Subject: bug#46351: 28.0.50; Add convenient way to bypass Eshell's own pipelining

From: Sean Whitton <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:42:18 -0700

Hello,

On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 09:48PM +01, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> Sean Whitton <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>> ... but in the wrong patch, sigh.  Revision attached.
>
> Oops; the old one is already pushed.  Can you supply an additional patch
> for this?

I put the "... ends here" fix into 667e212048 rather than 1693423fd7
which is not now fixable.  However, I also noticed that
em-extpipe-tests.el lacks a `provide' form so here is a fix for that.
Pretty sure that's it for now.  Thank you for reviewing and applying!

-- 
Sean Whitton
>From 67017d9f13ce6f4c2ae6106b84db8d883b8ed551 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Whitton <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 14:40:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ; Fix missing `provide' in recently introduced
 em-extpipe-tests.el

---
 test/lisp/eshell/em-extpipe-tests.el | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/lisp/eshell/em-extpipe-tests.el b/test/lisp/eshell/em-extpipe-tests.el
index 1283b6b361..8b69e0504d 100644
--- a/test/lisp/eshell/em-extpipe-tests.el
+++ b/test/lisp/eshell/em-extpipe-tests.el
@@ -202,4 +202,6 @@ em-extpipe-test-16
       (eshell-command-result-p input "rab")
       (eshell-command-result-p "echo \"bar\" | rev" "nonsense"))))
 
+(provide 'em-extpipe-tests)
+
 ;;; em-extpipe-tests.el ends here
-- 
2.30.2