GNU bug report logs - #46739
Python mode vs. whitespace

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#46739: closed (Python mode vs. whitespace)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:20:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:19:31 +0800
with message-id <87h7lzfrcs.5.fsf <at> jidanni.org>
and subject line Re: bug#46739: Python mode vs. whitespace
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46739,
regarding Python mode vs. whitespace
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
46739: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46739
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Python mode vs. whitespace
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:03:07 +0800

$ emacs file.py

    p=1
    p= 2
    p = 3
    p =4

I sure wish TAB (indent-for-tab-command) would make up its mind about
which one of these is best, and not throw up its hands and not deal with
it at all. "Even if they are all valid."
Of course 1 and 3 are better, and 3 is best.
But there could be a variable to set, for users who like 1.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: 46739-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#46739: Python mode vs. whitespace
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:19:31 +0800

>>>>> "SK" == Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
SK> So you are saying that `indent-for-tab-command' should also format
SK> assignments?  I think that would be a bit unexpected, as the command is
SK> specifically about indentation, and not intended for general code
SK> formatting.
OK. Sorry. Closing.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.