From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 19 15:04:54 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2021 20:04:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50447 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDC1G-00053x-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:04:54 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDC1D-00053i-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:04:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDC1D-0003UJ-F1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:04:51 -0500 Received: from dd3624.kasserver.com ([85.13.130.11]:54714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDC1A-0004H4-5T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:04:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (37-186-9-252.ip.as39912.net [37.186.9.252]) by dd3624.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 05BDB5D405B0; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:04:42 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?q?Stefan=20Reich=C3=B6r?= To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: ghc-protolude: Update to 0.3.0. Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:04:25 +0100 Message-Id: <20210219200427.105200-1-stefan@xsteve.at> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.13.130.11; envelope-from=stefan@xsteve.at; helo=dd3624.kasserver.com X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Stefan=20Reich=C3=B6r?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) * gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm (ghc-protolude): Update to 0.3.0. --- gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm index d6c50ade71..f1709e342a 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ ;;; Copyright © 2020 Alexandru-Sergiu Marton ;;; Copyright © 2020 Carlo Holl ;;; Copyright © 2020 Christopher Lemmer Webber +;;; Copyright © 2021 Stefan Reichör ;;; ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. ;;; @@ -10535,7 +10536,7 @@ the ideal templating system.") (define-public ghc-protolude (package (name "ghc-protolude") - (version "0.2.3") + (version "0.3.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) @@ -10545,7 +10546,7 @@ the ideal templating system.") ".tar.gz")) (sha256 (base32 - "0zzkyxz0vmcbncpid7gp72fpjj0fla3gqhlfkij5c5lg12skjgfj")))) + "1b6wprbwfdjyvds2bm6na0fbqgzdkj5ikkk33whbkyh3krd3i0s0")))) (build-system haskell-build-system) (inputs `(("ghc-async" ,ghc-async) -- 2.25.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 09:11:25 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 14:11:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33935 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEusv-0002rJ-Ml for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:11:25 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:47677) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEust-0002r2-PD for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:11:25 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.214] (37-169-50-198.coucou-networks.fr [37.169.50.198] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11OEBGvc013385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:11:17 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 11OEBGvc013385 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=zaclys.net Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1614175877; bh=DYCGvn5BCFtbcqFBb3W6FXN0DoOwd3XmFRGvse+tTLA=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=TLsthWjUrhsgSUa1qeYDjUgnUrZiR0zMZUCK/6888ElYR7fyvK2tpVbx9T/nFn80z O38S4oMmrj71s3jKL7UD9xUElSdx2g0DTP/9HYqFPXlH031MtFf+yOmh6YnFPz4BfL Kd2kO47UohQ1+rTSoqsQ2ffn3JWy2ktDIj+pj0Tw= Message-ID: Subject: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:11:10 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uTHfil8M8dmCJuhA7wjb" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 46643 46644 46645 Content analysis details: (3.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 1.4 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: merge 46643 46644 46645 Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.4 BODY_EMPTY No body text in message --=-uTHfil8M8dmCJuhA7wjb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable merge 46643 46644 46645 --=-uTHfil8M8dmCJuhA7wjb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmA2Xn4ACgkQRaix6GvN EKY7WBAAlvf3JOyw7rc9CQSxqn1TIzU+ozQdsXCeocet+p/yVAHeWpzB2g8X1F+z XAKfWvtrsFQBXUwAXPEJwSHKGRH1y2AjIgG78fwOLSAU2luTvD+dD59wJ76GKW3n L6F3NJNFoXYC4/y4Fo8oY3twkoKFAoWMmuB/MggZ9MUKEyKtwF8B+/Nu6VoZk8sg s1jZW5oa/Xhk0MRvgDzaXCMR2wkAbcjJvZ3Qv03YDXGkyIopHaIIuF2kAJHjmXbN sLPngqLxIRFaq+3C1l62cmPHBzBR4W4cllLs+PCC9r0BPxAaxlX8tcwG83olScOn HpqVCileUbXSoFHZbzv3GwAYEvdv6mlRnvt2+ylMCQ9+ftIckAvERT8HmRZZoU2R lcLQm4FcFiFzlldml05vbboy1jv1QbtV/Vvsjec1g7DJK5fKKE5O28rQ8/XgWihf AzNs+4TUtSVDdePW/NNs8hE/xzDC2Xa39PoAhESHuMxy4ffmVTZizOSsmdpt43Jc tiKVDZgEowTY1ui8i7NQNKQ+ov2OiIs+f4VR72+Oe2A4oKnT+5Fpl6KD9Jc83uv9 /LpjOPltmwvaji/HqPbPpXfnWHSY8wYT2MkrWlmMzU4L0N8iFckZc86tfWIMhWRr ogFJ5DdIahKi7UeXubfMOhygp1IjIoYFaVBT0uw19ZcGcZfspSk= =9rLf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uTHfil8M8dmCJuhA7wjb-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 09:27:58 2021 Received: (at 46643-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 14:27:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEv8w-0005Nz-Av for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:27:58 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:44999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEv8t-0005NX-3E for 46643-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:27:56 -0500 Received: from guix-xps.local (37-169-50-198.coucou-networks.fr [37.169.50.198] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11OERlOd016099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <46643-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:27:48 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 11OERlOd016099 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=zaclys.net Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1614176868; bh=nlV+Ijw3IhbpLsUR/QNbeO94fPpem0PIeXF9JTVCTpM=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=c1dMphCPdWVMvirLp+ksJxrBvfpI8/CxbW3ujEKZYrAMt1rJI6MDfJ1oz3BV83j/6 PmVsG14y21fa6kfnsm3l6YdgEWDYx6ghGVAT5pfpnTu12OQDup70jLNOve2LeGZf6Q 6DZNV9Nes+KCkT2mkNdJoyNlqSkluLk2UFRoQTKc= Message-ID: <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> Subject: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: 46643-done@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:27:43 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WpNiIgXYh7P9XI3BFMOO" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Pushed all patches in a1386815503036773a1092554f36d45dd9361efe. It seems the licenses for ghc-wordexp and greenclip is BSD-3-Clause from and < https://hackage.haskell.org/package/greenclip>. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46643-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) --=-WpNiIgXYh7P9XI3BFMOO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pushed all patches in a1386815503036773a1092554f36d45dd9361efe. It seems the licenses for ghc-wordexp and greenclip is BSD-3-Clause from and < https://hackage.haskell.org/package/greenclip>. Also, your upgrade of ghc-protolude broke the purescript build which depends on ghc-protolude<0.2.4 so I created a secondary ghc-protolude- 0.2 package that purescript now depends on. Think about running "$ guix refresh -l " if you modify any package to check for all its dependents and then try to build all the dependents see if they don't break and if they do break please fix them. That's what I did here. I also fixed lint errors on ghc-wordexp. Think about running "$ guix lint " on any package you are adding or altering before submitting. Thank you! --=-WpNiIgXYh7P9XI3BFMOO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmA2Yl8ACgkQRaix6GvN EKY2Zw//fBZ+gvAJiZ2yZc+kcazXUQm1WKhuxVNtBxZCEc1tIzub2aZNTq4NPDiB 03XEAEJlbkqa9UTKwZae67ss+basCHJ4/RZdyQK4NcgAdELusshsDfjZUIuB7D7t pF+qMTywba2L+6T2cOitPFGyP9me42q29ZOc49qxEo5jouT11XPcGPbt93zBBYwq XPCV3l04CJ2cK+48mKDC1lBHUwZjhvlX76HNQtJC+BQh2ckPtWmGTaETkYK8GaAq ffo2dT1JxHZjotloYntFaEkbVOWwfl/ScU00M/asyz7Y72ikPMKR88C4DGBMmcG2 gGa9bQxvBnVVHI8dTs4uSiDAOht2BUTgg3Z+FgMKCZ7ysCqkB84T19wxIjVbla7a 5terskX5wVktGSMXSgm6OrK3Mcs1h9TVP1njXvKwW2+LWYTHDeO8RmG59MV4BtET 781PorDtyqz7IFgS0NeMq3Wjy/O7pH7yXF+oUZ9B0K7dg34bXggJnb07LpcPQP+O ys96pKDV9xfGgSFWDe/Yt3Cbc7CaayBHOxaFAc0ODE1H/K+FR4lX+UwwfB5Qzs5T p7BvL2tga6amMm8sHFSh7VqnvHz+YROiSnf7OIbDDQS8nIi+/8ACWJGsUhArOOSn gSYudVmqfszEaj1Ty7bFX1MFULASgjotinrYju2TVeThiBG8eXA= =QsML -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WpNiIgXYh7P9XI3BFMOO-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 10:41:08 2021 Received: (at 46643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 15:41:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35508 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwHk-0007ZA-MR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:41:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:37570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEwHj-0007Yw-R4; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:41:08 -0500 Received: by mail-qk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id n28so993607qkk.4; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:41:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xkp8o9y3Xc4mUvjyUgrLclGV61chjCQuWwKJSV5qVZg=; b=fxd0CsAX7RUgRFmEUTC1j34hN33Zd/qUJ+AhVjpakUuitcwNp/pKErU15EOVvqfl2x hvdD8ue2/B6Y9rxpgT/T/usjcao7d5kktoNFlY1CGPXVsgpWFVgEHPEemw8R3d8Ta5YL Qla4rmxHVmqABBIRV34HDzCwFU5Atez24W1hoDciBJqQ9uwA644QI7BRx6db3JYAFI5x ApZKY36/rrB9tvjiqUuqMUiAwLO5xukcCHFEGDbE+M3dTQEkDaAcSEDXsHYmAyC33fGE 9v+7LcMXu1QchxbR90O7womgwD7ULQHZoT0oTkmV+nWe7DzIWA4pg8csEmdjicO0QJVN w63Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xkp8o9y3Xc4mUvjyUgrLclGV61chjCQuWwKJSV5qVZg=; b=IRtvu27y1EX+R/SdRp3XuvlkqJYjTZcvEpF05In30Ub08l9xxY66Zsd/zfyoPBcRPL Vpc96lX+FsCqM6gPHp5B2jjc7y5xIpDVtAULKTiIm5XJB4SuCmiEA0VrLm0tiA5UNz43 A/fFaIssehOWPVJ7JGA7sval3tDZqs7K65voU0daafPSrHf8VILz3sHy2AltcAgLtr7j DjIyEzsMcYUMxiJLq67TysjSCyqfdH6/XOn6HeDr++eoEdWAG6uslFgDOcq+zpr88F+y 0jdmPGZoVVWTqMIYZn85UPJ8GUuZX/m5GHZ0OxIMWQEK3VdV7pcmuwcwodltDq8qZPzi 5ASw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qNrmySLfzTBp9mNRzTZkWEQXrJ39j9iQDzzPRqJuB59HwfdRN 4zU6iLdgHfCYjDSnyk6mpLN+T/l1eDOSeL2q6Cw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+da5QsLrtQcwiA0YPnwf19+Nn/qazTn1W2j4faqOvR0PzLjkyjaM9RPVHF0Ra2ZfPvtSnmNGVbJigMwlI+yM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:908:: with SMTP id v8mr32488176qkv.201.1614181262228; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:41:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210219200427.105200-1-stefan@xsteve.at> <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> In-Reply-To: <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:40:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#46643: To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o_Le_Bouter?= , 46643@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@xsteve.at Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46643 Cc: 46643-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi L=C3=A9o, On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 15:28, L=C3=A9o Le Bouter via Guix-patches via wrote: > Also, your upgrade of ghc-protolude broke the purescript build which > depends on ghc-protolude<0.2.4 so I created a secondary ghc-protolude- > 0.2 package that purescript now depends on. Usually, IIUC, the Haskell packages follows one LTS. And there are updated in one go to avoid the Cabal Hell. Well, the current %default-lts-version is 14.27 which has protolude at 0.2.3 [1]. LTS 14.27 supports GHC 8.6 which is the default current ghc in Guix. Using LTS 17.4 seems a bad idea since it supports GHC 8.10 which is not yet included in Guix. Therefore, ghc-protolude should not be updated and ghc-protolude-0.2 should not be added, neither. Or I am missing something. Except corner cases, please keep the Haskell packages consistent with one LTS. The linter should warn about this but it does not; I have not investigated why. If greenclip cannot be built with ghc-protolude@0.2.3, please let the "define-public ghc-protolude" at 0.2.3 and instead define ghc-protolude-0.3. As it is done for ghc-atomic-write or ghc-generic-random or ghc-prettyprinter or ghc-repline. Thanks, simon 1: From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 12:00:28 2021 Received: (at 46643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 17:00:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lExWW-0005tJ-BR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:00:28 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:55877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lExWU-0005lo-0S for 46643@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:00:26 -0500 Received: from guix-xps.local (lsl43-1_migr-78-195-19-20.fbx.proxad.net [78.195.19.20] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11OH0JUg039794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:00:19 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 11OH0JUg039794 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=zaclys.net Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1614186019; bh=i8qZ5AZDJPMqr/0hszj/3n5NJzFPNk5pbwcc1cgJazs=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MmefqIM4uaeyJMmOJVE03Yv2kikz1/arXP8Nmtf2xDHShEewMAxo1QQZvFlIw8G5M 8Ydd3RCbYNys9AEvXm7S+S5dLkctT5m0ZWNgpOLg2Vcu9cQSVHm5OSWBw9M6hrSYUJ NQBlg9KxCxVT3T9x8a3OVFs5BbjTB0n93QEXay0E= Message-ID: <3f58e4c2479d81ac22aa4e591910240bed8fde21.camel@zaclys.net> Subject: Re: bug#46643: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: zimoun , 46643@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@xsteve.at Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:00:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20210219200427.105200-1-stefan@xsteve.at> <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-n6rjbCSYD7N+UrSqIiro" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46643 Cc: 46643@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-n6rjbCSYD7N+UrSqIiro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 16:40 +0100, zimoun wrote: > Hi L=C3=A9o, Hello! :-) > If greenclip cannot be built with ghc-protolude@0.2.3, please let the > "define-public ghc-protolude" at 0.2.3 and instead define > ghc-protolude-0.3. As it is done for ghc-atomic-write or > ghc-generic-random or ghc-prettyprinter or ghc-repline. I see, pushed 6bea71afac702fcab9fb420daa30aec95652e1a0 to hopefully fix these concerns. Will keep in mind! What about ghc-wordexp? Is the version on LTS channel? I couldnt find much about that online (not very at ease with Stackage). Thank you! --=-n6rjbCSYD7N+UrSqIiro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmA2hiIACgkQRaix6GvN EKbOOQ//Zv4h3NHqwR2cqAyuz6jJiJOj53SBc7zvaZIuoL4sYHZsJ9Vnko6oaXiH TSbAHeBbd/baDcLvPBK/7mC4zBt6/fLJmsYzb1hlWg89r92Q421p7Ibl5sv7Yq7J TAgGd+zWICIcImJkdhf0d1n5su/Ic1JQbaspnZ1iNTecvzkVdvmWMe2/BpoQPVsn Q/nf/sWqtyfByBkacqLHfUM1jdWTh9h1ESP/IdqR9HDHHdyXoT+FfMaBFNL7bF+H h3f/SI81Zo9+MSBZja9o9dTBPUn5IK1ZdG77s+ZAjeKpUe0RZO/WltFH0LcHuoFe hJMUIgyqSY7TvUQUxtvrplXhNU7NEDAuAaS+03om3F5YUdzIJUs60OstqCvCixTv 0xg541Ox+RU+3B4OwyQ6FCGhc7hMgqv9S7rAuqy9C5zPRwfXIAt0JRvnvFiLU8KP qzFHRlN2Qotq/s5y8NZEaa6TM7pD9uDQLb0Y2KVcul8KEQVf2KwXX1qCVVaNvFJs +pTX79RH+Q6O5/5j5nm3dLXIIC1TlRg2kL4adWB2bILZeCt6q7ol0GQabITnMDwM 3HwKruIC1B2Mo0+ndApiU5apJUQdMpz1Q5uBCa/jltYPWhjVVmRPHWv1UJDVCTLz whgofTsU0lCUSGUKSeW6RT5AuzCuByH6IzHj1CP3MVkKoHuEEqs= =dVio -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-n6rjbCSYD7N+UrSqIiro-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 14:14:55 2021 Received: (at 46643) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 19:14:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35966 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEzcd-0004VS-GN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:14:55 -0500 Received: from dd3624.kasserver.com ([85.13.130.11]:39372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEzcb-0004VJ-BN for 46643@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:14:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (37-186-9-252.ip.as39912.net [37.186.9.252]) by dd3624.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 826265D4021E; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:14:51 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan =?utf-8?Q?Reich=C3=B6r?= To: =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter Subject: Re: bug#46643: In-Reply-To: <3f58e4c2479d81ac22aa4e591910240bed8fde21.camel@zaclys.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter"'s message of "Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:00:18 +0100") References: <20210219200427.105200-1-stefan@xsteve.at> <1fb2ba44f701f4bf10876deb73a3d45cb4b53e9b.camel@zaclys.net> <3f58e4c2479d81ac22aa4e591910240bed8fde21.camel@zaclys.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:14:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeh5b7mc.fsf@xsteve.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46643 Cc: 46643@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi L=C3=A9o, Hi Simon, thank you both for your kind help. I already enjoy using Guix and I hope to master it more and more in the fut= ure! Stefan. > On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 16:40 +0100, zimoun wrote: >> Hi L=C3=A9o, > > Hello! :-) > >> If greenclip cannot be built with ghc-protolude@0.2.3, please let the >> "define-public ghc-protolude" at 0.2.3 and instead define >> ghc-protolude-0.3. As it is done for ghc-atomic-write or >> ghc-generic-random or ghc-prettyprinter or ghc-repline. > > I see, pushed 6bea71afac702fcab9fb420daa30aec95652e1a0 to hopefully fix > these concerns. Will keep in mind! > > What about ghc-wordexp? Is the version on LTS channel? I couldnt find > much about that online (not very at ease with Stackage). > > Thank you! From unknown Thu Sep 11 05:48:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator