GNU bug report logs - #46784
[PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Alexandros Theodotou <alex <at> zrythm.org>

Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:44:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 46784 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: 46784 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout <at> zaclys.net, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Nicolas Goaziou 写道:
> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause 
> BSD is
> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about 
> zero-bsd?

I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested ‘bsd-0’ to Alex 
:-) that accuracy is implied or valuable.  Guix maps 
‘n-clause-BSD’ to ‘bsd-n’, we get (marginally) fewer requests to 
add ‘missing’ licences, all is well with the world.

It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text; 
that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence.  That requires 
claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is 
a... certain kind of correct.

Kind regards,

T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 131 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.