GNU bug report logs - #46256
[feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run from build tree

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:12:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #511 received at 46256 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
Cc: 46256 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com, pipcet <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#46256: [feature/native-comp] AOT eln files ignored if run
 from build tree
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 18:36:19 +0200
> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl <at> sdf.org>
> Cc: pipcet <at> gmail.com, 46256 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton <at> gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 13:58:31 +0000
> 
> > I think it _is_ the case, but the problem might be that the refcount
> > is not zero, and therefore the shared library is not actually unloaded
> > and unmapped.  (I say "might be" because I still don't see the
> > scenario where this could happen, and I'm not sure if it does happen
> > the solution should be as suggested -- it could be that it's better to
> > not load the .eln the second time, i.e. make 'load' behave like
> > 'require').
> 
> That was my understanding (as I don't see why dlclose should fail) but
> reading the man page:
> 
> "On success, dlclose() returns 0; on error, it returns a nonzero value."
> 
> So my understanding now is that it can fail.  Am I wrong?

I don't know.  Posix says no errors are defined for dlclose, so maybe
look at the glibc sources to see what happens on GNU/Linux?




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 130 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.