Subject: bug#46739: closed (Re: bug#46739: Python mode vs. whitespace)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:20:02 +0000

Your bug report

#46739: Python mode vs. whitespace

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
46739: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46739
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#46739: Python mode vs. whitespace
From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <[email-masked]>
To: Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:19:31 +0800
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

>>>>> "SK" == Stefan Kangas <[email-masked]> writes:
SK> So you are saying that `indent-for-tab-command' should also format
SK> assignments?  I think that would be a bit unexpected, as the command is
SK> specifically about indentation, and not intended for general code
SK> formatting.
OK. Sorry. Closing.

Subject: Python mode vs. whitespace
From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:03:07 +0800
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

$ emacs file.py

    p=1
    p= 2
    p = 3
    p =4

I sure wish TAB (indent-for-tab-command) would make up its mind about
which one of these is best, and not throw up its hands and not deal with
it at all. "Even if they are all valid."
Of course 1 and 3 are better, and 3 is best.
But there could be a variable to set, for users who like 1.