From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:58:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46780: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 46780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 46780@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161428637624879 (code B ref -1); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:53:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 20:52:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39460 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNd1-0006TD-Q6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:56 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNcy-0006T4-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNcy-0003bn-GR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:52 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:59116 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNcw-0008FT-Dw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:52 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu.fritz.box (pd951f1a8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.241.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40A453FCE9 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:52:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:52:45 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/BFdUPU__eb1SS357oyX=Qeu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.151.27.109; envelope-from=bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de; helo=bjoernhoefling.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --Sig_/BFdUPU__eb1SS357oyX=Qeu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable java-snappy fails as a dependency of several Java evaluations, for example: http://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/120281?status=3Dfailed http://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/359649/log/raw These failures exist only on ci.guix.gnu.org, but locally it build perfectly, even with --rounds=3D100! Why? Because our buildmachine has too much memory :-) [And I can remember, we once had that for another package, I just can't remember again which one]. What should we do about it? Just disable the test, or something more complicated? Analysis: To analyze, I let it once fail with the -K switch to have the directory /tmp/guix-build-java-snappy-1.1.7.drv-0/ available. Enter the environment with $ guix environment java-snappy $ cd /tmp/guix-build-java-snappy-1.1.7.drv-0/ $ source ./environment-variables $ cd source $ ant check --> everything is fine. =20 Then increase the memory used by junit: Edit the build.xml file, add a huge "maxmemory" property like this : Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= , 46780@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46780-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46780.161437788529980 (code B ref 46780); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 46780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 22:18:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42728 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFlQz-0007nU-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:18:05 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:40277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFlQx-0007n1-PR for 46780@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:18:04 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id d11so10004473wrj.7 for <46780@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:18:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AmByawfHpXmy/qjs47vtFbbCey7UhYYpZZHcnmr+Rug=; b=h9ZhNSMXSKXdT7UhhzZKZ2kSZndG/KGaNQ3UH9/9nHSE1UPKet0eeoAq8y9+wMVxwU kO8lhfvpwlUsKdbQdKJ/+3wRP2pNWy3ObDP2sr2K9aieFcF6t9cc1CNwnbzmtfFdHyzP zm3OBNjcZSJoRVFqVEiDhX1smCxMalg5JNtI4bdMInz1IB3P5WGBfVz3YZSR0fnWXWsn qyiB/cMmiRAsTacm5kURB9gUep729byYSj0660aVf6aqG0NXPshbI+v7Fo11LnRUArCS w6/dyRnAtQUMNh0nL13Xkw8Dh3yf2FLM490oSoQIQPFrJB1KyZnAwk9fwHdT5DczTN0/ H51Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AmByawfHpXmy/qjs47vtFbbCey7UhYYpZZHcnmr+Rug=; b=qRHg7l6uQRUdCmXif95NzACeNY5a6UAFSQm0/GmAa8fL98C12VOmhiWcK+smkBt0ES wYSUcY4cpqsxH9ZlTAP02X0HlsYmidIX0Zw4j34a8ks56bLDNEnT7n9rjcC2OVXu6u8R PtDNh7wZC0mZGiH7ko5uv5KklD2Pg1Cqs/dDkPFMybg3ldPeMlqCMUw9VUY2Ixbcutzn cUGcYh+N4OmgICujrLfDZEWF3TfKaWr5qV4SPZM6U6FJFGnyn7L0rluTh+2SdgNk9DOi wW4SIhlpJ+J1KjDXJoz9ND6Ah/jQ4djO7dn4vXzh8IVgHxzEZ91x2hLT1rm4/vi3H0Di rB/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TeGLbZo7HTOq0yMrFqN1h+zm2lRvx4aCMyrmKVYPyVsO9kY/C n81jd+lzv2ULPkFsSneQofxsJYvDgZw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTuTpeb6AsI/PM99UHfkbfBqfYRAZ6NEOFtWUKBWoi4bxi69p5Tzcbett7sbQnOxS2UsA35Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:58c9:: with SMTP id o9mr5429226wrf.181.1614377877968; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:17:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15sm15283729wmd.41.2021.02.26.14.17.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:17:57 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> References: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:08:42 +0100 Message-ID: <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 21:52, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > Then increase the memory used by junit: Edit the build.xml file, add a > huge "maxmemory" property like this : > > If you look at the test case source code, it tries to allocate about > 20GB and hopes that this fails. It just does not fail on huge machines... What about adding a phase just before the test? For example in this build.xml file fix the max memory to 20G if it is greater. All the best, simon From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:58:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46780: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Cc: 46780@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46780-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46780.16144343343414 (code B ref 46780); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 46780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 13:58:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43434 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07S-0000sz-FW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:58:54 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:36170 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07Q-0000sp-Cj for 46780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:58:52 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (pd951f669.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.246.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4544A3FCE9; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:58:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:58:47 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20210227145847.3c0f5baf@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:08:42 +0100 zimoun wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 21:52, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling > wrote: >=20 > > Then increase the memory used by junit: Edit the build.xml file, > > add a huge "maxmemory" property like this : > > > > =20 > [...] >=20 > > If you look at the test case source code, it tries to allocate about > > 20GB and hopes that this fails. It just does not fail on huge > > machines... =20 >=20 > What about adding a phase just before the test? For example in this > build.xml file fix the max memory to 20G if it is greater. The build.xml is auto-generated by our ant-build-system. So we could add some parameter into it. But I found this too much of an overkill, and working on the ant-build-system would mean this goes into staging (we have too many Java package). Thus, at first I thought the idea with the additional phase wouldn't fit here. But at the second glimpse: The build.xml file definitely already exists before running the tests (even before build). So we could add a phase that substitutestars and adds the maxmemory parameter in the build.xml. Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EAREKAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCYDpQFwAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /UiIAJsFe5GxP2L/TQrGptQmVzy4/n6iUwCfcZBnrD9fYf8JyDSXX2R4UR3eBMk= =P3j9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:58:08 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: bug#46780: closed (Re: bug#46780: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org) Message-ID: References: <20210228002927.0d14cc92@alma-ubu> <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 46780 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 46780@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 23:30:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1614468602-9729-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1614468602-9729-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #46780: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 46780@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 46780: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D46780 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1614468602-9729-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 46780-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 23:29:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG91i-0002Vw-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:29:34 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:36280 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG91g-0002Vn-FZ for 46780-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:29:33 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (pd951f669.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.246.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B72ED3F9B0; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 00:29:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 00:29:27 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#46780: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org Message-ID: <20210228002927.0d14cc92@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20210227145847.3c0f5baf@alma-ubu> References: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> <20210227145847.3c0f5baf@alma-ubu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/pAAiqhb9mHMYGNWOV6OZLbc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46780-done Cc: 46780-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/pAAiqhb9mHMYGNWOV6OZLbc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:58:47 +0100 Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:08:42 +0100 > zimoun wrote: >=20 > > What about adding a phase just before the test? For example in this > > build.xml file fix the max memory to 20G if it is greater. =20 Thanks for the idea. I first tested it with maxmemory=3D"1M" and this fails with a OOM-error on my pc, thus I knew this setting is really honored. Now I set it to 2G and sent a patch under commit: 23dcf4339d1dc102b2c509a151734f4caff793bd And it works now on Berlin: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/361691/details Closing. Bj=C3=B6rn PS: While looking at the Cuirass logs, I remembered the other memory-problem we head, it was with java-kafka-clients: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/361612/details https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D40554 At first sight, we could try the same trick here. I will investigate this in the next week, if not someone else is quicker. --Sig_/pAAiqhb9mHMYGNWOV6OZLbc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EAREKAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCYDrV1wAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /QSqAJ9Ta8QzkA2OwTMlCfXGs1qS4cmiRgCguF9PNtECPMeHt1I2plo1l7XXaAs= =WW4A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pAAiqhb9mHMYGNWOV6OZLbc-- ------------=_1614468602-9729-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 20:52:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39460 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNd1-0006TD-Q6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:56 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNcy-0006T4-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNcy-0003bn-GR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:52 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:59116 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFNcw-0008FT-Dw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:52:52 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu.fritz.box (pd951f1a8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.241.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40A453FCE9 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:52:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:52:45 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Subject: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org Message-ID: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/BFdUPU__eb1SS357oyX=Qeu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.151.27.109; envelope-from=bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de; helo=bjoernhoefling.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --Sig_/BFdUPU__eb1SS357oyX=Qeu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable java-snappy fails as a dependency of several Java evaluations, for example: http://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/120281?status=3Dfailed http://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/359649/log/raw These failures exist only on ci.guix.gnu.org, but locally it build perfectly, even with --rounds=3D100! Why? Because our buildmachine has too much memory :-) [And I can remember, we once had that for another package, I just can't remember again which one]. What should we do about it? Just disable the test, or something more complicated? Analysis: To analyze, I let it once fail with the -K switch to have the directory /tmp/guix-build-java-snappy-1.1.7.drv-0/ available. Enter the environment with $ guix environment java-snappy $ cd /tmp/guix-build-java-snappy-1.1.7.drv-0/ $ source ./environment-variables $ cd source $ ant check --> everything is fine. =20 Then increase the memory used by junit: Edit the build.xml file, add a huge "maxmemory" property like this : Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 46780-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46780-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46780.161459617930897 (code D ref 46780); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 46780-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 10:56:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48241 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGgDr-00082H-AB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 05:56:19 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:42589) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGgDp-000821-21 for 46780-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 05:56:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id j2so2769973wrx.9 for <46780-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 02:56:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dP6oSkuD93IiN6e0YXNJblbYBpMCPidohpowbhlmf78=; b=Ij3kQc4lr7uHPFRFsM+XOAuV8oxKuNXuK4PCOWvJvhe7x9b04sYoVEzmfZTydpR/LZ Sv+K3kzgafq3UTG4SdMJoG4AzZCW/BY+UJKyUBdizpft5Fv0Ec9dYxhQ6J//7KZvrB1c w/mMhdE9jL8TXlSgiKE0gT3C52GaqwtIhnAHj5D/RNC7JI0oeJ1EIYiAiwRVAWWSFfwM 1pCyIWV5Bp7uq/fD8cjrnrwnV9dex7ZMNGm5dmPFQytzoeAkWyHZt8Y0hCc5qjNpg7XI 0SkfvODkKa9zUFkUNsrvvnqQtX+gHOYCJXDERpxOWwhrPAUXEHo50TZ0Zqi9b0ZMO1YW AQAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dP6oSkuD93IiN6e0YXNJblbYBpMCPidohpowbhlmf78=; b=VwJ7w5n8jmavZ/Xqn0WX7S385kmZR6cOyyaY7FgVibN8jqPZCWTWt5tFA6APjMdTao AOQ5KLmWrjB5EprAfrLkpPqn8s4BXcEcgnUvxcVOnExyfhA3LxoZeYJnw8/HicDdYR2X 8fmyAl4TKlvp0s8J7K/35nyAjMss3qHrf0qB3aLaDS4IRySXbu8l1Pd6zyC5DDOJwIuc uP2cKFOJQF+m6BuwaZHy+11Naomspzug+Sx52nYxlD9HAdLNRzAIlBnTD/OI8m50QbF6 F2ZfQGAMiUyKme8ZeRS9BYh8UHc7AuEYgmRqgBGBDc/I8cvjrEPxw4tqfVxS5GdWwX3R 8ogg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eYPAhoPTulB5fvJFLFHuxzKR/z1okdGt5O5tIzIYu3otHrbPe cjZXgo4+aQan9/uZuWmzuTG8x8B0ckY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzf8QSrBta+A/lKLwt4Fz7XfE8LmJiE1W7KQ9SNr9XjaGNxqBCcMQXq2UkP/ljP1r2EoOg8Fw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:100f:: with SMTP id a15mr16173478wrx.212.1614596171134; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 02:56:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m17sm3961295wrx.92.2021.03.01.02.56.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 02:56:10 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <20210228002927.0d14cc92@alma-ubu> References: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> <20210227145847.3c0f5baf@alma-ubu> <20210228002927.0d14cc92@alma-ubu> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 11:50:34 +0100 Message-ID: <86eegz9mh1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 00:29, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > I first tested it with maxmemory=3D"1M" and this fails with a OOM-error > on my pc, thus I knew this setting is really honored. > > Now I set it to 2G and sent a patch under commit: > > 23dcf4339d1dc102b2c509a151734f4caff793bd > > And it works now on Berlin: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/361691/details > > Closing. Cool if it worked! :-) Cheers, simon