GNU bug report logs - #465
pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn <at> gnuvola.org>
Subject: bug#470 closed by Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> (Re: 
 pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the emacs package:

#465: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem

It has been closed by Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> by
replying to this email.


-- 
465: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=465
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: 465-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:08:30 -0400

I've checked in a fix for this (verified by Ken Manheimer via private
email).  This fix is in pgg-gpg.el, which I think was calling
accept-process-output in a slightly incorrect way.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn <at> gnuvola.org>
To: "ken manheimer" <ken.manheimer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: ueno <at> unixuser.org, wilde <at> sha-bang.de
Subject: Re: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:17:51 +0200

() "ken manheimer" <ken.manheimer <at> gmail.com>
() Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:37:11 -0400

   pggprob-patch.txt, with a single-line modification to
   pgg-gpg-process-region to work around the problem.  both
   are attached.  since the workaround is merely a timing
   delay, it's clearly not a fix!

Please find below an UNTESTED patch that addresses the
problem in two ways:
 - use a downward funarg sentinel for complete monitoring
 - reduce unnecessary data motion

Does it give good results?

(Authors added to cc.)

thi

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.