GNU bug report logs - #46502
28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: pipcet <at> gmail.com
Cc: mwd <at> md5i.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 46502 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, akrl <at> sdf.org
Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:48:33 +0200

> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:21:38 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: mwd <at> md5i.com, 46502 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, akrl <at> sdf.org
> 
> > From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:15:48 +0000
> > Cc: akrl <at> sdf.org, mwd <at> md5i.com, 46502 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > 
> > > Can you send the diffs as an attachment?
> > 
> > I'm sending the complete diff, even though it's a bit large... The
> > path differences are obviously okay, and I'm not going to complain
> > about differences in gensym numbering, but byte-optimize-lapcode, to
> > pick an example at random, differs in the bytecode.
> 
> Thanks.  Stefan, any idea why we see differences here?

Btw, if you let macroexp.el byte-compile uninterrupted, then rename
the .elc file and re-compile the .el file, do you get identical .elc
files?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.