From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 03 15:04:55 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2021 20:04:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7OOV-0002y4-Hc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:04:55 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7OOF-0002xS-K3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:04:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7OOD-0006HI-LB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:04:39 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:41801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7OO9-0002T5-FT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:04:37 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED555C010D for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:04:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:04:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=KW3HL7ifOwEJBxAGuvLeUnIIL9 39+wTNf9JcL/qVV8w=; b=JgBhyLhn0RquXjXetpGSv+QT5tYYs6qZ/nEfSWkaAv p+JbSJxHB8wSOTmqBy6oZtkzS4yxFkkrKn7DeV+lmBOaYF7tXrLI87HdL2sueCsx ePdMHO4yUwC9PDf7l3P/nJ52QveYtOLW65GW8HEN+bA66dGdcgzzvTKyHZutLxW7 UDYiBvyXqTnlqsmpMSalkTcegYIslBFS5QQcCYzKjVAqmwV8fYOj/Z8lhgAL2qbo 4fTsOgbLppO215OLy7oMhEzzCDb5dPdEuXpRO3rd8v40PnmijtARS0rsn357KEtv UDglUBGtI8LK2e1TJUBBAcFBtDekF/BtLpT69B8+ScBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=KW3HL7 ifOwEJBxAGuvLeUnIIL939+wTNf9JcL/qVV8w=; b=OW/Odls7iqG6SF++MnM1kV I08em58txQNGhrnrg1xbUDqyLGtS0bjG5CBPgg9pfIGHil3cUsnYNqE8gkzg/eCK CpHmipVcCGuFAYZKIk8cqTPP5nx9G1i3acMs/7q/wNs+uht20O68iRCBSj/lwENi UolFzQJ6Z7BztvA+FscHp/Y6TXDcstOvJIdo5Mt4ONDnR12xYornfbmOYxAfL0R9 7lCZXfVwdzUe0h34VCcEiF9G853odp317waZq5VUjnX0+v8XPqwAwnH0eCxK1ORy hUvveG4zgtNxhElHV6K5BSdDdx53UqcTjYU8MrWOIp/D8PslWXqnnVMNziE9vFMw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgedvgddufedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkgggtgfesthhqredttd dtjeenucfhrhhomhephfhilhhiphhpucfiuhhnsghinhcuoehfghhunhgsihhnsehfrghs thhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiieeugeduuefhlefgjeehieefje ejgfeileejueefhfdthfeivefhvefgffegvdenucfkphepkeegrddvtdegrdduleefrddu tdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepfh hguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from fgunbin.local (unknown [84.204.193.106]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2144224005C for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:04:28 -0500 (EST) From: Filipp Gunbin To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 28.0.50; Inconsistent doc for syntax-propertize-function Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 23:04:26 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.27; envelope-from=fgunbin@fastmail.fm; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: C-h v syntax-propertize-function contains this text: --88--- The specified function may call `syntax-ppss' on any position before END, but if it calls `syntax-ppss' on some position and later mod [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (fgunbin[at]fastmail.fm) 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror) 1.5 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) C-h v syntax-propertize-function contains this text: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- The specified function may call `syntax-ppss' on any position before END, but if it calls `syntax-ppss' on some position and later modifies the buffer on some earlier position, then it is its responsibility to call `syntax-ppss-flush-cache' to flush the now obsolete ppss info from the cache. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- But (info "(elisp) Syntax Properties") has a different view: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- It is allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on any position before = END. However, it should not call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss-flush-cache=E2=80=99; so, = it is not allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on some position and later mo= dify the buffer at an earlier position. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Which is the right one? Thanks. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin20.2.0, NS appkit-2022.20= Version 11.1 (Build 20C69)) of 2021-02-03 built on fgunbin.local Repository revision: 20e48b6fd6cade60e468140a66127d326abfb8ff Repository branch: master System Description: macOS 11.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 03:34:26 2021 Received: (at 46274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 08:34:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7a5q-000536-Dn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 03:34:26 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7a5p-00052i-5S for 46274@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 03:34:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/yrTKP1pLw+97IfKQdKakxMhTSeNx3erRUFVsuYEU0A=; b=VGlbojocaz24JZeGwE2DfngcFU gqCYKw9ADagJGasR2/MwG4lN8O6B8Qs9ZkZzpPgoZP/6rLPFX8dYu7TKnwp5xrEeW3pMHTju6lVzz agQ8vflMQAOUqlkj+nVVf/LUcrn85fDe14EeFijPDuFMk0JByy8A800mLhCAZiGtLL7U=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7a5d-0004lG-37; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:34:18 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: 46274@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#46274: 28.0.50; Inconsistent doc for syntax-propertize-function References: X-Now-Playing: Pailhead's _Trait_: "I Will Refuse" Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:34:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Filipp Gunbin's message of "Wed, 03 Feb 2021 23:04:26 +0300") Message-ID: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Filipp Gunbin writes: > C-h v syntax-propertize-function contains this text: > > The specified function may call `syntax-ppss' on any position > before END, but if it calls `syntax-ppss' on some > position and later modifi [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46274 Cc: Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Filipp Gunbin writes: > C-h v syntax-propertize-function contains this text: > > The specified function may call `syntax-ppss' on any position > before END, but if it calls `syntax-ppss' on some > position and later modifies the buffer on some earlier position, > then it is its responsibility to call `syntax-ppss-flush-cache' to flush > the now obsolete ppss info from the cache. > > But (info "(elisp) Syntax Properties") has a different view: > > It is allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on any position befor= e END. > However, it should not call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss-flush-cache=E2=80=99; so= , it is not > allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on some position and later = modify the > buffer at an earlier position. > > Which is the right one? Good question. Stefan M added to the CCs. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 11:23:29 2021 Received: (at 46274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 16:23:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hPl-0006FG-AL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:29 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:20788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7hPh-0006F2-Qk for 46274@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:28 -0500 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57066100707; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:23:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1733910005D; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:23:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1612455798; bh=JNF/heVsI5RcZ/rJbu46j4oqsBIQ3Wxh1SNxeRnAt4k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jcCJdieYBXuwz0MY5MIQjYeDqyUk/tZjl4K63+1IMTfoy2gsdchpzGCuiLqApCmjo dpli08PnVZw8c5WPp6iPy/OCfqlD9gCu1/YQ4Rn1hV27U1qD9/DUAqxA+gY8sYYlcp Q5LxlxDoe2ttlcdg7XU9MzX80kWAGfNnnTtXuSPeFqAgRMX7Yph7/+3yPz3R1H++af NUKAdFMialj7rTX7CKMEC9LilkQkTB3v25lZipudkVSomcR45O3JNmPrzR4OO90Y1W ZW+zb0xaiI+fqGBrHke0Y6RjuPKCxjytG0SCjPSg/2DPiFuyDi3wnViiyQetVshEfz dcrt8c5kq//+A== Received: from alfajor (76-10-182-85.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.182.85]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A674D1204AE; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:23:17 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#46274: 28.0.50; Inconsistent doc for syntax-propertize-function Message-ID: References: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:34:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.024 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46274 Cc: 46274@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) >> C-h v syntax-propertize-function contains this text: >> >> The specified function may call `syntax-ppss' on any position >> before END, but if it calls `syntax-ppss' on some >> position and later modifies the buffer on some earlier position, >> then it is its responsibility to call `syntax-ppss-flush-cache' to flush >> the now obsolete ppss info from the cache. >> >> But (info "(elisp) Syntax Properties") has a different view: >> >> It is allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on any position befo= re END. >> However, it should not call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss-flush-cache=E2=80=99; s= o, it is not >> allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on some position and later= modify the >> buffer at an earlier position. >> >> Which is the right one? > > Good question. Stefan M added to the CCs. Great question. Thanks for asking. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 15:34:48 2021 Received: (at 46274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 20:34:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42363 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7lKu-0003u0-GI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:34:48 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:54458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7lKs-0003tn-BI for 46274@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:34:43 -0500 Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 72B9A80BB9; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:34:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE90F807E9; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:34:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1612470874; bh=iFZBJn76RvoHdODQphhTRIFUh8NLzrQ6DasY1/Cj7yo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=X2e3uG7WZEU8DSS+GALRmdIeDZsiuoezGHcOkVNC9x3vECxQXPLUBW08BmF7/t9g7 evo2nNxH8Q1Wh9pWj6dtEHGqadjFdcGzPZbiVbkqBwthP4ZdP1ephd90rHv5NI6pNK LkIanLwVvEOLiB78QkRfwnp6l+kXc47wHSZ58JIMvD5VT7rAnl2eBBpd4KEVn31UZT drEXhn2DHJoaH+vI4qvGH6WmZ2uH97fzCm1dE0QUFbBb7XsJvEEB22i1OuK8zmxBE5 B99W9pcwyw+TwqJHQykDTWU1WCgU8Kjg89blIrAQAms5tDtOASzkjY7gcyc69rr17E G2xQ2Bx5kkJiA== Received: from alfajor (76-10-182-85.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.182.85]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8512B120286; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:34:34 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#46274: 28.0.50; Inconsistent doc for syntax-propertize-function Message-ID: References: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:34:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:34:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.012 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46274 Cc: 46274@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) >> C-h v syntax-propertize-function contains this text: >> >> The specified function may call `syntax-ppss' on any position >> before END, but if it calls `syntax-ppss' on some >> position and later modifies the buffer on some earlier position, >> then it is its responsibility to call `syntax-ppss-flush-cache' to flush >> the now obsolete ppss info from the cache. >> >> But (info "(elisp) Syntax Properties") has a different view: >> >> It is allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on any position befo= re END. >> However, it should not call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss-flush-cache=E2=80=99; s= o, it is not >> allowed to call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss=E2=80=99 on some position and later= modify the >> buffer at an earlier position. >> >> Which is the right one? > > Good question. Stefan M added to the CCs. I think the docstring is the one that's more right (especially since there is a fair number of syntax-propertize-functions which do call =E2=80=98syntax-ppss-flush-cache=E2=80=99). Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 05 03:38:24 2021 Received: (at 46274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2021 08:38:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7wdE-0004ml-DQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:38:24 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38262) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7wdB-0004mS-NP for 46274@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:38:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ijxPaE5GRZKdrvfpiwduYyCDHjmMgztmGsOo7OsUkEA=; b=Q16zgAUTZP72PP/3KChzBSHcxw 76V1IgIg10zzPbUhwR9VguEAiJF0p+h30iCO8bg4vHsj/9pUYfb2XumWoZ7+3zFVTCpFFbWxn5Cwr Eoqver9aAchiMym74/vELdOl6+C14ZXH/JdO5H8Aj8gNv6vSxRLzdqxp+Tu6rqYQz/Ug=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7wd1-0000Tt-UJ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:38:14 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#46274: 28.0.50; Inconsistent doc for syntax-propertize-function References: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEVbJYRgJoR8UYKM fm5ROkbY1sf///8tWHUmAAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+UCBQgeLC/JgUcAAAGqSURBVDjL bZRdloMgDIVh2nkH7bxXOzsgvncOuAKa/W9lkhtQ+5NzaCUfNzei6Nwh/P4fjnkXkQ3O+xjdW0gy duDDMa9EgXev5aIzBRYEW7eHKGaNq4xBxoTZ5BVgHodhGuIwhRjnWd1da/lwC5oxD+fjlgzOdw/r xeILKQMoFOb5djP7UW12xSCWszYwDdNTqT2C+wD6dnxQ+OCDfwLSseSwryYT3/IevwrG9zwVgCwX r6HgnBrIG88AJ81kTK2MzPMVpSj1lQQutf9UkVJaayvRRUEVKdHCdOggZyjGnIiZbCVXU6rHWVZU XlAoG2jmJWVmtiJcCSvuAi7SnZVSwI9SpEmU2jxKWXh5aLcpAJAkagP8QNPN/ADSAxd3eWNOopA8 bm6Fh/St4KKAKTfzouYEQK2Zst1HyXd5qCNAk/T2gseWJFaTDHeT6muouyv7KAMKq6WlvmsDNSe5 D4afbokB+SHuUYpu+w9KMWErLSrAaHUSrbxLDCxVkTxGXqu52BOUa4CV69LtTUFLURsBNfEOhtmi /+M4f/qWtO+JnlXfjoN+UmTYmfoHNuavkJlx2q0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDIt MDVUMDg6MzA6NDQrMDA6MDCmvUZQAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTAyLTA1VDA4OjMw OjQ0KzAwOjAw1+D+7AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Shirley & Dolly Collins's _Harking Back_: "Poor Murdered Woman" Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:38:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:16 -0500") Message-ID: <87h7mqnc3x.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Good question. Stefan M added to the CCs. > > Great question. Thanks for asking. You're welcome, I'm sure. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46274 Cc: 46274@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> Good question. Stefan M added to the CCs. > > Great question. Thanks for asking. You're welcome, I'm sure. Stefan Monnier writes: > I think the docstring is the one that's more right (especially since > there is a fair number of syntax-propertize-functions which do call > =E2=80=98syntax-ppss-flush-cache=E2=80=99). OK, I've now updated the manual in Emacs 28 (by just copying the bit from the doc string and tweaking it slightly). --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 05 03:38:34 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2021 08:38:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7wdO-0004n8-Ke for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:38:34 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7wdM-0004mv-7o for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 03:38:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2RHnqLKJ0QIEaw4d54eTx1VRjiF6XSJPYfnf+z45/Qk=; b=iJyUfZF3qY/4f/iwSN8kVdd5As Fb5WrAwgt9bClhttnW9XpWH31j/j410Oo/zqBF82X2CcYdSq5Yx0O1ifTGC2SRlm6sNZq0rGoER3E OeqP35zuIjjCmbox49Wx4zoy0DETml90h0xAO6zV5D836dnKHvMFfdFc67nvfKc3nrIk=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7wdE-0000U0-Af for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:38:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:38:23 +0100 Message-Id: <87ft2anc3k.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #46274 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 46274 fixed close 46274 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 46274 fixed close 46274 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 05 09:59:43 2021 Received: (at 46274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2021 14:59:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l82aE-0004Dr-T9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:59:43 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:43659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l82aD-0004Dd-06 for 46274@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:59:41 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF735C0196; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:59:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:59:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=xuUx1m4dISkxOnFiLqjKzLO7+2 TYkpiqVPsOvS5HOXU=; b=ZXClf+UwCfL9Hxidfzz/9wneF7wfVdNSnZR81bfpP/ JXtrTL4P40lAMkWKshqbv0HirT0T7kkj4gEK3ItOpkPdzFh+OfjL0rAPCrGPT2u2 0SJGUl58N5qOLgKogLxinygppnxnyx46OpHtxKNJPpqrgvtBq/oC/CipSwTxhHvz iRuZ2Zt6ChUSHykyGevfh2g6q4kVwW9ZVco8cLTijgcQ3QQk3/AZwQKIXEJjrWf0 ieFgX+NwlpDr6+6CkNkKbNoeB+2BvVKiCpWN607Jmk7UbTXDlzclN/9ffpqMyEON nGLcJ53ZCTtXLnO0JY7mLqjQ+Gzel+yYLJn0UNYFwcCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=xuUx1m 4dISkxOnFiLqjKzLO7+2TYkpiqVPsOvS5HOXU=; b=QAQ1BHiPL6MplgPGrDWLZM cuqiWrFDxuM2zQUPEisJVZYKBgaW9ZdXLQvMPVQOWlhFR1PTNCQuNjhUBPahxO1a BENJl3rGt16WxzhI4SVlV9WVf/FJNoNSfQwM6HpsW3EIM+giE062ClyGZMcYYR0W zCjg2VuveLBc8LtaS06axESrKlOgcRE6wiepvhdCcefqw9KHc6svKgktjOfvWAts GbCBsfg+Xy10q7UHnqKRYdr4Xkh18kOC5wJ0DiqsKcf8U+RkAyWZ9mrpH+wCp+Al E6MED2TGHc2h8XHLnkqMB5EiHYIDdv6IwXpIAeWuOWLubiEa6PNj+LFURoXJgHug == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeeigdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffujghffgffkfggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomhephfhilhhiphhp ucfiuhhnsghinhcuoehfghhunhgsihhnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedvveekffdvueevhfdutdejheekvdeufeevtedttdevuddugfeiffeiveei vefhtdenucfkphepkeegrddvtdegrdduleefrddutdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepfhhguhhnsghinhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhl rdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from fgunbin.local (unknown [84.204.193.106]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 89C3724005E; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 09:59:33 -0500 (EST) From: Filipp Gunbin To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#46274: 28.0.50; Inconsistent doc for syntax-propertize-function In-Reply-To: <87h7mqnc3x.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:38:10 +0100") References: <871rdwgrjw.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mqnc3x.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 17:59:32 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46274 Cc: 46274@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Thank you both! Filipp From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:53:23 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator