From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 18:55:56 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 23:55:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7oTa-0000Fp-FU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 18:55:56 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7oTZ-0000Fi-0r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 18:55:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7oTY-0004Ha-Ec for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 18:55:52 -0500 Received: from cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.47]:44981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7oTW-0002aU-CT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 18:55:52 -0500 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E5E1E23E5 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 23:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-15-8.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.15.8]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EAD911E293B for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 23:55:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.15.8 (trex/6.0.2); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 23:55:46 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Broad-Trouble: 0a91b65175b3d5b9_1612482946160_3338577330 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1612482946160:1868883921 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1612482946160 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A651D7EBFF for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:55:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=ISTkgFK0J4FTLSI8FO gZegHGR5g=; b=Dhyr4OZF1lkTKdu9WbIlIFonKM6Og/7OiH8PeBf/UW4EyvGsMa XCsMJMDEtiMJJNouWmv3M4XuNcScZHBoXgWN6QGrfHttnSpEakmN3hljHow3GQ3f oPc9jvYIpM7bF+T8ufMQgMt4QmCD/5Dd8e9qF5iP1i7X24lfCDLhg6zjQ= Received: from jidanni.org (114-46-61-242.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.46.61.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F16E7E760 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:55:45 -0800 (PST) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a9 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: HTML+ mode vs. quotes Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:57:42 +0800 Message-ID: <87tuqrphjt.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.212.47; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Not sure if fixed yet. emacs-version "27.1" $ emacs -q file.html using: TEST

Never mind ' here to here '. But...

If there is a unmatched =E3=80=8C here,

Then any text beyond ' here becomes a different color,

That lasts though here,

And only after ' here, finially stops.

However now ' here to here ' looks different too!

It's a bad looking emacs' problem. That's a fact. And it could influence the rest of the file. Unless one call's it quits :-)

From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 05 04:42:07 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2021 09:42:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42837 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7xct-0006WU-Bv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:42:07 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7xcq-0006VV-Uv for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:42:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=idgmXlTxQbsFakC1ZeM0S4fT7Y0Z0OXONGpfoiT0VXY=; b=fp38TKBBY4Djnp4tXE2st3a4Eo n+EDLL/IucvolnfpJ7RnKQ5pmQQWfyNpu2zRJb994V3cOEY0H0nmyYcBut38bsLsqudkMJ8uSo9vN WNIWnjzN/Vn7XP6SM72ramUrYfbaiN7vU4JV8lOpgAswyPkAnGoRHww3ISPBOMhJy5q8=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7xcj-0000ze-DJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:41:59 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:41:56 +0100 Message-Id: <871rdulul7.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #46312 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: forcemerge 46312 40844 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) forcemerge 46312 40844 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 05 04:43:05 2021 Received: (at 46312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2021 09:43:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7xdo-0006YZ-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:43:05 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7xdn-0006Xl-G5 for 46312@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:43:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+fdemo90Gm+rplJ2FI+nWiZ287DpEW79N9gC0DI0cd8=; b=TJwQurGGzmSc07CX3/oDaMV/LF nXvYJPaJlj3aBNWl7YHyF91PArfieE7C8SGuwZPfnLg2gPKfmad8hOJ3Rv2jSzafedhSM8YL7FvNG smUcLIABPR9fh+69rVxqpi7C2Z3KcaUbvLdRUdkcv8CdXYhszJBxwpn2W7KcV3bYUZ94=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7xdf-000103-5V; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:42:57 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#46312: HTML+ mode vs. quotes References: <87tuqrphjt.5.fsf@jidanni.org> X-Now-Playing: Julie Driscoll's _1969_: "Leaving It All Behind" Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:42:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tuqrphjt.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuepjeS4ueWwvA==?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:57:42 +0800") Message-ID: <87wnvmkfz6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: >

If there is a unmatched 「 here,

You reported this in 40844 and 43941 and probably some other ones, too. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46312 Cc: 46312@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: >

