From unknown Fri Jun 20 18:25:16 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#46496 <46496@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#46496 <46496@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: newlib-nano doesn't have libc_nano.a Reply-To: bug#46496 <46496@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 01:25:16 +0000 retitle 46496 newlib-nano doesn't have libc_nano.a=20 reassign 46496 guix submitter 46496 Nala Ginrut severity 46496 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 13 14:11:18 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2021 19:11:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35067 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lB0K6-0002el-5C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:11:18 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lB0K0-0002eZ-VX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:11:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB0K0-0004a7-RD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:11:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lB0K0-0002vC-L2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:11:12 -0500 Received: from [113.89.98.179] (port=60712 helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lB0Jz-0004cv-L0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:11:12 -0500 User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 From: Nala Ginrut To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: newlib-nano doesn't have libc_nano.a Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 03:11:07 +0800 Message-ID: <87pn13srzo.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I can't build ZephyrRTOS with arm-none-eabi-nano-toolchain, because libc_nano.a is required by ZephyrRTOS when I enabled newlib nano config. Then I found there's only libc_nano.a in newlib-nano path, only libc.a. I think libc.a is for newlib, and libc_nano.a is for newlib-nano. Best regards. =2D-=20 GNU Powered it GPL Protected it GOD Blessed it HFG - NalaGinrut Fingerprint F53B 4C56 95B5 E4D5 6093 4324 8469 6772 846A 0058 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE9TtMVpW15NVgk0MkhGlncoRqAFgFAmAoJEsACgkQhGlncoRq AFjG4A/+OK3zATMWJBBa05K7Fv7a5s4pOeRHhplf2E3KibjzRDeCu00jI5p8FlSF pr4NuSH0sflJI0734YZFLbs4D7PwZp9Y9Py0XpAzVTvrSnSD4a2Iv9xZogAqYLUe YlZAL8sZkxhGMAbFi8KaqyphSsYcjEQmoT24Mf7wUJVix7W+08IFpwEzm8kDdWh3 R1SqRQtqr+nf8J5QPVEJYMHpV1FTbs4R19vLoQWnthS72gG0ld+I9pOVQJcgd1L6 u1YrNNBp8LpA05/qukpN1FYrqI1JXPLkbXgctLQCekgYqH6EYhBrsxgbh6wtMLLM VnA7XNY8/kP23qbs5SGg4EBaOxAsjcuLNWLDjzWkRTys4dqagOwtif05cSHch3zS BOJcw+hmaAIiI4gwO/Gnbog7nUneH4M9Fodz8gHKVgrv7djw0e+qRLJTxuE1In8o JDYz8qesepPAX3QI3OzpbIWp7TDvKx8hkqOzpKOD91Gav+yuXiwlp1c85KQANjJF /813rxBaQDszR7y3hVDLn9PtZxDSqToYuNPJd/X2T71kx5DF/9/As+UWVf3KodjK C4sbPNd2U3IoFrb7kLTUMXFCnuf4x52PrWPFQst4odkeVKyH/zvhAUnbqrAvLC4A hFQGn6/ED6VZBjQlsPbR2Dqj9MVNpUeAcgicRUAazt94ltilhfk= =bAat -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 15 14:39:44 2021 Received: (at 46496-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2021 18:39:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lX6u0-0000di-62 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:39:44 -0400 Received: from mail-dm6nam11olkn2080.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.19.80]:2689 helo=NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lX6tx-0000dT-K1 for 46496-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:39:42 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=cWyOM/KskDvI8uWDRV+89oOrIL+v7LKpMMCVTC4TJ8nr4SqkrijKqPE6wW+zZZ+dtF8cDU33o5y5jKLjL72aSJNGwFBQ1SfsN4fPhOyJxgKH0PyHlpApfCxExGUT4Oif0gHPnr2jv/QJADZFg8h17IVebCl/1s1t43hkknmEzHF7J04uyrpY7yToInI+Nm7bJebD6SyC94oJhTKs9VXZoKWbgtnmMpHbwSucSmhdnDtiyIsLc7zKehpX8mw8r5G+TXtKS3/i3GjoRlQu4BtToAtkb1a8l4P4m1tDgSVpk7G/oaWSLFFFpJt0pvYh7JvH7UxGQKU2CcLdt8tZIxwNkg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R1O/GURymXHYoMVUTxVPRzvE5qy1e4/6JaefwU0Vj7Q=; b=MbFqinnBjRcqxCrQTcLsUZSKmcfe1TOz8AHpS2PMGIX9pFCfcmv2Xh45G4JPYq3QIVGw6v0iOWcZT/kCHqyOioVT6Yc4vC4ms4DyYAzszbpTeV/alaXUa+Dn8+fn5tC6DBawGU/TdH0kUhCXRc0TL3UQ8u40jrrXbvYRQKj+wbfzuz37dnHVEYTeaBys2c6z5wzgqCJ/DCicEgy0LmRf7IhKWqBqwQczi10dRw1bVOQmqhof/x65vjX7BGUzu5CQJZcpJg4cVKfS/mNHw+RGVD4o8tS4sy3eJ5FTCt1mwUz1ZVakZP2CKG+egQLGn5YDZa4sGykZlFkr64Zu/lhF2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R1O/GURymXHYoMVUTxVPRzvE5qy1e4/6JaefwU0Vj7Q=; b=LFTqbIxunPznnOEC5Prm80UxMmy0csj1RXRlrOEpZsRnffZAOwsYl88Fy4e3VM94ihoF2CYofKX29nMz8Lrlrz2oC4XBnlFPR9rMy9npe8mrmcGEPSDfiGD5ypkxNLHG4jLL+r46xDLGv8BgHn6galSJAh8VItC9NMMhGfPPR2fq6zHl1+4RDv8jTQ/KPovOdT5nsbVPSgywA8KFW7am/av2j49gdZGRGJg3jAY+EHQdlA6SXB76J1TLO6ORh3vAQF0hWpToQpmD5O7MHzMhOu/ZFIgGApW2orv6xcQenyBnBDwMQFBfCbH7EeL8UNzWLXlU4s5nKLGTvq3xBm7e6Q== Received: from CO1NAM11FT054.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::4b) by CO1NAM11HT223.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::402) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4042.16; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:39:34 +0000 Received: from BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::40) by CO1NAM11FT054.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:3861::70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4042.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:39:34 +0000 X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:6C750597BE4AD7028347A3B4BC98C2F384EC75A15794DE81099FF888CD31BA40; UpperCasedChecksum:6A417B39416558CEC7D676C2045B79BA94F548561B3343E8B78CF2FD4A3A6C00; SizeAsReceived:8423; Count:45 Received: from BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b92f:829e:18e4:7ba9]) by BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b92f:829e:18e4:7ba9%2]) with mapi id 15.20.4065.006; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:39:34 +0000 To: 46496-done@debbugs.gnu.org From: Morgan Smith Subject: Bug closed Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:39:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.9.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TMN: [ioGHX5dADEQMT1zmTJtIVcJPQQ1F/GUo] X-ClientProxiedBy: YQBPR0101CA0004.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00::17) To BYAPR05MB4023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:87::30) X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.45] (170.52.80.149) by YQBPR0101CA0004.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10b6:c00::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:39:33 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-IncomingHeaderCount: 45 X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 7ecab606-dce0-468d-7b1a-08d9003dd08f X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CO1NAM11HT223: X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: bG8/WoGdYXbU/5xhG0aRUI+eTtN4J7DEWh4xtXNhOKmOhH9HpAgaRaYE5r0TyFLWLHxtMPUNuoK9cqfz4UkGY8ff1KQbWgYhCOnxX2G7KcYNiggdpq7N2/2pv2V2fvaufeRnajdZMB8JhC/IvuZTOC1Op8EINfjrcEuVLs/X7rJh+9zkIh+O4NSpde2LS/hZKqHgfjbPFZih1a2sJ/Ku+RQZFTGQc9hNKtBY1TqM+UqPluvs0Aphv0nggDmL9Z+hPRlrJYHtJrnUW9eEN2+UTbvYysYM2mnQmpc/tzLFFIStSMN/TZ81/60St/v20OA9TAYvbP/1ZSvOvMmfniMM4Xxe1l0c/e1vDrzv9lS8RbiIeA5Dw29ZvSxe8p/9VZ+wmMD3CL5Bt3YZZbbj6nyaog== X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: VQs3Mi8s3v9poZuuouFeRkUpLMUnS8StdxHBQX7JdGj0ksKU2F+GHGlsKzhhOAKYeb8BYbq0tY1smXPYHw2FMKyrfhknK9xBsuCKDrFb+aSEcTTDbIMAKofSiC39leSRU9LuBKwT76ibX8P2zV77Aw== X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7ecab606-dce0-468d-7b1a-08d9003dd08f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Apr 2021 18:39:34.5962 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT054.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1NAM11HT223 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello! Thank you for reporting this bug. This bug was fixed in commit 8799369983315d799501b4f45a3954195b630ebb made on April 8th. You are correct that libc_nano.a should be for newlib-nano and libc.a should be for newlib. However, in the nano toolchain, both libc.a and libc_nano.a (which was recently added) are used for newlib-n [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [40.92.19.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [40.92.19.80 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (morgan.j.smith[at]outlook.com) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay 1.6 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46496-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Hello! Thank you for reporting this bug. This bug was fixed in commit 8799369983315d799501b4f45a3954195b630ebb made on April 8th. You are correct that libc_nano.a should be for newlib-nano and libc.a should be for newlib. However, in the nano toolchain, both libc.a and libc_nano.a (which was recently added) are used for newlib-nano. In the future, we should combine the nano and non-nano toolchain together so that it matches up with your (correct) intuition of what should be where. But that is a job for another day. Thanks, Morgan From unknown Fri Jun 20 18:25:16 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator