GNU bug report logs - #46782
guix environment --expose options cannot be layered onto $PWD

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:13:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 46782 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: bokr <at> bokr.com
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46782 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bbb ee <blasforr <at> gmail.com>,
 Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#46782: guix environment --expose options cannot be layered
 onto $PWD
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 02:24:04 +0100
Hi,

On +2023-02-06 16:54:20 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > A naive question since it works when using the --no-cwd option.
> >
> > On ven., 27 janv. 2023 at 11:19, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >> guix environment -C --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp --ad-hoc bash coreutils \
> >>  -- bash -c 'stat $PWD/tmp'
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >
> > Is $PWD referring to the same thing?  Because one is outside and the
> > other is inside.
> 
> Yes!  See:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> maxim <at> hurd ~$ echo $PWD/tmp && guix environment \
>  -C --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp --ad-hoc bash coreutils -- bash -c 'echo $PWD/tmp'
> /home/maxim/tmp
> /home/maxim/tmp
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>

I imagine the created environment is COW[1]
[1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy-on-write>

Then your output above,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> /home/maxim/tmp
> /home/maxim/tmp
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
looks the same, but IIUC they have different '/' root dirs, the one
in the container being like an initrd separate file system.

Or is --expose meant to be a shared rw reference to the caller's memory
(directory content or regular file etc) from the start?
That would seem hard to keep safe, so I doubt that's the design.

How do the two tmp's stat? (Before and after writing content
like $PWD/tmp/foo ?

And foo doesn't appear in the caller $PWD/tmp/* right?

What is your use case goal for --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp ?

SFTN if this is useless distraction.
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 78 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.