If there is a unmatched =E3=80=8C here,

You reported this in 40844 and 43941 and probably some other ones, too. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 13 08:21:53 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2021 12:21:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsP7h-0001Oe-4T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:21:53 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53460) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsP7f-0001O5-Ot for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 08:21:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=u8YjlLr2OEdbQC39soN53XmfbzE5w4LTl6U08CHE/MQ=; b=NxXoOv/68JSfqhyHXWRkEUHFp9 L7Q6bzJa1f60di349DmYHhT+FBKn2uXz2gkZC7zG1caiiMJrEbYThrWT/bpsnyqnb1n3PEU6q6PDE yPb+Y22H/31uxNf1Z7E6uFIRc4rj+layNVaCwsKaT4ZVPB4McbPk1z0FrSonXuJhS0gg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lsP7Y-0003wx-Cz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:21:46 +0200 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 14:21:43 +0200 Message-Id: <877diy3qg8.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #40844 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 40844 + patch quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) tags 40844 + patch quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:00:34 2021 Received: (at 46312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2021 13:00:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmCg-0003FZ-7q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:00:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmCd-0003Ey-2M; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:00:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=11ezYrRWSh1DTSWeyOzNXm2hE9+eNYck/zcYMCEXTC8=; b=Ar131ZATzLJv31zcN0Mcxkz/N6 FxMaxTF/b59vk9BwELWVvcjjK4ZGdF35ynQ/NOHhL+l4qZbcSn9vgvL3Bt7wVe2WB6uXjva0urKe4 Bu+GsKwy9Ce2fDmV4TH+QAImWGqibsucjqbicysoJVM8IojAySumENl56l3IwB98/pG0=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmCP-0000zM-J6; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stephen Berman Subject: Re: bug#46312: HTML+ mode vs. quotes References: <87pn5oq1hj.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <831ri34i0b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8l7zdh6.fsf@rub.de> <83o8l731yd.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qzzae2.fsf@rub.de> <83lfgb2yss.fsf@gnu.org> <87d01nz7gb.fsf@rub.de> <83blh72vlk.fsf@gnu.org> <878scbyw3s.fsf@rub.de> <87sgai76oj.fsf@gmx.net> <878s3e3qgf.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8735tlljin.fsf@gmx.net> X-Now-Playing: Grimes's _Miss Anthropocene_: "Delete Forever" Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735tlljin.fsf@gmx.net> (Stephen Berman's message of "Sun, 13 Jun 2021 20:14:08 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stephen Berman writes: > Upthread Eli said "some SGML/HTML expert should say if that is TRT". > I'm no such expert so I can't make that decision. I'm not either, but at this point I'd rather apply the patch and then we can see whether some SGML expert pipes up... Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46312 Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, Eli Zaretskii , 40844@debbugs.gnu.org, 43941@debbugs.gnu.org, 46312@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Stephen Berman writes: > Upthread Eli said "some SGML/HTML expert should say if that is TRT". > I'm no such expert so I can't make that decision. I'm not either, but at this point I'd rather apply the patch and then we can see whether some SGML expert pipes up... > Here's the test, in case someone else wants to see if > they can figure it out; I haven't succeeded: Just needs a `font-lock-ensure' after `html-mode'. :-) Then the test fails without your patch, and passes with your patch. So I went ahead and pushed your patch (and the test) to Emacs 28 (with some minor changes to the test). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:00:40 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2021 13:00:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmCl-0003Fq-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:00:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmCf-0003F1-7k for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:00:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZBMHp08V9HYEv6zx47eGplpXHLJ+VSkeWy27D7+jvIM=; b=SBmz3qRrUCpk39OYQ3F0f/d6Z7 vRGo4wHMlRG2D2Ni4JJce90eKA6r0Ff8d3cQKvqYxJo2To8CLhBqmipKl/uz/yyYSV5A6X/1tEICF o4mM5mSOjn9cikGCF7VVMV5a4Ru7vSTeOu3BEi+Ex/vt9yY78B5fUqLkWnHCTaFGDvww=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmCX-0000zX-OM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:25 +0200 Message-Id: <87wnqwzjme.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #46312 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 46312 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 46312 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:02:17 2021 Received: (at 46312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2021 13:02:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45284 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmEL-0003Jz-1G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:02:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmEI-0003JX-Bk; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:02:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmEC-0002h3-Tn; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:02:08 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1487 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsmEB-0003Jt-FP; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:02:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:02:02 +0300 Message-Id: <83zgvs61md.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#46312: HTML+ mode vs. quotes References: <87pn5oq1hj.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <831ri34i0b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8l7zdh6.fsf@rub.de> <83o8l731yd.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qzzae2.fsf@rub.de> <83lfgb2yss.fsf@gnu.org> <87d01nz7gb.fsf@rub.de> <83blh72vlk.fsf@gnu.org> <878scbyw3s.fsf@rub.de> <87sgai76oj.fsf@gmx.net> <878s3e3qgf.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8735tlljin.fsf@gmx.net> <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46312 Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, 40844@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 43941@debbugs.gnu.org, 46312@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 46312@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , > 40844@debbugs.gnu.org, 43941@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org > Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200 > > Stephen Berman writes: > > > Upthread Eli said "some SGML/HTML expert should say if that is TRT". > > I'm no such expert so I can't make that decision. > > I'm not either, but at this point I'd rather apply the patch and then we > can see whether some SGML expert pipes up... Fine with me. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:52:54 2021 Received: (at 46312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2021 13:52:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1K-0000Z7-3H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:52:54 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:37863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn1J-0000Ym-3J; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:52:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1623678762; bh=J4RLMIqBxlAY/6GWtLhmP0okFmpopI+YxabPP3wjqLk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iWXIQWXcmcEDSFmXQdMwuo9dQ0Q/DHvYyH0QayrNjJTK6clYBr1HNN4B2T/Yogl8p Yxj4QoqpQtVCs4i68193b2G8RF2W4LKMel7IjCsxIcvkbABDzsB0Mpf12Qa7a2LMhq rWmUybT1YXZCe2KqMoKi2pA9eAMmu/L+Uujqrx6E= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from strobelfs ([94.220.126.243]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M1ps8-1luysE2VEu-002EFl; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:52:42 +0200 From: Stephen Berman To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#46312: HTML+ mode vs. quotes References: <87pn5oq1hj.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <831ri34i0b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8l7zdh6.fsf@rub.de> <83o8l731yd.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qzzae2.fsf@rub.de> <83lfgb2yss.fsf@gnu.org> <87d01nz7gb.fsf@rub.de> <83blh72vlk.fsf@gnu.org> <878scbyw3s.fsf@rub.de> <87sgai76oj.fsf@gmx.net> <878s3e3qgf.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8735tlljin.fsf@gmx.net> <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:52:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200") Message-ID: <8735tkft93.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ie/ukzIltoe1fjbA9rObJPxga2oCZxe0DUW9l7E8PilfBFM2wN6 dC/2g2pW9JHH7053QyEZkOqFcWVvDqcWMZcFkzEgqZ/1pUVagyw3ORQViNFf6rs8oA0HhNu m7OjzKR27LXM0h2I+M7kgPQFOyC/QiFM3VEz3a6r8R+QWOujHkArrrat4Kq1uqYpkXSqHOG jUk8Y1VN7ojCxXuMX0FlA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:xkoMIyWV3AY=:uh5X8c2J8bbnw/W7rAAlCl EL6wI8Dj5mbQKQc8d3xvefgyUXjoW/lB6xVKHchdPC/xi07BVT4BrlFxYfd6uTn1Spu/zag4T qF21mQyC0L25yQR3OVjHdApu1otcSKHspYMTyRbtBt9uYRAn7HGN+MF4t0+VPJ0GaTFj5xFJH Qmxqgfxf47WX9J7IHhVANXnmciLTBiaNwzG7teO/joQlw8/ry7BLplVUnRorOJ7qAAGYDr5u+ 2F3gs+PzIrAVsFLgbBYeIeYXfsxktCjDR3JM0za/FrplQvZphKj2mXtk+i1iYpNIFeDrqz8De 8iwJ6EuLcZxSaeYQp68KMHGujP0heg23MfyplfiDBTuhmSE37xfEaxi1xAwjeCg24Z6VRlmYr H6X0b62KdkwDdkTHRBNFtWn111HIrDJoM4WsUMRcLedt8VpwSK5ApakZLygPNl9ZdA6IpG+oj dmDC74WzMhIWX6DrKgIRW/YTWr6RPHukTEJyuLYylzLr/4r4ppCewS/jrXtZBE0OQrxYPvRgZ vozLNhhZINkOkjG8aCJ+2eb29Us+9EDS5027q70Y5FopIh4gjDENpDpljTq7Tcx4Z0kTdC/vB kJmn2jUkXZGMcIOnrRSiugpMHOVOFZhJiE3+c828RZGpdqag+Dkn3juK+2dYYqj5mWOhQdYEc ZpIq1WLZchAmfmWR8tAaltipFE3erebtfx851kD6Xu8ro2SQKUclKYoZtDgFZO1roskXCLMIK DwhGxIyZGPvPDbK5Gi6tVsyOdOUKYJzc1T+NVUCuZDzjqn+y9Ll70BIsLHsqIaykAl8KBzRKs nBUdLiR4Tx7OBCzaDs792oY07T6QhRCA9yIMe7qXkP1gysSfXX/aEpq9rtopSgdc5KV08FFTJ 4HGf2cV9iPbqWaumSPyIOD3nvvsGxbn2+fjpCWBN6dLicb2SVF4G6u0vPddq9zyt3tnqpleg7 Kpv6L0EU1AvH/KdTqZIXYy/P+ZlJuNFNoUB+qNne0pcpn2DY2WONXom6OK68gS9Mf1cbgs1hu rZwEbJ22Ll/gYlrmBC2zK29y883irjM1pZlUDdhTp8oM82Tgt236O7CuD7nNzhzZz5g9sLTTm GqEruLMS0qNmq2E9qUWOsafbXfnvdNoXTE6k+04AxUSKh4NKyCfYMul1Q== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46312 Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, Eli Zaretskii , 40844@debbugs.gnu.org, 43941@debbugs.gnu.org, 46312@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:00:16 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> Upthread Eli said "some SGML/HTML expert should say if that is TRT". >> I'm no such expert so I can't make that decision. > > I'm not either, but at this point I'd rather apply the patch and then we > can see whether some SGML expert pipes up... Sounds good. >> Here's the test, in case someone else wants to see if >> they can figure it out; I haven't succeeded: > > Just needs a `font-lock-ensure' after `html-mode'. :-) Then the test > fails without your patch, and passes with your patch. Ah, thanks. The ways of font lock are unfathomable to me. > So I went ahead and pushed your patch (and the test) to Emacs 28 (with > some minor changes to the test). Thanks. I noticed, unfortunately only just now, that the ert test includes the unused let-bound variable `results' which I inadvertantly left behind from the previous version, and which will probably make the byte-compiler complain. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 14 09:58:30 2021 Received: (at 46312) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2021 13:58:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn6j-0001BF-Nu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:58:29 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn6g-0001Al-U4; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:58:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5uB8KLGFgJOHbG2+sd/i1NenNDf5TxE9/2jYGL0WAc0=; b=P/oo36gVjeosZRnns3Mu6U1h25 flmrvDbxgIRJ/gSSxI8XHiRm4K5lf5XvFOlRb780l459V+uaveDpy9c5rKTzRmIAfgKekgSdByPXK WuUmIhZdyhuEnwYHq4KStMvIWcP6vbu0paLWYdBSmeWEInrz7hq5cUaccE0N5f+w+I5U=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lsn6V-0001SK-AF; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:58:17 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stephen Berman Subject: Re: bug#46312: HTML+ mode vs. quotes References: <87pn5oq1hj.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <831ri34i0b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8l7zdh6.fsf@rub.de> <83o8l731yd.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7qzzae2.fsf@rub.de> <83lfgb2yss.fsf@gnu.org> <87d01nz7gb.fsf@rub.de> <83blh72vlk.fsf@gnu.org> <878scbyw3s.fsf@rub.de> <87sgai76oj.fsf@gmx.net> <878s3e3qgf.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8735tlljin.fsf@gmx.net> <87y2bczjmn.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8735tkft93.fsf@gmx.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAMAAABg3Am1AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAM1BMVEX+/v6OkI7o6OjS 0tKfn5+tra3f399+gH5sbmxPUU9eX14/QT8wMjEcHhyAgX/AwL/////sQbtoAAAAAWJLR0QQlbIN LAAAAAd0SU1FB+UGDg06BiHQSh0AAADbSURBVEjH7VPZbsMwDNNhOZSibP//t2MdtEAfCwzYHkzY jnVQogBHZGNj419DjYepuMsQiRCZB5ZTBjAkcNCajHksQs512gErkUqWSD1XLAttSMBkXNy6CLWK IYBQmSgXDbHbObng61rxIsy7u+IrJAa94+pzZRXGaWhQpTreCd5DKQ6FEoug9kco+xAoyZGa75Ks PZpGIS04/iLAEEJJJsjqScn26sCPl7Avp6Gk6/uuZRz66nRWVY2rm8l3/oNra1Zud3/63CYtY5JN 8wj761ewsbHx2/jwt/4B4m4FbhGkPhYAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDYtMTRUMTM6 NTg6MDYrMDA6MDD0atrRAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA2LTE0VDEzOjU4OjA2KzAw OjAwhTdibQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: 75 Dollar Bill's _I Was Real_: "I Was Real" Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:58:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735tkft93.fsf@gmx.net> (Stephen Berman's message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:52:40 +0200") Message-ID: <8735tkzgy1.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stephen Berman writes: > Thanks. I noticed, unfortunately only just now, that the ert test > includes the unused let-bound variable `results' which I inadvertantly > left behind from the previous version, and which will pro [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46312 Cc: jidanni@jidanni.org, Eli Zaretskii , 40844@debbugs.gnu.org, 43941@debbugs.gnu.org, 46312@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Stephen Berman writes: > Thanks. I noticed, unfortunately only just now, that the ert test > includes the unused let-bound variable `results' which I inadvertantly > left behind from the previous version, and which will probably make the > byte-compiler complain. Yup; now removed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 22 00:24:36 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator