From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 26 07:08:46 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 12:08:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbvK-0000ty-Mf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:08:46 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45092) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbvJ-0000tr-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:08:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbvI-0003CE-Vk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:08:45 -0500 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:37716 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFbvH-0000v5-74 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:08:44 -0500 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1614341318; bh=FAYtZuiO88WX+G3jg5B5ZJNfwGLNppR39bLYuuua1cU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=epvvP3N3xA+c9+GQMtRGQStPcey17/q16sjrRfTzrAiU/i7wtPHjSgv53h1iYU/eE FlC6KkfWqTzK9s++5g8xmp6hUxrG6K1PqwuITn7AfRi0dRMo1ZY+CWQ9Kp5CRPqk/d EUrqekT42mWRQkmFbrT/YZRN14nM1oshGjT0jlnQ= To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: nmap: Update to 7.91. Message-Id: <420d4559223c8c219c5562db3989a7b5446b083d.1614341257.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:08:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=87.96.130.155; envelope-from=public@yoctocell.xyz; helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.472, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.941, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/admin.scm (nmap): Update to 7.91. --- gnu/packages/admin.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm index cf27eea084..79d41b9ed5 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm @@ -2706,14 +2706,14 @@ done with the @code{a [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) * gnu/packages/admin.scm (nmap): Update to 7.91. --- gnu/packages/admin.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm index cf27eea084..79d41b9ed5 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm @@ -2706,14 +2706,14 @@ done with the @code{auditctl} utility.") (define-public nmap (package (name "nmap") - (version "7.80") + (version "7.91") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "https://nmap.org/dist/nmap-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "1aizfys6l9f9grm82bk878w56mg0zpkfns3spzj157h98875mypw")) + "001kb5xadqswyw966k2lqi6jr6zz605jpp9w4kmm272if184pk0q")) (modules '((guix build utils))) (snippet '(begin base-commit: 099026df5ba6443a9291e8f9d91ccacfdce2f00d -- 2.30.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 26 07:17:16 2021 Received: (at 46793-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 12:17:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFc3Y-00016U-IB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:17:16 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:40139) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFc3W-00016F-2B for 46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:17:14 -0500 Received: from guix-xps.local (82-64-145-38.subs.proxad.net [82.64.145.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11QCH7hc059476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:17:07 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 11QCH7hc059476 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=zaclys.net Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1614341827; bh=1mp/m1yw2ogdxauBKE8eCFmrqfSlY1nzguJv6poTAP4=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=R5YkwedH01YKV1ZuB35qUsdzQ/uzWb1z7JE4XTF6eCjBH0KBEFaChgZ+WFdh4igP4 3HzbVVHjlUFzPdcYBHlYFW3G3Mm4iKYQv20MR21lBpS082/nUn5pU5gqAGfGtybnGN oyA9jkjOnyJBPMx4b3q0m3QEnOm69YJhNFAv3Vd4= Message-ID: <9555eeeb0f93acf66d9e1287756b421bcf754dbc.camel@zaclys.net> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: nmap: Update to 7.91. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: 46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:17:06 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oAyrPijMDunIgf4psLlI" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46793-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-oAyrPijMDunIgf4psLlI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! nmap 7.90 and later has uncertainty around licensing. See:=20 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D2dba37e27a75c4a8ffa= c324d419c020f1b900d66 Due to this, I will not merge this patch. Thank you anyway! --=-oAyrPijMDunIgf4psLlI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmA45sIACgkQRaix6GvN EKZUiw//cQeNRtZi5gnFaWrogXA1H+fTb/V1Z2T4MEQMjyMwCWURFIhf+bUIonGT 91o/AiSG6bn85qYx7hZLutHdKIi5fYtMpBgS4mXvxfVQ6GLt9+LW1MMcgMsUy7F8 oviIwt8SBN5tAoKqvu7rXPjpbnyHBJXloBQva1kWcwVJto03o55As+J8IVnUg59Y J5tb2G5vaVOZmhBdJ0Al7Nj56DfE3ck0fzkx8p8cc+tHO4F5kmNWwGg1Wk8x/Myn TgEmsr5IQcidArKjs/JH2MPu/R5q2UrxAcNLDGfPsLnuqcZJilGLUXlltw8DuFZL 1OHm8y46AV1oAItCTBlrtQ8N45vM/mLeJwIz4xGVfsryKZQq9OsRwQEYbHmVyR7M bSvaUmLqEqd4qdrdVNcpXOwroYj+5pHYoAYJK0QTdMwNXXTrKIGEhm5qhATmITzw OViYTKcTegP1c08vPRfncWvrdXzbc6dERTbcSq+mbybxDZOMBq+K1raIsTv+W3UG S6E8pEMn5BreDMxMViopOveUiZn1BHUA+RQl1VuofGw/vSUzKs5H//ifgaJBZiec oqwbqrjPdz5fyr67oFSiagSsdM2mq2Ilwqvm8QVhoV/N+5Xew93/JLvvLeKe6WhZ Al4bEcQ/P0QdfTnugI2xJ+XojJxnVc6ICCSXSamjppu/SUu4aAg= =FlRk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oAyrPijMDunIgf4psLlI-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 26 07:38:14 2021 Received: (at 46793-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 12:38:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40421 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFcNq-0003fx-Ic for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:38:14 -0500 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:46606 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFcNp-0003fj-56 for 46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:38:13 -0500 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1614343085; bh=tEJPbgEbezhtv1gmviqam6II+HrTCUj880/5Ml7BUOY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=C1/DZ0AOMBNLgZfnGTaMNzLbt0rtVsKnVEUUF+Nh3jENyXMBDgs65lkwjEv+3c+eN 0/PFNI53QyokRnZs851WHJjhlby2dw119tzCyY9S/uIcTu6QAK2NGtcecF8vRM/vIh 1wMj005Nr0ijw102Qx68cSzQnvoWVqf1GBemzTmI= To: =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter , 46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#46793: [PATCH] gnu: nmap: Update to 7.91. In-Reply-To: <9555eeeb0f93acf66d9e1287756b421bcf754dbc.camel@zaclys.net> References: <420d4559223c8c219c5562db3989a7b5446b083d.1614341257.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <9555eeeb0f93acf66d9e1287756b421bcf754dbc.camel@zaclys.net> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:38:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87pn0ngg2c.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Feb 26 2021, Léo Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > Hello! > > nmap 7.90 and later has uncertainty around licensing. > > See: > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=2dba37e27a75c4a8ffac324d419c020f1b900d66 > > Due to this, I will not [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46793-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Feb 26 2021, Léo Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > Hello! > > nmap 7.90 and later has uncertainty around licensing. > > See: > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=2dba37e27a75c4a8ffac324d419c020f1b900d66 > > Due to this, I will not [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager On Fri, Feb 26 2021, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > Hello! > > nmap 7.90 and later has uncertainty around licensing. > > See:=20 > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D2dba37e27a75c4a8f= fac324d419c020f1b900d66 > > Due to this, I will not merge this patch. Sorry, I wasn't aware of this. Thanks for letting me know. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 26 09:50:16 2021 Received: (at 46793-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 14:50:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40532 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFeRc-0006o6-Kx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:16 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com ([209.85.166.42]:43095) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFeRa-0006nq-Rz for 46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:50:15 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id f20so9848473ioo.10 for <46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:50:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ksYBpPGtH7gOB/wMk3vH11PbSP/l4ZGHXFajMqXK4AY=; b=idzvK1scDijbKo8+ViHsQduvXBgoegFQvpcw3jnCYtGbu58hnbZQqUN/t+Sfe0nVu6 8HYbEHCbnnJvXmLUdT6bCeYNbex21HWaEo8HJars3N8CBQaJgOR5aewxW/vH7rUcRY/B uZ9cCSRkuXbwEkQd0sUEjAG9j1t5dIC2ckf8Svy8aoRT3RNtEDCypcktzAINpWsn/8RE ENm6uHaEnc7RAJgufoxcrryY3abW2u2760OybrkAuCrAXOb8tmNYaAXRx0EsXibfLdR2 P56tnKm0RWUlodU7vnxk6NjVOozsYNKUfRaHwP2v7XeN1VL/wDVpThGKl3mEhjBU3XNs NbaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ksYBpPGtH7gOB/wMk3vH11PbSP/l4ZGHXFajMqXK4AY=; b=KI/4JJkgeqLIrg5cLb3DE09yGU/tECtKN2H7cnru4qWEX8fgcQ++7RG6OUZmxSKSrL fq8532SlHIKtlIdk05DOopz7e3qNEM8LJvsLbngyeSkIl/xtggg07Ac6gPnCLHRJhyzj qxsVvAv69/qujA8sZa38FFc8cV1rT5rQTtFQRNZeeWNSVrhLrJCfRQM+r/6bfEJfjI5F 7nCHP3sgjGPHiwfzdCvfr19beLDir/Bf3/exSdltvEagey9dgV2OaMvShTKF22h+RuPB rtYgAHlFTUFOQxwy2rcsoPPpi78BVQ66l78Uf2P2BEDFtBxyEKIRdyFfIsy4DAZkbQ1c 3scA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313LhS8cqg0XIWqCyftOX4ig5OxnV5SOpVh2mroT0iDpLbsW1xh p5hReAtslTkS+4vnsW85JrL/TKd4bO29F8K+PBzjpGgaNxKC8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBYf3msad7gACm6SIjRhfIJg8Zhzl8ZD4ol3IxC7+K2g6OPW9VMJH2NKFSB0zA+Yalz5/vGWIDEjwLS6dHL8k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:2721:: with SMTP id m33mr3217359jav.59.1614351008774; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:50:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <420d4559223c8c219c5562db3989a7b5446b083d.1614341257.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <9555eeeb0f93acf66d9e1287756b421bcf754dbc.camel@zaclys.net> <87pn0ngg2c.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> In-Reply-To: <87pn0ngg2c.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> From: Greg Hogan Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:49:57 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bug#46793] [PATCH] gnu: nmap: Update to 7.91. To: Xinglu Chen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006bd59605bc3e620c" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Could we add a comment above the nmap version summarizing the situation to prevent a recurrence of this incompatible update? mongodb looks to be similarly blocked but I do not see a notice. On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:39 PM Xinglu Chen wrote: Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.9 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.166.42 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.166.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46793-done Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o_Le_Bouter?= , 46793-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) --0000000000006bd59605bc3e620c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Could we add a comment above the nmap version summarizing the situation to prevent a recurrence of this incompatible update? mongodb looks to be similarly blocked but I do not see a notice. On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:39 PM Xinglu Chen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26 2021, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > nmap 7.90 and later has uncertainty around licensing. > > > > See: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D2dba37e27a75c4a8f= fac324d419c020f1b900d66 > > > > Due to this, I will not merge this patch. > > Sorry, I wasn't aware of this. Thanks for letting me know. > > > > --0000000000006bd59605bc3e620c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Could we add a comment above the nmap vers= ion summarizing the situation to prevent a recurrence of this incompatible = update? mongodb looks to be similarly blocked but I do not see a notice.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:39 PM Xinglu Chen <public@yoctocell.xyz> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26 2021, L=C3=A9o Le B= outer via Guix-patches via wrote:

> Hello!
>
> nmap 7.90 and later has uncertainty around licensing.
>
> See:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D2dba37e27a75c4a8ff= ac324d419c020f1b900d66
>
> Due to this, I will not merge this patch.

Sorry, I wasn't aware of this.=C2=A0 Thanks for letting me know.



--0000000000006bd59605bc3e620c-- From unknown Tue Jun 24 22:38:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator