Subject: Re: bug#46351: 28.0.50; Add convenient way to bypass Eshell's own pipelining

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:55:06 +0100

Sean Whitton <[email-masked]> writes:

> I've added actually running the commands and examining the results to
> several of the tests.  I found a way to show different output in the
> case of *| vs. | by using cl-letf to redefine some Lisp functions.

This leads to:

Test em-extpipe-test-14 condition:
    (ert-test-failed
     ((should
       (string-match-p regexp
		       (buffer-substring-no-properties ... ...)))
      :form
      (string-match-p "baz\nbar" "bazbar\n")
      :value nil))
   FAILED   6/16  em-extpipe-test-14 (0.119788 sec)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no