GNU bug report logs - #46374
28.0.50; Ask me to save buffers only if they are under callers dir

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:33:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: fixed

Merged with 50380

Fixed in version 28.0.60

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 46374 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Hauke Rehfeld <hauke <at> haukerehfeld.de>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: bug#46374: 28.0.50; Ask me to save buffers only if they are under callers dir
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 19:21:34 +0300
> Being able to set `save-some-buffers-root' as the value of
> `save-some-buffers-default-predicate' is easy for users.
>
> The problem I see is that it hides the real nature of `save-some-buffers-root':
> - it's not a predicate (as the docstring of `save-some-buffers-default-predicate' suggests).
> - it's a function generating the default predicate.
>
> We can make the distinction (default predicate <-> func generating a default predicate)
> more clear if we put the generating functions in a list.
>
> Then, we can restrict the allowed pred-fun to the elements inside such a list.
>
> I have played today with this quick-and-dirty patch:
> How do you think?

Nice idea, and it's better than what I proposed.
The only change that I suggest is instead of a list,
to put a special symbol on the symbol property,
for example:

  (put 'save-some-buffers-root 'higher-order-function t)
or simply
  (put 'save-some-buffers-root 'hof t)

A better name is appreciated.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 193 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.