From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 20 09:02:07 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 14:02:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDSpi-00020A-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:02:07 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDSFx-00016s-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:25:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDSFw-0006gi-UJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:25:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]:37535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDSFv-0008FB-AI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:25:08 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id m1so10255613wml.2 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 05:25:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=rN3P0sr8g86bZx7EUv0lN9dYXifKDdeD2PDerlZAshs=; b=RWYfmNZyYOUrsjEVYczsl/BHcYz//b4OeiwhOFfVucRSolaygEr8cbwuZC73nixonm /hfd2ChxT+ZRBugRMf2xDn2pHFRQY5Tky1LKqJNnJPgVCtEzWs9goXnlRWu6IZPG0/os oueKcuLMytTP+JIBtqI1dO8SMKVG5zZ6OdJOWIR/6tYR1cRsIwv8l9zRlknaceICNmHZ 5yFv7xsLcV7lXOdQb08QmeJxgalBBECbOt6p9z3vKn8qGmHkGJ5BCP7tiR5N7ZDQBSGe 30dXEPM0YD2n6PdCsJoCNNumUX4df3ytg8ICyPzDvSgn2s8Zx1XxAglKVGO67fV9YI43 vvbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=rN3P0sr8g86bZx7EUv0lN9dYXifKDdeD2PDerlZAshs=; b=oMg29es7GcWlLpUw/hLoEpgnBbQ+VnzQPftzg9eC369B97BW3BhagsQpleoAvtmWpm 2mWVmQa0F611uxefbLGwO5R7s0Z0Jf3fBvpwPTOM2wT0idh4fyM3Sf3rB3Ufwqrazod5 gVEhgHcZabOzVVFaRTXMQQ36Sn9VKjU5YriqQkgfMN2NNYtfWeHzBZaS6NwcvMkZaB1G hjSX9qJ7OMKiWXQ4tM/V2+fWtkNDIiNHLx5XWX6vCMca7/DOj09+WNYF2VsuzTkzUIUb rI/ywQ9akgI5rwvyhF+o/wruns1xX2mvgWIf+76eC8prOUcUjUJdCVcw0XH/ZX5VPRz3 Brdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BarYMSwxrBg+rgz71SAqKd0Mtb/80b+qcyg5n+QvWP68S1NnD OsLj/TvEL/3/vMuWdpdIhMI7egBH284= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOmV9ei6vP9E6pf3VMN7TaXJaGyUO19kgmyBDyqLSpPZtbsABgQYsp+RUlgBQyRGtK/9K1Jg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c1c4:: with SMTP id a4mr2059648wmj.123.1613827504395; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 05:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:cb08:9070:900:e4e0:562:f112:dbf6? (2a01cb0890700900e4e00562f112dbf6.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb08:9070:900:e4e0:562:f112:dbf6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m17sm15774536wmq.5.2021.02.20.05.25.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 05:25:04 -0800 (PST) To: bug-guix@gnu.org From: Epholys Subject: [Website] 404 redirection on a link in a blog article Message-ID: Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:25:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: fr Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::336; envelope-from=epholys@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x336.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:02:02 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, I want to report a missing resource on the web page: https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/ The link [full graph] redirects to a 404: https://guix.gnu.org/en/static/blog/img/gcc-core-mesboot0-graph.svg --- Thomas Munoz From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 20 16:22:29 2021 Received: (at 46663-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 21:22:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53003 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDZht-0004Ur-5t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:22:29 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:38114 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDZhq-0004Uh-7o for 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:22:27 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A58323605E1; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:22:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1613856144; bh=uTNir3dE2gJdbsHOa85eQK9yWkPXmmM7ozoc/XKUV1U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=HZyEksLTlQJul5EY9bL93m22kWHan1Z+qD9C9KBOod6wo2YU2OabA6L25YJYyxC/8 PAiD34pSXTG2jrXDJo5/I1BmVIWdyG2n516oYve0FTDDgGrp36PXs4ofKWNOcgXb5L IWSV/jyNzsO2L86IT3yzs+10txFLxuO7UzVBadoI= Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:22:16 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Epholys Subject: Re: bug#46663: [Website] 404 redirection on a link in a blog article Message-ID: <20210220212156.ciqlbjwbvau2urlq@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46663-done Cc: 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:03PM +0100, Epholys wrote: > Hello, > > I want to report a missing resource on the web page: > https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/ > > > The link [full graph] redirects to a 404: > https://guix.gnu.org/en/static/blog/img/gcc-core-mesboot0-graph.svg Thank you for reporting! Fixed as 6361ba930f94d7c0f7f0265ff63c97d300c57067. The website will rebuild soon to include the fix. Closing. Regards, Florian From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 22 14:48:59 2021 Received: (at 46663-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2021 19:48:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEHCV-0006n8-7g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:48:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:43902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEHCT-0006n0-6U for 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:48:57 -0500 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dkt6J1y7GzFwTT; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:48:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1614023336; bh=SEoiXfikuYG5X1SmA0kP3AZvKzwRMEGTB/2NRVLJNiY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sRpxPEdgIQMo8zn90tmAGCBICqNp69IarsTsbDFgzLqFQo0F+77+ybqhyPc9nyg0/ 4GSmHObQwM0lBO969iwYkZ5SG7CrCmsiDBvGmKtHBTWoPedjzoNMVuH+0KlC0k/v8y mpAJGVw9OAAsEegu0qlh1k3G81WK/+FnqD7A1zqA= X-Riseup-User-ID: 5067CB3187303FDC19FAC17577FEA4BD46103736CF53E870EC90D441B23F0F77 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dkt6F1CzFz5wGL; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:48:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:20:43 +0100 From: raingloom To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: Re: bug#46663: [Website] 404 redirection on a link in a blog article Message-ID: <20210222202043.5fc80471@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <20210220212156.ciqlbjwbvau2urlq@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20210220212156.ciqlbjwbvau2urlq@pelzflorian.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46663-done Cc: Epholys , 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 22:22:16 +0100 "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:25:03PM +0100, Epholys wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I want to report a missing resource on the web page: > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/ > > > > > > The link [full graph] redirects to a 404: > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/static/blog/img/gcc-core-mesboot0-graph.svg > > > > Thank you for reporting! Fixed as > 6361ba930f94d7c0f7f0265ff63c97d300c57067. > > The website will rebuild soon to include the fix. > > Closing. > > Regards, > Florian > > > Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be worth setting up if not. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 12:58:51 2021 Received: (at 46663-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 17:58:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35858 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEyR1-0000Yz-JK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:58:51 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:42994 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEyR0-0000Yr-EL for 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:58:51 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2D7C3605E1; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:58:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1614189529; bh=7zlT440eMVWNpGBe7KbDmqUlViC5YbfXDhT1Qva8jNA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=o157ebZHC5UI2pJKaSv2r0xZVPFmsalJ+NSu/qAF/+TX6/Qf/jsRviqqKH1PuyxmA EM/Zm42yIwaLeG8F9usQGAduitZqnRdoe/o7SotamLrjY1AqZgFoks9RWpCze7ygOp 3O9RMFuXFf13HkB7gclR/T9aEkB5C1y+fwX4U5Vs= Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:58:38 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: raingloom Subject: Re: bug#46663: [Website] 404 redirection on a link in a blog article Message-ID: <20210224175803.s3tu4qkvwg4ekqdk@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20210220212156.ciqlbjwbvau2urlq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20210222202043.5fc80471@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210222202043.5fc80471@riseup.net> X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +0100, raingloom wrote: > Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be > worth setting up if not. You made me check for other broken links using wget on a local build of the website. Indeed there were some more broken links. Thanks! Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46663-done Cc: Epholys , 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +0100, raingloom wrote: > Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be > worth setting up if not. You made me check for other broken links using wget on a local build of the website. Indeed there were some more broken links. Thanks! However I am too lazy to try to set up automatic and continuous broken link checking. I think me and others should just be more careful when moving things around. Regards, Florian From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 21:20:53 2021 Received: (at 46663-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2021 02:20:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36332 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF6Gr-0006Ag-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:20:53 -0500 Received: from imta-36.everyone.net ([216.200.145.36]:48422 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF6Gq-0006AX-5P for 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:20:52 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (omta002.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11P2IsUu029413; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:20:50 -0800 X-Eon-Originating-Account: Lr5pmm8Wnhm0RAXa_tFYfHy7hO3I2c1aNd-e5N0EMqs X-Eon-Dm: m0116293.ppops.net Received: by m0116293.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92baa) id m0116293.6000aa54.39cf69; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:20:49 -0800 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJgNwmBAUP49gIAAAAE,9232fb4e51e7139e05a6733f94d79e7e X-Eip: SE-3aAVEjeuLRQ7tuKtKXikK0V2t5Ht-ONzoWYqWxpA Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:20:40 +0100 From: Bengt Richter To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: Re: bug#46663: [Website] 404 redirection on a link in a blog article Message-ID: <20210225022040.GA4927@LionPure> References: <20210220212156.ciqlbjwbvau2urlq@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20210222202043.5fc80471@riseup.net> <20210224175803.s3tu4qkvwg4ekqdk@pelzflorian.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210224175803.s3tu4qkvwg4ekqdk@pelzflorian.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-24_13:2021-02-24, 2021-02-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1034 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102250017 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46663-done Cc: Epholys , raingloom , 46663-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Hi, On +2021-02-24 18:58:38 +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:20:43PM +0100, raingloom wrote: > > Is there something that scans the website for broken links? Might be > > worth setting up if not. > > You made me check for other broken links using wget on a local build > of the website. Indeed there were some more broken links. Thanks! > > However I am too lazy to try to set up automatic and continuous broken > link checking. I think me and others should just be more careful when > moving things around. > > Regards, > Florian > > > I couldn't believe this is not a stardard tool for web site maintainers, so i put web broken link lister to duckduckgo and got lots of hits. Well, tl;dr -- having other concerns at the moment, but at least I felt my hunch validated. I bet it gets re-invented a lot :-p -- Regards, Bengt Richter From unknown Thu Sep 11 21:35:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator