GNU bug report logs -
#46390
“guix lint -L relative/path foo“ fails
Previous Next
Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 22:47:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 22 Feb 2021 12:15:12 +0100
with message-id <87r1l8bbgf.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#46390: “guix lint -L relative/path foo“ fails
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #46390,
regarding “guix lint -L relative/path foo“ fails
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
46390: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46390
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
Here an example to reproduce. Everything is fine with the full path…
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ cat /tmp/example/hello.scm
(define-module (hello)
#:use-module (guix packages)
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
#:use-module (guix git-download)
#:use-module (guix licenses))
(define-public hi
(package
(name "hi")
(version "2.10")
(source (origin
(method git-fetch)
(uri (git-reference
(url "https://example.org/hello-example.git")
(commit "e1eefd033b8a2c4c81babc6fde08ebb116c6abb8")))
(sha256
(base32
"1im1gglfm4k10bh4mdaqzmx3lm3kivnsmxrvl6vyvmfqqzljq75l"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(synopsis "Hello, GNU world: An example GNU package")
(description
"GNU Hello prints the message \"Hello, world!\" and then exits. It
serves as an example of standard GNU coding practices. As such, it supports
command-line arguments, multiple languages, and so on.")
(home-page "https://www.gnu.org/software/hello/")
(license gpl3+)))
$ guix lint -L /tmp/example hi -c source-file-name
/tmp/example/hello.scm:11:12: hi <at> 2.10 : le nom du fichier source devrait contenir le nom du paquet
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
…but breaks with relative path:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ cd /tmp/
$ guix lint -L example hi -c source-file-name
Backtrace:
13 (primitive-load "/home/sitour/.config/guix/current/bin/guix")
In guix/ui.scm:
2150:12 12 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1736:10 11 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
1731:15 10 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7ff41750b750 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1815:7 (exn)> _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 9 (for-each #<procedure 7ff4175090e0 at guix/scripts/lint.scm:222:23 (spec)> ("hi"))
In guix/scripts/lint.scm:
65:4 8 (run-checkers #<package hi <at> 2.10 example/hello.scm:8 7ff415cc7dc0> (#<<lint-checker> name: source-file-name descripti…>) …)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 7 (for-each #<procedure 7ff40797f480 at guix/scripts/lint.scm:65:14 (checker)> (#<<lint-checker> name: source-file-name…>))
In guix/scripts/lint.scm:
74:21 6 (_ _)
In guix/lint.scm:
897:9 5 (check-source-file-name _)
148:18 4 (%make-warning #<package hi <at> 2.10 example/hello.scm:8 7ff415cc7dc0> "the source file name should contain the package n…" …)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1731:15 3 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7ff40797f1e0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1815:7 (exn)> _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
In ice-9/ports.scm:
440:11 2 (call-with-input-file #f #<procedure 7ff40797f120 at guix/packages.scm:482:11 (port)> #:binary _ #:encoding _ # _)
In unknown file:
1 (open-file #f "r" #:encoding #f #:guess-encoding #f)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Wrong type (expecting string): #f
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The reason is from ’package-field-location’ in (guix packages):
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(catch 'system-error
(lambda ()
;; In general we want to keep relative file names for modules.
(call-with-input-file (search-path %load-path file)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
the ’search-path’ returns #f. Somehow, the %load-path should only
contain absolute paths and here it is not the case. Therefore, the fix
should be in (guix build):
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define %standard-build-options
;; List of standard command-line options for tools that build something.
(list (option '(#\L "load-path") #t #f
(lambda (opt name arg result . rest)
;; XXX: Imperatively modify the search paths.
(%package-module-path (cons arg (%package-module-path)))
(%patch-path (cons arg (%patch-path)))
(set! %load-path (cons arg %load-path))
(set! %load-compiled-path (cons arg %load-compiled-path))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
For instance using ’canonicalize-path’.
All the best,
simon
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> …but breaks with relative path:
>
> $ cd /tmp/
> $ guix lint -L example hi -c source-file-name
> Backtrace:
> 13 (primitive-load "/home/sitour/.config/guix/current/bin/guix")
> In guix/ui.scm:
> 2150:12 12 (run-guix-command _ . _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1736:10 11 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
> 1731:15 10 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7ff41750b750 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1815:7 (exn)> _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 634:9 9 (for-each #<procedure 7ff4175090e0 at guix/scripts/lint.scm:222:23 (spec)> ("hi"))
> In guix/scripts/lint.scm:
> 65:4 8 (run-checkers #<package hi <at> 2.10 example/hello.scm:8 7ff415cc7dc0> (#<<lint-checker> name: source-file-name descripti…>) …)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 634:9 7 (for-each #<procedure 7ff40797f480 at guix/scripts/lint.scm:65:14 (checker)> (#<<lint-checker> name: source-file-name…>))
> In guix/scripts/lint.scm:
> 74:21 6 (_ _)
> In guix/lint.scm:
> 897:9 5 (check-source-file-name _)
> 148:18 4 (%make-warning #<package hi <at> 2.10 example/hello.scm:8 7ff415cc7dc0> "the source file name should contain the package n…" …)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1731:15 3 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7ff40797f1e0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1815:7 (exn)> _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
> In ice-9/ports.scm:
> 440:11 2 (call-with-input-file #f #<procedure 7ff40797f120 at guix/packages.scm:482:11 (port)> #:binary _ #:encoding _ # _)
> In unknown file:
> 1 (open-file #f "r" #:encoding #f #:guess-encoding #f)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1669:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> Wrong type (expecting string): #f
>
>
> The reason is from ’package-field-location’ in (guix packages):
>
> (catch 'system-error
> (lambda ()
> ;; In general we want to keep relative file names for modules.
> (call-with-input-file (search-path %load-path file)
Indeed. Fixed in 9a38bed2cf32e9462badfa43e74cdd4580e804fc.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 86 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.