From unknown Mon Aug 11 19:06:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. Resent-From: Alexandros Theodotou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 46784 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Alexandros Theodotou X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161429659116295 (code B ref -1); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:44:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 23:43:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHn-0004El-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:11 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52248) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHk-0004Ed-L2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHk-00031s-Ca for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:08 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.141]:60416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHh-0006yZ-3E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:08 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B4116005C for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:42:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Dmq7q6zTvz6tmK; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:41:59 +0100 (CET) From: Alexandros Theodotou Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:41:49 +0000 Message-Id: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.141; envelope-from=alex@zrythm.org; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) * guix/licenses.scm (0bsd): New variable. --- guix/import/utils.scm | 1 + guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/guix/import/utils.scm b/guix/import/utils.scm index 2f5ccf7cea..09be1bf3dc 100644 --- a/guix/import/utils.scm +++ b/guix/import/utils.scm @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ of the string VERSION is replaced by the symbol 'version." ;; Please update guix/licenses.scm when modifying ;; this list to avoid mismatches. (match str + ("0BSD" 'license:0bsd) ("AGPL-1.0" 'license:agpl1) ("AGPL-3.0" 'license:agpl3) ("Apache-1.1" 'license:asl1.1) diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm index 1091eee67c..34a94093df 100644 --- a/guix/licenses.scm +++ b/guix/licenses.scm @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ (define-module (guix licenses) #:use-module (srfi srfi-9) #:export (license? license-name license-uri license-comment + 0bsd agpl1 agpl3 agpl3+ apsl2 asl1.1 asl2.0 @@ -124,6 +125,11 @@ ;;; ;;; Code: +(define 0bsd + (license "Zero-Clause BSD" + "https://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html" + "https://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD")) + (define agpl1 (license "AGPL 1" "https://gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html" -- 2.30.1 From unknown Mon Aug 11 19:06:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> In-Reply-To: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> Resent-From: Alexandros Theodotou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46784 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Alexandros Theodotou Received: via spool by 46784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46784.161429745917655 (code B ref 46784); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 46784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 23:57:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQVn-0004ag-3u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:57:39 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.141]:54476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQVj-0004aR-J3 for 46784@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:57:38 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E81F160060 for <46784@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:57:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DmqTh2qXGz6tmJ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:57:28 +0100 (CET) From: Alexandros Theodotou Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:57:15 +0000 Message-Id: <20210225235716.22162-1-alex@zrythm.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) * guix/licenses.scm (bsd-0): New variable. --- guix/import/utils.scm | 1 + guix/licenses.scm | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/guix/import/utils.scm b/guix/import/utils.scm index 2f5ccf7cea..64d1385164 100644 --- a/guix/import/utils.scm +++ b/guix/import/utils.scm @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ of the string VERSION is replaced by the symbol 'version." ("Apache-1.1" 'license:asl1.1) ("Apache-2.0" 'license:asl2.0) ("BSL-1.0" 'license:boost1.0) + ("0BSD" 'license:bsd-0) ("BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD" 'license:bsd-2) ("BSD-3-Clause" 'license:bsd-3) ("BSD-4-Clause" 'license:bsd-4) diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm index 1091eee67c..0a36067387 100644 --- a/guix/licenses.scm +++ b/guix/licenses.scm @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ apsl2 asl1.1 asl2.0 boost1.0 - bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4 + bsd-0 bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4 non-copyleft cc0 cc-by2.0 cc-by3.0 cc-by4.0 @@ -159,6 +159,11 @@ "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Boost1.0" "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#boost")) +(define bsd-0 + (license "Zero-Clause BSD" + "https://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html" + "https://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD")) + (define bsd-2 (license "FreeBSD" "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:FreeBSD" -- 2.30.1 From unknown Mon Aug 11 19:06:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> In-Reply-To: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46784 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46784.161433405024583 (code B ref 46784); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 46784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 10:07:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFa1y-0006OQ-64 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 05:07:30 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:53761) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFa1w-0006OC-CJ for 46784@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 05:07:29 -0500 Received: from guix-xps.local (82-64-145-38.subs.proxad.net [82.64.145.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11QA7LiU037682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <46784@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:07:22 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 11QA7LiU037682 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=zaclys.net Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1614334042; bh=cilZw5ettq4qLYWb4Na1qZ/y5C54Pej+K0mhgqtvNIQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=Gc/+F9MBEdMw/o3+W4+coeOcTEt/24gpSmJP1Y0T7fQXoadL/1l33RXur1JahdNfn gxNNuP//pFbmnR/7glwZUOx+nZlKiyX1xY8UA1j0CYHq2MxafpxAWFhQbw5T5PiYIK 1HGXLjsM3BB3oBPCcmw2X5wNaVdaznb9rgIYf/lA= Message-ID: <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:07:21 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-o0f3iW6cxWAm5sEWjmr7" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-o0f3iW6cxWAm5sEWjmr7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello! Why did you send two patches here? Do I just take the first? Looks like that's what I should do to me. Thank you --=-o0f3iW6cxWAm5sEWjmr7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmA4yFkACgkQRaix6GvN EKb//A/5AUF2Bne2bxc9XSm6qBt67r7QBuRKzwRuAzbypKwsoRGmw0X6HqnF3dQr i1VRBOnhWLNRCSlImUYEVUXPlTk7xt11PqtB8b2evxzThr3hxhk2IRk7PtqP+GVo nqLrGRYkaWE8FREC8Gw5XnEl10sPaUK7ch2Ocyrv60MYGaKesyalo5RX1saunXLZ 5AaopxS6EOMAu+YJ/ANECwFKVi8fqCbf7gmG2nsN+9BW/+irHumqh6XM5JtQxqtx lqs+j8cfO4Kw8KBTqbKXuhJ67GgI4XbhxeknSjH+sFUCE/qee1O9VIljvm52KZ1G Ui4jhEJRS6BxrCIyeKkA1zeIQ0pVVkfp9qKCm2LdFAKwMI0P2u55WVuyK2KUXJlb HcR+tobS740HzZFvcj7YFJ6NN4qyEBtW8g8CzqCQwYz6wnVSJjk7ZWon2zyV3RGa z1w6Fcvaj4LS5kUb790NeNsAoSmLk2uvHoGT8hO1ZNvplVNYyGv/t5jzg0demSwe G/MsHov+r/8V9SS7bCfoL14Ep32jVIDjq26ZdPPsaT+tfrRh0xhCGwK+J7KBqoyN wLC+uCxQQpnoKgfnDoFB6yZyIwTHll/LQDA4L3Sr4PwjnspgT39SZgMMIlHdkWs3 OJofnpAyIXqJMMsudsdi0MCWalxA95OE38LC/xNoDF5QWcBECEo= =zXvY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-o0f3iW6cxWAm5sEWjmr7-- From unknown Mon Aug 11 19:06:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46784 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: lle-bout@zaclys.net X-Debbugs-Original-To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter via Guix-patches via X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161442714816714 (code B ref -1); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:00:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 11:59:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFyFY-0004LR-3k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:59:08 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:37930) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFyFW-0004LD-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:59:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFyFW-0006Fr-BZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:59:06 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:54955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFyFT-0005c0-K7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 06:59:05 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE55A60003; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:58:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net> ("=?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter via Guix-patches via"'s message of "Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:07:21 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.195; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hello, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter via Guix-patches via writes: > Why did you send two patches here? Do I just take the first? Looks like > that's what I should do to me. The first license patch introduces an invalid symbol. IIUC, Scheme symbols cannot start with a number, so 0bsd cannot be used as a license symbol. OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause BSD is not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about zero-bsd? Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou From unknown Mon Aug 11 19:06:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46784 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net, guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by 46784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46784.16144455596491 (code B ref 46784); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 46784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 17:05:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG32V-0001gd-9h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:05:59 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:38342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG32T-0001gS-DA for 46784@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 12:05:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=cXUaR2jHiOvve8fPGofZ1YsPmUXIehDlfEPWF708iOQ=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=ndfRRnSNA8cKu4M83sjMkkm2jyu5iPAAQBE1m hC0GRUEbgm96DITKjACDmVDGikwB9WVfayCdtX49kU8iFjibWDma6YZ6OpKQw0HtG7Kc9Y UypVSixQJxbIDv8SS1jrrBNJrXx+t778hwymn+xDYM9KdmnN3pG0wohFgm74jYrFSzkugQ UdtQTXpKcgVTVHYBxzuaAlrt1aX2d9oe136IUJq6gTowRl1L3Gy3aGgrVxgZXm6f4DOTeM sKYub2GDh1yGLECRZHjtA6STKns5kZphm7DRu31s5bUQglaJMnvgFltA3+YblSHdBu4tLO DQvBFsTTEd+d13JDqmqCjtFcg== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 35acd449 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:06:49 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net> <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> In-reply-to: <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100 Message-ID: <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicolas Goaziou =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause=20 > BSD is > not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about=20 > zero-bsd? I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99 t= o Alex=20 :-) that accuracy is implied or valuable. Guix maps=20 =E2=80=98n-clause-BSD=E2=80=99 to =E2=80=98bsd-n=E2=80=99, we get (marginal= ly) fewer requests to=20 add =E2=80=98missing=E2=80=99 licences, all is well with the world. It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text;=20 that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence. That requires=20 claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is=20 a... certain kind of correct. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYDp78w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15ZBkBANoH2vNhxjqhX5kOBsxs85RJvu5/Yq2pI8nIqMjX d1xxAQCofIzCm/ezpjQoyMOOWvjsWrcn8BEn0EVB5tU0Eu2FBA== =REG/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Aug 11 19:06:06 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Alexandros Theodotou Subject: bug#46784: closed (Re: bug#46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.) Message-ID: References: <87h7loimys.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 46784 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1615027322-2690-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1615027322-2690-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 46784@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 46784: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D46784 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1615027322-2690-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 46784-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 10:41:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMz-0000g9-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMt-0000fp-W6 for 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMn-000815-VF; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:01 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37878 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMn-00024C-Eh; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:01 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net> <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:40:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100") Message-ID: <87h7loimys.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46784-done Cc: 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net, Nicolas Goaziou X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Nicolas Goaziou =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause BSD >> is >> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about zero-bsd? > > I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99= to Alex :-) > that accuracy is implied or valuable. Guix maps =E2=80=98n-clause-BSD=E2= =80=99 to > =E2=80=98bsd-n=E2=80=99, we get (marginally) fewer requests to add =E2=80= =98missing=E2=80=99 licences, > all is well with the world. > > It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text; > that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence. That requires=20 > claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is > a... certain kind of correct. This is an interesting discussion :-), but in the interest of moving forward, I applied the =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99 patch. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1615027322-2690-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 23:43:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHn-0004El-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:11 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52248) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHk-0004Ed-L2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHk-00031s-Ca for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:08 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.141]:60416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFQHh-0006yZ-3E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:08 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B4116005C for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:42:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Dmq7q6zTvz6tmK; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:41:59 +0100 (CET) From: Alexandros Theodotou To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:41:49 +0000 Message-Id: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.141; envelope-from=alex@zrythm.org; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Alexandros Theodotou X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) * guix/licenses.scm (0bsd): New variable. --- guix/import/utils.scm | 1 + guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/guix/import/utils.scm b/guix/import/utils.scm index 2f5ccf7cea..09be1bf3dc 100644 --- a/guix/import/utils.scm +++ b/guix/import/utils.scm @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ of the string VERSION is replaced by the symbol 'version." ;; Please update guix/licenses.scm when modifying ;; this list to avoid mismatches. (match str + ("0BSD" 'license:0bsd) ("AGPL-1.0" 'license:agpl1) ("AGPL-3.0" 'license:agpl3) ("Apache-1.1" 'license:asl1.1) diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm index 1091eee67c..34a94093df 100644 --- a/guix/licenses.scm +++ b/guix/licenses.scm @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ (define-module (guix licenses) #:use-module (srfi srfi-9) #:export (license? license-name license-uri license-comment + 0bsd agpl1 agpl3 agpl3+ apsl2 asl1.1 asl2.0 @@ -124,6 +125,11 @@ ;;; ;;; Code: +(define 0bsd + (license "Zero-Clause BSD" + "https://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html" + "https://opensource.org/licenses/0BSD")) + (define agpl1 (license "AGPL 1" "https://gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html" -- 2.30.1 ------------=_1615027322-2690-1--