <41e96e07-2525-11ef-aaf2-d6f8824b6ca8@gmail.com> <41aee6f6-b4ae-f033-0f57-a3910d53dc59@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <41aee6f6-b4ae-f033-0f57-a3910d53dc59@gmail.com> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. To: Taylan Kammer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46844 Cc: 46844@debbugs.gnu.org, maximedevos@telenet.be X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 22:11, Taylan Kammer wrote: > >>> I just pushed the update to guile-bytestructures 1.0.10 to Guix master, > >>> and guile2.2-bytestructures builds for me. > >> > >> Just to say that the commit breaks "guix pull". > > Hmm, I can't seem to reproduce. Guix pull finished successfully for > commit 6c5d358cc25ca94d9c0c75a3a086e81b2d63d1b6 (two commits after mine). No worry and all is explained there: Cheers, simon From unknown Tue Sep 09 18:21:58 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator