GNU bug report logs -
#46537
‘uname -s’ from Gash-Utils-Boot returns nothing
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 17:25:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Timothy Sample <samplet <at> ngyro.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #14 received at 46537 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:16:29PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (+Cc: gash-devel.)
>
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:24:46PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Gash-Utils ‘uname’ seems to be confused:
> >>
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >> $ $(guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) gash-utils-boot)')/bin/uname -a
> >> Linux ribbon 5.10.10-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >> $ $(guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) gash-utils-boot)')/bin/uname -s
> >>
> >> $ guix describe
> >> Generacio 175 Feb 04 2021 22:52:40 (nuna)
> >> guix 5ae09d7
> >> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
> >> branch: master
> >> commit: 5ae09d7979a0696d862b9555314eab199f7ce576
> >> $ uname -s
> >> Linux
> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> I forgot to mention the ‘uname -s’ problem is hidden by the fact that we
> always pass ‘--build’ to ‘configure’. When we don’t do that,
> ‘config.guess’ runs and fails.
>
> > From eedd0ee769393eea3fcb9b7131d469ea15d9f179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
> > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:50:20 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] uname: Fix uname -s.
> >
> > * gash/commands/uname.scm (uname): Remove duplicate kernel-name? match.
> > ---
> > gash/commands/uname.scm | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gash/commands/uname.scm b/gash/commands/uname.scm
> > index 2a89c6a..fa15c69 100644
> > --- a/gash/commands/uname.scm
> > +++ b/gash/commands/uname.scm
> > @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
> > (processor? (option-ref options 'processor #f))
> > (hardware-platform? (option-ref options 'hardware-platform #f))
> > (operating-system? (option-ref options 'operating-system #f))
> > - (kernel-name? (not (or all? kernel-name? node-name? kernel-release? kernel-version? machine? processor? hardware-platform? operating-system?)))
>
> I wonder if this should be kept but changed to:
>
> (kernel-name? (or kernel-name? (not (or …))))
With it changed to this:
(ins)efraim <at> 3900XT ~/workspace/gash-utils$ /gnu/store/9mb28yyzfh6pr4yk5nyy42vrfbj8caxp-gash-utils-boot-0.1.0.107-eedd-dirty/bin/uname -s
Linux
>
> but I’m not entirely sure about the logic.
>
> Gash folks, WDYT?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 93 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.