From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 08 19:40:46 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 00:40:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9H5C-0007AD-77 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:40:46 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41420) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9H59-0007A3-Cu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:40:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9H54-0003js-Kd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:40:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]:36387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9H4v-000575-4s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 19:40:37 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id u14so19534782wri.3 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:40:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O63G9efLZmWPUTOD08oKhKY6zs2UkVPmXAfsMUAfL0o=; b=Ne4el087McqYCA6EgPqvR07tTsCi7JQgoRJPS12PZQsR1EmJ5KHEEO+OnGaP91AIwZ IuIJyMERo1SJ1+FfS6VNndPSmMx8OSp3JqSAw5dC6+/h/JzJ5DHGEK73KN3g6jbECX0Y Rjoh98JWSypfyPWdVtjsRvU6JqvgUaUG/rETbopBoQa91HUXH2FBOgkjR+8rjfQg0Rhr rg6Ffn/DwkcRjTBsDrK8DMzN4jRCynl5YpYmfVSezmECT6W5oTlCwCxjYRu3LA5qtXMT ohd1FGPB+dtH7SN7tQiq9jO47d/pG+jqEZKHqwGZCBn2znY9tfBli+UQQlsvx+j64xhh PbBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O63G9efLZmWPUTOD08oKhKY6zs2UkVPmXAfsMUAfL0o=; b=aSZGM496BZvsGik7PM8ROdMKmUc5fvLcxzql+MS6XiBNg+0nKeAVGHAvW99bT/odRE HjSzNyocECanku78rZSSnuXyktzHfrJumsvsI3b4b4ph3ov0Ava6ZNaIXG9Ch0mXCODh OOyCMyYxHNm80jBji7cWA2D8XPwXbyk9AMdDfkgLoCQLJBLc8Z9YugdOLQHUY5bBPLNE 91S2L5H5SCcHtBdC+75jr1CbUbrhY99Objr68glr2Wh52MwgSLbycWMF29lExTiczX1N hhO3pn7ajAPY6ZCJHHfQ7ZYh9RA5p7IGgx2pRegxYqnPT1M1kz4sBjpvsnCCuxTLxHli 1plQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TaY5MYR07xX/HJPoZjiTSmj7oI04iNSaBhDkk3XlOEcTFh/+8 Zvj/Z9LNYzyMeEylWzJp4AbErAkh+Fg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJ83Ykb50aV0SVCOYdCTFggX/8MTp3C2cwoL4nprydt7gVGnThCFMp25m4Ab6OYQERPa9s1A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6045:: with SMTP id j5mr22343583wrt.365.1612831225047; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:40:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([193.48.40.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm1319527wmq.7.2021.02.08.16.40.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:40:24 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:40:11 +0100 Message-Id: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, This fixes . The test suite does not check relative path for the load-path option. I do not know what is the best to add a test about that. Last, I remember discussions about absolute/relative path and I do not know if this 'canonicalize-path' addition is the best fix here. All the best, simon zimoun (1): scripts: build: Fix relative load-path. guix/scripts/build.scm | 16 +++++++++------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) base-commit: 4cd8bab7d4b345c5538b8d039d84a957df7a235f -- 2.29.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 17:47:10 2021 Received: (at 46391-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 22:47:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF2w2-000143-3K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:47:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF2w0-00013p-JS for 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:47:08 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF2vt-00063Z-Ui; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:47:03 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=48964 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lF2vt-0008Ac-G1; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:47:01 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#46391: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option References: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:46:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:40:11 +0100") Message-ID: <87blc92ie4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46391-done Cc: 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! zimoun skribis: > This fixes . > > The test suite does not check relative path for the load-path option. > I do not know what is the best to add a test about that. > > Last, I remember discussions about absolute/relative path and I do not kn= ow > if this 'canonicalize-path' addition is the best fix here. > > > All the best, > simon > > > zimoun (1): > scripts: build: Fix relative load-path. > > guix/scripts/build.scm | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) I=E2=80=99m discovering this after having independently addreses #46390, so= rry about that! (Perhaps we should always send patches that fix bugs to the corresponding bug report rather than/in addition to guix-patches?) Let me know what you think. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 24 18:12:23 2021 Received: (at 46391-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 23:12:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36186 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3KR-0001ix-I8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:12:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:33162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lF3KP-0001if-AJ for 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:12:21 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 7so3461784wrz.0 for <46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaYenRLGWFfMgU7sRoSJt5JiGPASIleU0C/uXjFxswA=; b=XI/kTtY9QI44IA+3sUAMAo4QSPeTzmtvpqs7W37gIAVZ0zkwk5jZ/LTrOK0YVlAJOD YR98leyglqlojGwxWJ92K8OGbTPnNJQ7Ven7iGxaeY9fs/XuRV+5sB5j1bg+YU+jjOrq 4firwMPCV+caFD68ceBzZLL2YCI6pP6w9JUBXx3MGA1WN6yD01sdcyAZYxiMqDYEBVti /smXTgyOgmbPXS8R/qaphnhD04354W7cRkfHoQC32dnFAXWkd5O/bTWmJtW5RgDlbROT GGD607kL/x7KStm7Opwdm6jcakO+6qguTVtzCQBGVDNSRm415TZIlNOD3wwKc+0L370G 19kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaYenRLGWFfMgU7sRoSJt5JiGPASIleU0C/uXjFxswA=; b=phCRp4b7j6l7AgspQGUNDqqqaoQsw1oTAqwEwrJzX0ax67nzMi6uB55X/n3fdWrRBk B0QQsEwZUImgyjRXrE1/SOc4TAi/JLulUUHKHX87Syuv8aHROSO9401hIjgp/3xeqdKs eA2JZ2nSjYg/SJyROy4bv7iXRsxZwpsIKTR45Ar2QMjrbUzXgdNlR2NqoHvAEMc55izV /Ml341nOv+2438EJNxf7PuQ/Kz6T+MAwH+prneIDwHAgA8gwdkD/Z0g4hha010Wg1wR2 wNW9Bhq7ig9MNir9bDHCo88R5c9qLAtuj5eBAFXBi1gwFWuNtVVlb1j1v0nkikoPONEP OC6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iVCd2I5SERV5w2PvHf1Hh5E8Kgn50a/xUCMcDcZPwqSI47tfE 7W6Xblr7+9QpbzAi9s6Yo12vV1wy+pM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyhaFXfV0aTf0u92HbaUagxRGR22FX/zoHG31pgQVQI5NP2QfEPe3ZXb+BlXuko39KcmgdWw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb52:: with SMTP id c18mr376744wrs.4.1614208335394; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s20sm98674wmj.36.2021.02.24.15.12.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#46391: [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option In-Reply-To: <87blc92ie4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <87blc92ie4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: <86lfbdkqzc.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46391-done Cc: 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludo, On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 23:46, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > I=E2=80=99m discovering this after having independently addreses #46390, = sorry > about that! (Perhaps we should always send patches that fix bugs to the > corresponding bug report rather than/in addition to guix-patches?) Anyway, because your patch is better than mine. :-) In general, I try to at least mention in bug-guix the number from guix-patches. Sometimes, I directly send the patch to bug-guix. It depends on my mood I guess. :-) Well, I do not have an opinion. Maybe tiny patch (like this) that fixes bug should be sent to the corresponding bug report. And larger patches should be sent to guix-patches; it eases to keep separated the discussion about the bug and about the patches, IMHO. Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 03 08:30:09 2021 Received: (at 46391-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2021 13:30:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55375 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHRZp-0001td-MM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 08:30:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:42769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHRZn-0001s3-Pv for 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 08:30:08 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id j2so10835745wrx.9 for <46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:30:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=rRJ4aXZ+Q7Bu4cCqirY9zOgE1h41Lge1q9aq+ZSmDBg=; b=YWfaRtxekbrQgxkM3aDonllniKK8cJAXB7VUcbECj2FZaUtdRcdUtWABmr3ZvSb8yI nsBXhTyxigL9I0DfgA7TT78iKTt+Kr8fCpsLvx8E7ORphx9uwC+1wNRHEe93IonIYbrn LX8nMivBtiGVBJAAP9ANMf/l8mRnW7ejDvS1wdy1Rxdp0lD+8jUX0plNMtOmLUDgsx1L B2kaofYDPJcRSu8/OWSaPYsAbMClOfDep3hsXlhgzMNRmQ63d1gDjOjrJBGyW1U3T17Z MpvioCmOsr68/ZB6gWFroTI8F3KhqIBOITAYIhOBpUwif/e36NyM1L9YaCEajFvhqd0F cwXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=rRJ4aXZ+Q7Bu4cCqirY9zOgE1h41Lge1q9aq+ZSmDBg=; b=t4nUcnDC/Er5EhwdXCsrF/7/Ly9dNRhwyAaTsP3Es+H6iw5uLu72fmjdzeCVL5J4xb HpLU4HjbSZBLA+VufAb98+VAzy76W33bK8/2rRmX/k7TbvZGdNOII61SKSpptUaC0PXB El/3jYQJEjNe1ksQgcBT57DOruedwdwl4hA6NKuASPSeSUbqVCD0GSPWXHoFSrzo0pNj 2XYsUw6RHSSqYLUXeF0Y3r2/ElpaeYSQr01c4cF4gvAfnjwr8FbHzf6aRQpPIQH2iDRB hQYpEz/WiFf11hXx9sRvtVZUgfAf5sSN0WGb9OHvj6KUnU9tRzGTdHf36rDSe0dVCOva NtJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CZr9oznSO/6vCYCC+spEle/68KlHE78lWMYHZ9dyS+GZWbJM/ PEYFODbKE3idquQM3EkrHhdWMUxfrKo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4JGTXAueGwAoXX8gNeNmO/s4GAmZr9F47/bZ2OulQDavBk48nDDNoaqgj44lQ3s3wv9ZQoA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f8cd:: with SMTP id f13mr26422537wrq.27.1614778202299; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:30:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z188sm7905156wme.32.2021.03.03.05.30.01 for <46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:30:01 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun To: 46391-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#46391] [PATCH 0/1] Canonicalize-path load-path option References: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:18:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210209004011.14176-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:40:11 +0100") Message-ID: <878s7dek0o.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 at 01:40, zimoun wrote: > This fixes . Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46391-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 at 01:40, zimoun wrote: > This fixes . Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.221.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.221.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zimon.toutoune[at]gmail.com) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Hi, On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 at 01:40, zimoun wrote: > This fixes . Fixed by 9a38bed2cf32e9462badfa43e74cdd4580e804fc. > The test suite does not check relative path for the load-path option. > I do not know what is the best to add a test about that. > > Last, I remember discussions about absolute/relative path and I do not know > if this 'canonicalize-path' addition is the best fix here. [...] > zimoun (1): > scripts: build: Fix relative load-path. I even forgot to send the patch. :-) Anyway, closing! All the best, simon From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:17:14 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator