From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 10 11:37:02 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2021 16:37:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sU9-0000YW-OW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:37:02 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sU7-0000Y6-Cp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:36:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sU5-0004Kv-WC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:36:58 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:55001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sU2-00074b-HB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:36:56 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.247.16.87 Received: from mimimi (lfbn-idf2-1-709-87.w86-247.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.247.16.87]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71F56E0013; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:36:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: ASDF build system sometimes fails to load .asd files properly Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:36:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87blcrubfi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.196; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay4-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.498, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.997, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yesterday I pushed 3aba721da73fbdc3382cc098c41596d5cfbb29eb "gnu: sbcl-quri: Update to 20200209", which fixes the tests for sbcl-quri. I noted: --88--- ; ; Test system must be loaded before, otherwise tests fail with: ;; Component QURI-ASD::QURI-TEST not found, required by # X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yesterday I pushed 3aba721da73fbdc3382cc098c41596d5cfbb29eb "gnu: sbcl-quri: Update to 20200209", which fixes the tests for sbcl-quri. I noted: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;; Test system must be loaded before, otherwise tests fail with: ;; Component QURI-ASD::QURI-TEST not found, required by #. '(#:asd-systems '("quri-test" "quri"))) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Our build system should be able to do better, we should not even have to specify the asd-systems here. After all, ASDF is smart enough. Note that: =2D If we don't specify the systems, the tests are still run and succeed(!), it's only the phase that fails with the aforementioned error. =2D If we specify the systems in the reverse order, it still fails! We've got this issue for many SBCL packages. Any clue? Guillaume? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmAkC6ESHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/R40H/jtjWbx0ZUDSkQBXjw4IS+swLOk99kZX uX+JjAJXTN3oyE5srwaNyf1L3gKep5sxoEoMewDGTvkiWakl8xp4M0u+DFuI001l muapHLVAttnOo7P1Cy0m/buLm8NyiTOxEX2YcLzMiq897zt+qtCMU4Rx6WcBFelI h82IWq1Q3o7D2XVRhJhnIphHVaK+V9p5dZEF0dq8vTVyndpp6sp0+dBJSkaJgOp9 Z2EpRKRJQ5EVKuvvMWXIZY/SaBUknomZXys8Jjhh07MHnV1t/UREpRhaBF1NFdn3 5qIfd6L0A8k3PtpAmTAx6Q/WrM3Kj2wkz9zhsCnsyqumrzSLQ84o1zs= =6DLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 12 05:26:07 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2021 10:26:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59979 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lAVeI-0002Ul-Rl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:26:07 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44140) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lAVeE-0002Ub-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:26:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAVeC-0001l6-TH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:26:01 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:42483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAVeA-00079E-3Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:26:00 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5CF160063 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:25:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1613125554; bh=qNEXW46379pp9vvUGptyoIM+tvuKswY4xv3qYfytt5o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=YnA/O3+Q7388oJo1/qbqt3FIpjP4MCCx03bxIXF1OoXXDQo3STFQpLboEAOnPxzbD dZdY2RojPhIzCuZMkoIsAaUx/+Ckl9kv1eVYuG3XWF/SsEC8soYCVF6zAJwCXPntW9 kAh2MhcFaAG5ivOPduFDazNGDOgI5lPc6T4+3JN+133VX+bbBUUb9cxuSJtx5WoUj4 Y5gkSJGWDnLjiMjtqNxRQdts7by0iLbuPVMQnAiMZafGqJ/3yVGRJb37Tb0dVa8vQT J8jsjEIHBtVMnv4L5mGlQ6ijGFT9PxpOYOy/410r2yuB2EUatH57ZznizmvLIPwtbi pJCIdwHH1lUEw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DcV5B0sVVz9rxH; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:25:48 +0100 (CET) References: <87blcrubfi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: ASDF build system sometimes fails to load .asd files properly In-reply-to: <87blcrubfi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:25:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9axvaz7.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Yesterday I pushed 3aba721da73fbdc3382cc098c41596d5cfbb29eb > "gnu: sbcl-quri: Update to 20200209", which fixes the tests for sbcl-quri. > > I noted: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ;; Test system must be loaded before, otherwise tests fail with: > ;; Component QURI-ASD::QURI-TEST not found, required by # ;; "quri">. > '(#:asd-systems '("quri-test" "quri"))) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Our build system should be able to do better, we should not even have to > specify the asd-systems here. After all, ASDF is smart enough. > > Note that: > > - If we don't specify the systems, the tests are still run and > succeed(!), it's only the phase that fails with the aforementioned > error. > > - If we specify the systems in the reverse order, it still fails! > > We've got this issue for many SBCL packages. > > Any clue? Guillaume? Currently we are using the 'asdf:load-asd' function to load system definitions (see the 'build' function in 'guix/build/asdf-build-system.scm' and the 'compile-systems' function in 'guix/build/lisp-utils.scm'). This function can only load one '.asd' file at a time, which is the cause of the issue. If we find how ASDF does the "lazy-load" of all the '.asd' files in a directory tree, and if we use that instead of 'load-asd', I think it would solve the issue and we could get rid of the 'asd-files' parameter in Guix package definitions. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYCZXrA8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j/FbAEAgQxFKvk/egIlBKIhX0glq53OPOxFjim4Xf7j 3IRy+AUA/2rrmGvsCH1zWuAaMUSMKWRO9n7MgRcLocUJp1st0Tff =05Rc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 16:55:39 2021 Received: (at 46424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 20:55:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34414 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leOYU-0004Qp-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:55:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:34687) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leOYT-0004Qh-KD for 46424@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:55:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id t18so3292623wry.1 for <46424@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:55:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j92A0HZrG87wxQB650dyPNfMURRSa0D97/GHPPVJd/4=; b=MnMg5KUtX+l+Zj3Z10X+WLkX3l1/GWnskf+l8JZ4+QPeOhf+AW9zmPyigzh+Ih3HGL 8wgQe7KAo6JdJ0K9bIJzs2u1gW76/1S0Fnjaa5OBceR03ZP/vy3AvMG/WyzgfdRcLVqp JEzeaG+ACinbIoKlEgbRWfLkLu80yU0hs6SWYAYG4Yk+LkDPKUbPPYU2Kf27BJ/0Ogfe R0N+wjt1i+3kMhyXy+cr+kiIdWJdiOzqI4chKpp6TpJPSk1oyhsc/8l7TbyzuhbgkHvh BVwWYZmxChYvwB/iSiSngV7Gb8fRYSW7vFwQ8i3Sssy788aW7ollH6On4r+uMSlnfXgp 1Gcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j92A0HZrG87wxQB650dyPNfMURRSa0D97/GHPPVJd/4=; b=RVG8bNb7Z4xkBEGh0otq6Hyw9NcoU9rBlpXyg3zEJLog5cxvsVsWMeYOdO7GT70tKE BGDNeA9jNvGIYYn3NRAAk63SyrqhkuuMBVbeRs3mXB1qfO+mF5rdf7l7thyfpPO84KeX dljZ9SPPsygTMo5q2bJq6Gr1xFYt7GjsMV0QlafanJnWD1jy8wVv4LT3R4glK9LciTQ7 3y2G4b27hNq/jfPV6SquCrlH8RkniTo7jNzeKUX1yJUMVbTsLJM0gVKZ5co+4O9BOD2A ggDflgvH5xhwCVshRa2WhKBYUN8GT+JbQp6EsKWDDqKcxLoNuhzu9+mykjyimZTjprgO zg6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533l2xOX2UuwP4sU6arSuJ05XdCj1ZW+BTrawKISZ/KKTlfqxsJr ZQfaPnwmLzfLTmTga/1IXU1ekcOSePDvBhLms8wqBDolJ/I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCyRaXOt5juc8CoidGzQU7Zinajaj6SbHYYEW/LhZSuL+Fqu3nlapPfGmjF96wmUVz5b0JOb95+JIyHEF1sg4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:10:: with SMTP id h16mr938793wrx.381.1620248131624; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:55:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sharlatan Hellseher Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 20:55:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Use load-systems or load-systems* To: 46424@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46424 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) SGkgSSd2ZSBqdXN0IGNoZWNrZWQgc291cmNlIG9mIEFTREYgYW5kIGl0IGxvb2tzIGxpa2UgdGhl cmUgaXMgYQ0KbmF0aXZlIG9wdGlvbiB0byBsb2FkIG11bHRpcGxlIHN5c3RlbXMgYXQgb25jZQ0K DQo+IC0tODwtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS1jdXQgaGVyZS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLXN0YXJ0LS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLT44LS0tPg0KICAoZGVmdW4gbG9hZC1zeXN0ZW1zKiAoc3lzdGVtcyAmcmVzdCBrZXlz KQ0KICAgICJMb2FkaW5nIG11bHRpcGxlIHN5c3RlbXMgYXQgb25jZS4iDQogICAgKGRvbGlzdCAo cyBzeXN0ZW1zKSAoYXBwbHkgJ2xvYWQtc3lzdGVtIHMga2V5cykpKQ0KDQogIChkZWZ1biBsb2Fk LXN5c3RlbXMgKCZyZXN0IHN5c3RlbXMpDQogICAgIkxvYWRpbmcgbXVsdGlwbGUgc3lzdGVtcyBh dCBvbmNlLiINCiAgICAobG9hZC1zeXN0ZW1zKiBzeXN0ZW1zKSkNCi0tODwtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS1jdXQgaGVyZS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLWVuZC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLT44LS0tDQoNCmh0dHBz Oi8vZ2l0bGFiLmNvbW1vbi1saXNwLm5ldC9hc2RmL2FzZGYvLS9ibG9iL21hc3Rlci9vcGVyYXRl Lmxpc3AjTDE1NQ0KDQotLSANCuKApiDQvdCw0Ygg0YDQsNC30YPQvCAtINC/0YDQtdCy0L7RgdGF 0L7QtNC90LDRjyDQvtCx0YrRj9GB0L3QuNGC0LXQu9GM0L3QsNGPINC80LDRiNC40L3QsCDQutC+ 0YLQvtGA0LDRjyDRgdC/0L7RgdC+0LHQvdCwDQrQvdCw0LnRgtC4INGB0LzRi9GB0Lsg0L/QvtGH 0YLQuCDQsiDRh9C10Lwg0YPQs9C+0LTQvdC+LCDQuNGB0YLQvtC70LrQvtCy0LDRgtGMINC70Y7Q sdC+0Lkg0YTQtdC90L7QvNC10L0sINC90L4NCtGB0L7QstC10YDRiNC10L3QvdC+INC90LUg0LIg 0YHQvtGB0YLQvtGP0L3QuNC4INC/0YDQuNC90Y/RgtGMINC80YvRgdC70Ywg0L4g0L3QtdC/0YDQ tdC00YHQutCw0LfRg9C10LzQvtGB0YLQuC4NCg== From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 08 05:38:21 2021 Received: (at 46424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2021 09:38:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49119 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfJPh-0002VX-FP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 05:38:21 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfJPd-0002VM-H2 for 46424@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 05:38:19 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECD22400FC for <46424@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:38:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1620466690; bh=eZtCd0ksmTHzlTWXxmhUFGt7SbxOoNi0OL/XRqIeMK0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=cNprtyg5o8l8drLTmHLUlUm2kSczCmMhUkoooXrwWESLc7K18BCTHS1boSDOwxt6n Xw/o7zMzhXJrRGUu7rD3/I/coNtFo5GX0YVDX5ZIk9P1UB8Ztq4XdV0Pe5BvdqU5ns 0g0Eg1uhHPen7FzmX4hRK3jWJxn2FyRUomaji1pYsMzgDscls6nAcdUyoITshfhxpy ROCEgp08h5auTeETYyHG8uEhRN4TG8d+GWRT+qA77JiNz8bd9EjjB3cULEZHV2/E7f AbijIOm+nigPqsg0jaC47aOJQJSqj0bG4GIoJlP3GDKEI8OeZe2MBDnCiiZJ6k34aX qFVs4jaAD/ROQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Fcj0w6Kw0z6tmN; Sat, 8 May 2021 11:38:08 +0200 (CEST) References: <87blcrubfi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: 46424@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#46424: Use load-systems or load-systems* In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 09:37:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87tundin0p.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46424 Cc: Pierre Neidhardt , Sharlatan Hellseher X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain In the case of quri, it looks like the problem comes from the "(asdf:clear-system c)" call at the end of "quri-test.asd". When removing it, the build succeeds even without the custom 'asd-systems' argument in the Guix package definition. So it looks like the lazy loading of system definitions is working in asdf-build-system after all. I guess it's the default behaviour of 'load-asd'. However I don't know why this 'clear-system' call messes up the ASDF configuration in asdf-build-system, but it doesn't seem to cause problems in Quicklisp... --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYJZb9g8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9KggD/WHWRZzIEATDiPsPVfZ2R4iX4XS47gz2I2glb K620W+0A/1gqoMKYfCUNBmI7ixjD8zyVQX/nw11cSuRM0trIHiTS =GQGM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 08 06:00:37 2021 Received: (at 46424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2021 10:00:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfJlE-0002ie-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 06:00:37 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:60237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfJlC-0002iX-0n for 46424@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 May 2021 06:00:35 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A3801C000B; Sat, 8 May 2021 10:00:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Guillaume Le Vaillant , 46424@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#46424: Use load-systems or load-systems* In-Reply-To: <87tundin0p.fsf@kitej> References: <87blcrubfi.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tundin0p.fsf@kitej> Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 12:00:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87im3ttuiu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Interesting. This reminds me of a puzzling issue I recently had while working on the Nyxt .asd: - (asdf:load-asd "/path/to/nyxt.asd") - (asdf:make :nyxt/quicklisp) The nyxt/quicklisp system would call ql:update-dist and then would fail, saying it cannot find "nyxt/quicklisp" (which it is running!) because ql:update-dist would lead ASDF to somehow forget about th [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46424 Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Interesting. This reminds me of a puzzling issue I recently had while working on the Nyxt .asd: - (asdf:load-asd "/path/to/nyxt.asd") - (asdf:make :nyxt/quicklisp) The nyxt/quicklisp system would call ql:update-dist and then would fail, saying it cannot find "nyxt/quicklisp" (which it is running!) because ql:update-dist would lead ASDF to somehow forget about th [...] Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.197 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.197 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Interesting. This reminds me of a puzzling issue I recently had while working on the Nyxt .asd: =2D (asdf:load-asd "/path/to/nyxt.asd") =2D (asdf:make :nyxt/quicklisp) The nyxt/quicklisp system would call ql:update-dist and then would fail, saying it cannot find "nyxt/quicklisp" (which it is running!) because ql:update-dist would lead ASDF to somehow forget about the .asd. Adding (asdf:load-asd "/path/to/nyxt.asd") right after ql:update-dist fixes it. I've reworked the whole thing different on Nyxt's master branch, so this is no longer an issue. Maybe there is a hint lurking in there... =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmCWYTkSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/HbEH/0gwbO/aKE1kpOEKA6FvAzpdn8MrJJRB o3ZjclK0iS/7vtyRljw/ueabcaeZWN9eKsNMQ5KVILypWdqzLMrjTaVnVO5awg58 fIPqwy3WvJpLqiKFhKjvf4m/NNZsZeVGHfLT1s1LuRL1WXncaXyDjDd6dHLOOIYA k3BNxwkuNdoN1wjirXKZj3E8PvcKFJvPSwzcQJCnzABGOM9/wRC1DByo9kV0h23/ SsT95U2XswPdSO6l915ZWK2p4JNJrH4qhZXQYCvpVb1aXQERYc/BM2M6hMdd5voV eO9glgrzewcsmw2govWIo3SXA+WEmNVFYUEaKx4xk6CF90q+wwkOubM= =f/n9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 05 05:13:23 2022 Received: (at 46424-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2022 09:13:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46415 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oV8AV-0006Os-Jv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 05:13:23 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:43093) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oV8AT-0006Oe-Ug for 46424-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2022 05:13:22 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3AE6240103 for <46424-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 11:13:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1662369195; bh=iQ6FpSlBPhBXzBYiydUoO3HmdnJOBPeFLFi9f+ZtoN0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Z1I0W4BNsLVl1UEl/Nug419pg9E8D9+81w5pnueG561tSF6p7PDlAX3R8GcYlTBI/ x5ht9gq9haFrgBk1ramSRuC46ijOdcWPzuKwU2+bfDKYRbzrK6ZmCyKH5DqjeijlTd dhsF9KKXonrODCebHfsV71u0GsqoQfvQQ9cEt3M32FoDgf8C9M5hvcCnVVYe4XqBFi RX/hASiGeLs2Bszjb6K9P6r9V7Z6MfwaadYslPI907rKU4dcOfTBHUF1BtnzGx/Ml0 i3vjjv6wcpqsIoZ6NhJPyyXfEs4N35l8zL1RLCIhQZq+qEgDvkF4gdGF8A+WFKdiCF qoQ8ix55r+aDA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MLjVJ47CYz9rxS for <46424-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2022 11:13:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: 46424-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: ASDF build system sometimes fails to load .asd files properly Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:10:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87bkrub2vs.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46424-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain This has been fixed with commit 6b5ef03a2582ab23228478018fd356e17db1daea. Closing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYxW9pw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9t7wEAj5JXQAqnvPd+QPmoyvAHCKgz79BoiB1x7UbM 5JmKiiIBAJiBQioaYQ0QmKH1cwSykiu1VTOxKLWkJzCu4bYSnHyh =/Mts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator