GNU bug report logs - #46391
[PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 00:41:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#46391: closed (Re: bug#46391: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path
 load-path option)
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:48:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#46391: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 46391 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
46391: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46391
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46391-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#46391: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:46:59 +0100
Hi!

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> This fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/46390>.
>
> The test suite does not check relative path for the load-path option.
> I do not know what is the best to add a test about that.
>
> Last, I remember discussions about absolute/relative path and I do not know
> if this 'canonicalize-path' addition is the best fix here.
>
>
> All the best,
> simon
>
>
> zimoun (1):
>   scripts: build: Fix relative load-path.
>
>  guix/scripts/build.scm | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

I’m discovering this after having independently addreses #46390, sorry
about that!  (Perhaps we should always send patches that fix bugs to the
corresponding bug report rather than/in addition to guix-patches?)

Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option
Date: Tue,  9 Feb 2021 01:40:11 +0100
Hi,

This fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/46390>.

The test suite does not check relative path for the load-path option.
I do not know what is the best to add a test about that.

Last, I remember discussions about absolute/relative path and I do not know
if this 'canonicalize-path' addition is the best fix here.


All the best,
simon


zimoun (1):
  scripts: build: Fix relative load-path.

 guix/scripts/build.scm | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


base-commit: 4cd8bab7d4b345c5538b8d039d84a957df7a235f
-- 
2.29.2




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 75 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.