GNU bug report logs - #46782
guix environment --expose options cannot be layered onto $PWD

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:13:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: guix environment --expose options cannot be layered onto $PWD
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:12:34 -0500
Hello Guix!

I noticed, while trying to expose the SSL environment variable inside a
container and doing things such as:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix environment --container --network -E SSL --expose=$SSL_CERT_FILE \
     --expose=$SSL_CERT_DIR --ad-hoc [...]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

that it wasn't possible to expose things onto the implicitly mounted
current working directory.  No error message would be shown, yet the
--expose arguments wouldn't go through unless using --no-cwd.

Here's a minimal example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix environment -C --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp \
  --ad-hoc bash coreutils -- bash -c 'stat $PWD/tmp'
stat: cannot statx '/var/lib/jenkins/tmp': No such file or directory
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

but,

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix environment --no-cwd -C --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp \
  --ad-hoc bash coreutils -- bash -c 'stat $PWD/tmp'
  File: /var/lib/jenkins/tmp
  Size: 73728           Blocks: 152        IO Block: 4096   directory
Device: fd00h/64768d    Inode: 1966081     Links: 397
Access: (1777/drwxrwxrwt)  Uid: (65534/ UNKNOWN)   Gid: (65534/overflow)
Access: 2021-02-25 20:40:08.534757708 +0000
Modify: 2021-02-25 21:10:49.205636074 +0000
Change: 2021-02-25 21:10:49.205636074 +0000
 Birth: 2016-12-07 20:43:16.029221570 +0000
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

succeeds.

I can't think of a technical reason why layering bind mounts wouldn't
work; in fact it already appear to work for multiple --expose options
touching the same hierarchy of files.

If there's a technical reason this cannot/shouldn't happen, we should
warn the user about it.

Thanks,

Maxim




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 78 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.