GNU bug report logs -
#46472
Make lisp/mail/uce.el obsolete
Previous Next
Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:59:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> No, please leave unnecessary changes out of emacs-28.
Even documentation changes?
I'd suggest installing the change as attached on emacs-28. If that's
not possible, I'd like to install it on master, but add the same text to
the package "Commentary" section on emacs-28.
> I would leave the original text intact, as dividing it into two splits
> the description of the package, and the additional text is too long to
> keep the beginning in mind.
OK.
> So I think the same message could be usefully conveyed with much fewer
> words.
I've tried shortening it in the attached.
>> +(defcustom uce-i-want-to-use-this nil
>> + "Non-nil means that you don't want the warning message about this package.
>> +See `uce-reply-to-uce' for background."
>> + :type 'boolean
>> + :version "28.1")
>
> This is redundant, since users that don't want this should not load
> the package.
OK, I'm fine with a non-optional warning.
> Why the same text again?
[...]
> And again?
So these were the three entry points I see: `describe-package', `C-h f',
and running the command. It is true that it should be enough to just
show the warning when running the command.
[0001-Recommend-against-using-uce.el.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 33 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.