Subject: bug#46819: 28.0.50; Undesireable warning: Empty let body from the `benchmark-run' implementation

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:13:24 +0100

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> It'd be easy to put an explicit nil in the loop's body, but....
>
> The idea was that in actual (non-macroexpanded) source code, empty let
> bodies are usually the result of a misplaced paren.  But it's probably
> more often annoying than useful since we can't easily distinguish a "let
> from source code" from a "let from a macro expansion".
>
> So I'm also voting to revert that change.
> Any objection?

It is a nice and helpful warning, though, so if it could be fixed in
another way, that'd be great.  (But I have no idea how, of course.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no