GNU bug report logs - #46495
28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Forwarded to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126

Full log


Message #187 received at 46495 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
Cc: andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com, dmalcolm <at> redhat.com, 46495 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit
 --with-wide-int
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:41:38 +0300
> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
> Cc: andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com, dmalcolm <at> redhat.com, 46495 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:24:07 +0000
> 
> > One question I have, that perhaps will be answered by the enhanced doc
> > strings, is this: how to run a batch compilation of a non-preloaded
> > file such that no subprocesses at all are used?
> 
> ATM there's no way.  The idea is that we typically don't want to run in
> the same process as libgccjit leaks memory (and contribute to memory
> fragmentation).  We do it only for
> `batch-byte-native-compile-for-bootstrap' as we know that the Emacs
> process will not last long.

But batch-native-compile is also going to exit once the compilation
ends, won't it?  Or is the difference that
batch-byte-native-compile-for-bootstrap only ever compiles a single
file?




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 43 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.