From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 20 16:32:45 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 21:32:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDZrp-0004ky-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:32:45 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDZrm-0004kq-P3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:32:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDZrm-0003kF-Fq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:32:42 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]:33596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDZrl-0005Mx-11 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:32:42 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id e2so7644993ilu.0 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:32:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rmfv9jH/8RS6tWRIcCHpOjvvQxte1v/ZQK/GuxW8AnQ=; b=bKjAOYLXF2h3m/IPnZrSHgZeTXlULalgZS/sNSFaVTsIOYKCAzoCmCEYBsczShx38B LdieMAUXRzjjmsLkviqYeN6HqvI/JbiclBVDXya07EeU3Fd3ST9LJlr7nR1ebs4BFwj8 Wsr4faGuht+WgF3LO9GPSeQb476YmSw0m8fTooaDIjnat0SJok96gTh6Lw9qUq61k+p0 LBytvfEFIAaQRlX8xzPUQarE5WHjC98l5m6bY8PSwYsxK9rZHGGqYP27SfoSRzBfW09E /L5EL0inKPs96CIZkgscClnVCnP+x12EzxrhoOo9wDL+iP7KgFoaLNmCpoCbdbYkDnpF YIvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rmfv9jH/8RS6tWRIcCHpOjvvQxte1v/ZQK/GuxW8AnQ=; b=h2RulNBSs9aAtvgqezftZi+K8zDAXG9H+cTAz0J0aTrLFLgONmrEHLUJREyTe/tXKH QQfjDdzwAGd2PuqTIfBh3rhP11OGmKDTw36l3UPdH7n8Iw4yFAc6TvmnKrI5BsoxsYyh D/l+6ElqvgC36UomsbhBiHc+jjYT+qsMPIRT20qMXLvmpBLI8RslUaiJBMxXfEus1Ush jB/t/sy/4N+67eMuhuMLwH+vMRQa69wENjqhho4/fi+47NoAXYPA4a0kZ2uzgMrGn4J+ T74NXD3kKzxeCgbkMi57+X+MxhnEEtcaC8WBaLqN+lF85gHayuQS88hXNTaR7rSpsREq bODA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NY5OeJbhDEzJycVB2l8D+O48gPhanoejC7uhVr8DXCxAB54wB faTtVlab5ZJVzvDB+AOYKjmfXlSVCjIc2oiR90hZ4DpP3Bc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqXNY7wht5r254XXJK7qdVcwuYaa0j038ofSFDeT3j7umjLYSUmXfez9PaGUJauOHEo7nN7Q+IUSeOnYVfUck= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:cb1:: with SMTP id 17mr6039342ilg.271.1613856758671; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:32:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andy Tai Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:32:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: package addition/update patch submissions To: bug-guix@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b; envelope-from=lichengtai@gmail.com; helo=mail-il1-x12b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, I wonder if package patch submitter can in any way help to speed up the review of such patches? I sent some patches some of which received quick feedback but some seem to be waiting for review for quiet some time. I understand all these are done by volunteers. I hope package patches can be applied more quickly to make Guix more "up to date" as a GNU/Linux distribution. Just curious if there is any guideline to make package addition or update patches easier for the reviewers to process, thus speeding up submission application. Thanks --=20 Andy Tai, atai@atai.org Year 2021 =E6=B0=91=E5=9C=8B110=E5=B9=B4 =E8=87=AA=E5=8B=95=E7=9A=84=E7=B2=BE=E7=A5=9E=E5=8A=9B=E6=98=AF=E4=BF=A1=E4= =BB=B0=E8=88=87=E8=A6=BA=E6=82=9F =E8=87=AA=E5=8B=95=E7=9A=84=E8=A1=8C=E7=82=BA=E5=8A=9B=E6=98=AF=E5=8B=9E=E5= =8B=95=E8=88=87=E6=8A=80=E8=83=BD From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 20 18:20:58 2021 Received: (at 46666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 23:20:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYY-0000xB-LK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:58 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:49019) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYW-0000wx-KU for 46666@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:57 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EAD864; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=J2hkBlDRLtcwnKiB30Opr8gx cAD0LiE0MIXwRUv2VWw=; b=yZfcW3x1XGtfdzlI6iaAMVxRluujNSt0zacAVA+9 778wDSASr2rhuK7+0Y0NBqc3OfZycriUSZ9hkrMiqXgvmH1ffx656FE4o6HgP7k0 gxFTPPBOs9NzjjkO0tV/4fdehbkc6J3NBsBuVXuT4hT1gWKrEnFjDaZeoUcWezf8 XaY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=J2hkBl DRLtcwnKiB30Opr8gxcAD0LiE0MIXwRUv2VWw=; b=oo5xsp9hHm8f2a8Ll31gb0 QUwkfKdla6BwtZ7kDjnBQMWexArAAujLN9r5jMIangQbgZhT80aGm5wjYoT91xMp k5HwTIuc8SmoLuVrti1aSi9I6B+9pXTLkJAKmbrpKS70SVGrwJcPf7Tqz7JV0Fzr bSz3jVLLlPfuSiJfTHQ17FlqN/ad0ZZh3PrpogWCbkFKVq+AxXbJRL6c7eEZq5OE OefdvI/aOkG+4GD82Zy4ZTLN6Id+yOwXvFKx2m5kTyOS/5+AHxyZt5JQgHF2C/Wm GXkc+sDBdWA8v4fNPC6dG/+OxCzSqxkq+OZoo5D7ys/Gcmc+8mIdStP62V2QCIlw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrjeelgddtjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghr ihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufe eivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffevgfenucfkphepieelrdduvddtrdelvddrvddtkeen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ool-45785cd0.dyn.optonline.net [69.120.92.208]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 10987240057; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:47 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Andy Tai Subject: Re: bug#46666: package addition/update patch submissions Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46666 Cc: 46666@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 01:32:02PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, I wonder if package patch submitter can in any way help to speed > up the review of such patches? I sent some patches some of which > received quick feedback but some seem to be waiting for review for > quiet some time. I understand all these are done by volunteers. I > hope package patches can be applied more quickly to make Guix more "up > to date" as a GNU/Linux distribution. Just curious if there is any > guideline to make package addition or update patches easier for the > reviewers to process, thus speeding up submission application. Thanks Hi Andy, I'll take a look at your open patches now and either push them or send feedback. I'll also try to give feedback about easing the review process. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 23 15:06:55 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2021 20:06:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEdxP-000567-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:06:55 -0500 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:36609) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEdxN-00055s-UV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:06:54 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3680F368; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:06:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:06:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=LUD5aYwAgGUroNH/dZ/UclFKNl1LdIcTSJqavYZ9uQo=; b=SxslUxr8Z/yR lH9gXTsF1SdniTwTst+PeZOjRVkLI8wETlKsQogUPas3V9/9iu4C8b4SppBJCSf2 JfNpe9lAO3NY6fipZmhp2mof3B++TwCW2i23qSqmNxn4g10SRYTE95wtJbdO+Na2 IbUsz3D5Bqc6erFS+tnfnBVbr3TrsWU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=LUD5aYwAgGUroNH/dZ/UclFKNl1LdIcTSJqavYZ9u Qo=; b=QoHsyWaUaH1Zqgao/mahDoxSdDUhyXh2lr9WoftjZrLg9OGZ2bBSp4ArA 40GoqngskA+cgEGlmCkZLeL1ivWgyu1e3hqczAJ5AeSjpOSrA2FFHf5n3t0RhfIC 3MJmg5lPWkB6DRDL7Y0BFBCvhLahsAXeeB9anCMDHTBsX6QoZeC9mBIljt2ycVLm 9Qhdh6oqrLKjQqqzE6k6STZ3QTHZOXkNXuz/svTBq9/I4QsvAi65nGhgD+rXqQlZ aeFxT06EhT6QIHizaUF+mWDbT+7y8ZsgBT+lYvTIm33O3r2OMy0fBBEy7+7gGSm7 0EIy3xypXBDjHFPGlz1AT83cE9reQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeehgddufedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfgmhhpthihuchsuhgsjhgvtghtucdluddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvkfggtggusehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhl rghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpe fhjeeigfefvedvfeetheegledtkeevuddtgedtudeiteehteegvdefffduffefffenucfk phepuddttddruddurdduieelrdduudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9E8931080063 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:06:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:06:46 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 46666 Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [64.147.123.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [64.147.123.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject 1.4 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 46666 Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [64.147.123.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [64.147.123.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.4 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message close 46666 From unknown Fri Sep 12 05:10:25 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator