From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:29:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46233: 28.0.50; python-mode font-lock assignment issues Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 12:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 46233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 46233@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161218143031098 (code B ref -1); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 12:11:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 12:10:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Y2I-00085V-5T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:10:30 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:48748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6XnZ-0007dV-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:55:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6XnZ-0003x2-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:55:17 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::231]:40563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6XnX-0004KZ-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:55:16 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id s18so19208869ljg.7 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 03:55:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rewY5nxNuJvaFMXyre3+t1r+ecY5m/47WyEVEh8lLzQ=; b=WGYA3XrU+TI9EMBDeMJ7l/Sxsrk3DDwyqq+zTYjRbjidiau5hJwu8AcVpcyA1SD67z WXGJFGv+2k2NH2egdYSHjng1zWSfvr4eb46k+IsoWNZmptDIn3NwtoWClhqda+3rAB5e 9uEXck60NReO5NRsMDYOg6pOqPqIo8+DUefgQT8eOzmPH1b3oRW+Nq0If7EYoltF3dIv i4MumsAmv7M/GbqbNlcQdIw4NFlF3MHk+oqPAwNMM0Mm4WJNRtOvC5+mLzs8N0IVFka0 v1/BM2Px+/qrOFYVOKnhc7+9sJmjpfSVosZU3S+Y6u/YvdlKM8fznEUM0I0wk8pc04Yt z31g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rewY5nxNuJvaFMXyre3+t1r+ecY5m/47WyEVEh8lLzQ=; b=KAjPQrzP4R20e79lG8YfOqgKdn1ytE/XDBoA44RvsNBONbee8cQfGs+KE9he8kR+Nn p1dP1FxVTzqZL5TYcVDPOMgposa+WVUeNeAY/fB31Na0or4Tv6BDpqL88ypDTpVhkFLV Sw2/WXSOMyOFLZ5iwk35BmQwYKugaEmNjW7otq1BwkYUuBBnfDAqPp8hOJ3y+TGSY89z NPPCcaQr6NI9u+XgduNWh+LUTJDx1cYUb4yUwA7SqXC7lFZWvBdLk1TU93qNClc0MR1j gl1j2BZtIp2hPNrlpLFpLo2gP7ZYWVLoDTtEPkZ4wBXmwd5UGA4maV3ufb4Bt4xnQm0x yPZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IoLkTi5N/xcHQMdU+QVU9azR/WNFojIlUIi6vak++o4ExkBi+ feaZQ/4YL9wMNLaGSHW4I9gcMgNuJ+wvpaf18Yc31d9Kbni+e4xq X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywcCJk8IBKrnUVrVf1yfEr9a6nkWvip2pHLU9L2/nU4Te52s5Om9Kg0r+Uj59LPnHGJFWdtOp9zr7DT0LQ78Q= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8890:: with SMTP id k16mr9864139lji.229.1612180512882; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 03:55:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:55:01 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8c6ab05ba45067c" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::231; envelope-from=mykhailopanarin@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x231.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:10:29 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --000000000000c8c6ab05ba45067c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" emacs-version: "GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.24, cairo version 1.17.4) of 2021-01-22" Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incorrectly. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a python file with contents > def foo(bar: int) -> str: > spam = bar > eggs = f'lkjahsd {spam}' > return eggs > > > def foo2(bar: int): > spam = bar > eggs = f'lkjahsd {spam}' > return eggs > > > def foo3(bar): > spam = bar > eggs = f'lkjahsd {spam}' > return eggs 2. Open the file with emacs -Q You will see that variables `spam` and `bar` are highlighted differently in all 3 cases. `spam`: not highlighted at all in cases `foo` and `foo2` `bar`: not highlighted correctly in cases `foo` and `foo3` Best regards, Mykhailo --000000000000c8c6ab05ba45067c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
emacs-version: "GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc= -linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.24, cairo version 1.17.4)
=C2=A0of 2021-01= -22"

Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incor= rectly.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a python file with contents
= > def foo(bar: int) -> str:
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 spam =3D bar
>= ; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 eggs =3D f'lkjahsd {spam}'
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 re= turn eggs
>
>
> def foo2(bar: int):
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0= spam =3D bar
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 eggs =3D f'lkjahsd {spam}'
&= gt; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 return eggs
>
>
> def foo3(bar):
>= ; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 spam =3D bar
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 eggs =3D f'lkjahsd {= spam}'
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 return eggs

2. Open the file with = emacs -Q

You will see that variables `spam` and `bar` are highlighte= d differently
in all 3 cases.
`spam`:
=C2=A0 not highlighted at al= l in cases `foo` and `foo2`
`bar`:
=C2=A0 not highlighted correctly i= n cases `foo` and `foo3`

Best regards,
Mykhailo=
--000000000000c8c6ab05ba45067c-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:29:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46233: 28.0.50; python-mode font-lock assignment issues Resent-From: Andrii Kolomoiets Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Cc: 46233@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46233.161218452711839 (code B ref 46233); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 46233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 13:02:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59354 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6YqD-00034q-SB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 08:02:07 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com ([209.85.208.178]:42417) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6YqB-00034L-5i for 46233@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 08:02:04 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id c18so19456084ljd.9 for <46233@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:02:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KWBdJLl9HjsAWX9aYQZE61CA6pIpoCwPSpz3uCsmYhs=; b=XPkc6tmzrZooqjBxHm7JcudWyVVVDnXanZKURFQmbKVMunqnsI1xbZm+3wRfOyBnqR A/7+4aXVPmHaWQNLDanVXc3qBnEX+oUdEzlZF+LAwvYpcyN+x7XgRSwaJP4Ipsy9+Pv3 k1WpAQDPwUAJnaOuXKJvPGHB0UsKEfxs63shhejbeXTVqhjoCfHpWZZpkNZR0w7nhWWQ lTnAUI5lvzvZaipyJ8u7DBj7zCU9m+0ULkWQwBHNFKFkn7AjdiULH3ukPKgtLa45c/Jw RtopvPQwXKBAO0b/AlR+HRCqnPbuwK0g7ax1vPRA50dMkaQN6rz/S4jc3lp0mpDNfcKF HAHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KWBdJLl9HjsAWX9aYQZE61CA6pIpoCwPSpz3uCsmYhs=; b=ui/dtj0RSmVBDEpAxFFtJnHAOwx+heG4jzdVraFSGiltkfmIZOXNnR08obnHhtYhnV GDkBIIFDq/gdUvjHuGn1Umk7Skl8QVW49YpW7eBh10KNOBvm55SBJ3MXQSYwa2JRg2x4 EuUUw/RttVJiirxAGFhZEhAhEhs7XutFPfIGIuKK4hAe3lAKqvIvNbfUEFL8FD94DZJf 89NXSahYyvtTxQbPK+5/H96sOz0/rzC2cnR8zG/k+fO3j/oNSVdHNWktJj16AQNMyd5K 8le0togeHULrspImlhxkT1Pt2/5rv4sMimRaPY4QOMIs7or/m4TuRLAOISM9k8uncNsK +A2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532INxuTmJEVerwOIoL0r9viiddwZEuvkH2SJLItE0PLUlvJQVJJ lqTRVEi5OU+SkxRANUdvQacl1hhn6Ao= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTLXxLVsnb7lDR4WU670rEJ4u5JEweUf7xAqu09jAcCfTaYiMusHVJ7JGZl0bOufoBmMhhOw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7317:: with SMTP id o23mr4145300ljc.338.1612184516412; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:01:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from muffinmac ([91.206.110.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12sm1981992ljm.124.2021.02.01.05.01.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:01:55 -0800 (PST) From: Andrii Kolomoiets References: Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:01:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?="'s message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:55:01 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 3.6 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= writes: > Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incorrectly. Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45679 Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [91.206.110.197 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andreyk.mad[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= writes: > Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incorrectly. Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45679 Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [91.206.110.197 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andreyk.mad[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager =D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB =D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8= =D0=BD writes: > Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incorrectly. Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D45679 From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:29:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46233: 28.0.50; python-mode font-lock assignment issues Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andrii Kolomoiets Cc: 46233@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46233.161219171625384 (code B ref 46233); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 46233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 15:01:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aiB-0006bI-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:01:56 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com ([209.85.167.52]:37756) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Z2d-0003OL-7O for 46233@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 08:14:57 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id i187so22659571lfd.4 for <46233@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:14:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4yWZODwJY4VQK8Pc6VTj+rgj2g3fr42XiYJq7G8rjWM=; b=gTgm8bFEimUGrLPW26AQh248cS40WfjE6wpsDqUe3JRG1wDm7WxnGKGA79HqaLpfwO xRYwjyVUj3Clc2cPg/CFtz8VB5tFj5b239Lze7/SaZ+g5JfZj5jRtNpvvhRPsKjFa/Ft 5OV2RIsRBSeVMwLvPw/UqGgXewePRKwisdicbgeqPLFiak0V/5w0yVozZuWFUztUW/S7 4BU8Do7M7qblomke8ZvNAt8wYmfXwDz2EwcqTqXyGRCfT80tiKQZCnSroADpvJ220zdV nWs0WBNX7ljgX5d7gmq6Dv9b1g9bgjAZngqeysT920J+8FbN9LbdZz1oztaLnrUUpOFR AkZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4yWZODwJY4VQK8Pc6VTj+rgj2g3fr42XiYJq7G8rjWM=; b=qwpWiCW3FfuM3dIG32ePKEnY2x6lybRHwyaxKi/uRocipJty47rY9n/MN0MPfUeigK cD7tJY7UfRiNp0EmNRDkgZf5n+sluF2vjAgnsFKqtKBH5h7XQJQGTvIhrTbqIG99wfQu hcFVKYPHl/DnSLBaRBapxg8eap/OeHnwv3raZtR6rArhhxLPEnA2d1nBN06AXQInzunf owEckukX1xqCG3lLvO53vrjYSz2uuAyQNvwfftJS506PXaDkdahvTiqbXk+3RJpqYDY/ QrJmLglE69VaJstqTHF7P5N5Hai8agj+l4pP0R3h2CmNyFb94fJStmdoGLMcRlQzUhW9 GGWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BDUooq/Dr8st0E5XTTI2+2DtzRFVORWkDI37DT4FvuWivxhwd U6RNyJzuFaoKxl0pMSrn41K7nq8AupXrRiZwzj8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzH6kmHNss+kdkajxqqSSTOeWw5CG/7OlUw2VM1dEHrLzUeRBg9sQDp6dMrNkntoIpkeMYl9zLCcW/47b8hoRI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:754:: with SMTP id c20mr1422596lfs.141.1612185289255; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:14:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:14:38 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a6dfd05ba46239a" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:01:54 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000007a6dfd05ba46239a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? It certainly can be, yes. Fixing one will probably fix the other. But I decided not to guess and file this report as well, as the described case is a bit different =D0=BF=D0=BD, 1 =D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=82. 2021 =D0=BE 15:01 Andrii Kolomoiets =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5: > =D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB =D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8= =D0=BD writes: > > > Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incorrectly. > > Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D45679 > --0000000000007a6dfd05ba46239a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679?

It cert= ainly can be, yes.
Fixing one will probably fix the other. But I = decided not to guess and file this report as well, as the described case is= a bit different=C2=A0

=D0=BF=D0=BD, 1 =D0=BB=D1=8E=D1=82. 2021 =D0= =BE 15:01 Andrii Kolomoiets <an= dreyk.mad@gmail.com> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5:
=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB = =D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD <mykhailopanarin@gmail.com> writes= :

> Sometimes assignments are not fontified or fontified incorrectly.

Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679?
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug= =3D45679
--0000000000007a6dfd05ba46239a-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:29:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46233: 28.0.50; python-mode font-lock assignment issues Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Cc: 46233@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46233.161219171925396 (code B ref 46233); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:03 +0000 Received: (at 46233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 15:01:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aiC-0006bN-Fl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:01:58 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f41.google.com ([209.85.167.41]:33142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ZmS-0004d4-Om for 46233@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:02:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b2so22904970lfq.0 for <46233@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:02:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=mtIrd2brmBIFYdZVI4vC2tRkVDjVhBgrIuUbD8Zz+ko=; b=R5TUAAyp4TFU7gbyWDoanZq7DXY1r8y6YVWU/Sbym8aqEA3YVRa400DOXJuyL5gGkx h7vFmCe/kCVJJazYb2fv2ErLrju/O+x1zqRi4vmpLa1ZOnnYleBid6+DAiv0gERwsQ+Z RrFXxohd/Vn7HCF8uLJrsrBso3vsSp6mDtFGIZSN/APZpppeY/4fxx8ufjEuB0jVdpmd 0OC0BkcoEJ2GYexJH/EUgB/9lZV80NkbbCyNqCO4bEEuK0qFJC2x28b40Gwn5/fBkNqH mlchSMp+MGA8154Ac7saUMjFJWnlU0TPvDOc+JH6aRQP6RNFmarTluOTX/nsn5S1+FU5 5uUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=mtIrd2brmBIFYdZVI4vC2tRkVDjVhBgrIuUbD8Zz+ko=; b=hgHmT4YPVw12yCUWVcrmfpT6OOQREj9VSjMS1e2UGHSXdb/S52LP2pZV5i+sjRHv2L bKKegTW+3qx+lkQ0E6xC7vSKwX9bmIMzIqqLsj1u9i/+695aI3PemjzE75avQyXKFPYB uUp+TtizP8yZwjriuwvtvlYSSRkZo/BDcc+6bT5yCwkZuzeOZyrnB/PghWFpjlog8Dwl 44PG3ReXIAbtY0QMkWA3CSAd90M/18peZbJNwQawGJPNX1QCBIQcf4P1jIfns55q3w7z Jv6Q6waB/JJbVzs9StP6rF/8JMfinX3OfNQqSE1vKvdOP1oLKrtp/pFLrNQe2UxLKSLr fZ6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vr4pTlThiQxTU+t4OtM2cCgM/q0wgHBIKjroSDVknk4hv3PzF sXtJlD94SF3gmUrKVr+eg7EbuTv9plC3rMPiOwkSsE1md3BtdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9s5bN0aAgqks1hJl4aMfAqYqAu6HYk8HknRf1fJzLnCD0Yr4Jeyr9idCtfRR6LK/sD/EBZu9aRbqWaoFYnBk= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c7ce:: with SMTP id x197mr8326185lff.273.1612188130128; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:02:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:01:59 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ceb7ad05ba46ccd6" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? It certainly can be, yes. Fixing one will probably fix the other. But I decided not to guess and file this report as well, as the described case is a bit different Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.167.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.167.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mykhailopanarin[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:01:54 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --000000000000ceb7ad05ba46ccd6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? It certainly can be, yes. Fixing one will probably fix the other. But I decided not to guess and file this report as well, as the described case is a bit different --000000000000ceb7ad05ba46ccd6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> I= s this the same bug as in Bug#45679?
=
It certainly can be, yes.
Fixing one will probably fix the ot= her. But I decided not to guess and file this report as well, as the descri= bed case is a bit different=C2=A0
--000000000000ceb7ad05ba46ccd6-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:29:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46233: 28.0.50; python-mode font-lock assignment issues Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 46233@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46233.161219172025403 (code B ref 46233); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:02:03 +0000 Received: (at 46233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 15:02:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aiF-0006bZ-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:02:00 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:35402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6a1s-00053v-V1 for 46233@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:18:15 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u25so22918850lfc.2 for <46233@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:18:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ouYo5mT8NLoDfLi+MyD2OJlcQYw8GQgrWjGPnbtar+E=; b=WONLhGAotc/3Iq0NajjInUTz8kcJP4qrRbgbHpO+pwSrMUw1R9+lnqot+F2/25EgbD OfV+Xsc1kza5r3ZLwIsJiJoDEpUWm8Ari6wvsQ2pU+QGrziZ8aLh6/B1xzFtQpnocW8j 4byVsmeOppx/RnveXFVtCc8Y9PcjbdIPQ7BtjIbZ1iwdYukdGj9bSqcKyRNP2DFbRsNT sU5q/BWq+lvzXEDlddoeT+ek8ILLYfVhQBGJNXOeDbfugNBM5Pa1vhfF2MRZyGEaxv8h +fb8dEfwcLaZKVqem7HebJxjcV71zHl3p0J+htuBDN3+8n4kje5E6KCWROFpuCqbvdIX MrJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ouYo5mT8NLoDfLi+MyD2OJlcQYw8GQgrWjGPnbtar+E=; b=ekityGWu64NdI6nYxYojYsFm3DfmJqPRbSNJK1Ql/Qa0JofGRnkWPeuPZSBV/kDGaN Jb04iorQOI4T9895hWCcB/XJFYesczA+W2X411UbQoVJqRE2pRPm+4zMoxAmlN/QF4ho SZdrRzNOCvDQgi0ahZkmL6JHEmxhl9djtoIoTK4jAhL80OKc0mmtbrPMNRkPN67ZwU40 jy00sG3RqeSMGyLAy+6WT+SOXtm5RI1VkGH/ANtOPwwKp2PIOmDoc8cHVdpPlQurV8fS j3ug4GYzeck4zosSj/IBcTUnW1buX7q9b+8s00GGnDSouuYLjR6w+riCVgU2UPH3pkM9 zfeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oMstxR9LnTeGX+VuLbQrKXNVPlFuf+PBZEK7luoBz7gErjbi/ Q5FxAaI65VCNaNzL8Pot8eYou7mR5HnSZWf0oBmw1W8aF2Xo6LIf X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxI0u9vg6rznc32yzifAp0hSvzZfnUd1+5m9YrKpbIs5Dom0Lni5LLEMYIR7z6jiprzLn2KBc4rzZACybJaLmQ= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5e84:: with SMTP id b4mr9113990lfq.73.1612189086432; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:18:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:17:55 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cec13905ba47053c" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:01:54 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --000000000000cec13905ba47053c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679? It certainly can be, yes. Fixing one will probably fix the other. But I decided not to guess and file this report as well, as the described case is a bit different > --000000000000cec13905ba47053c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Is this the same bug as in Bug#45679?

It certainly can be,= yes.
Fixing one will probably fix the other. But I decided not to guess= and file this report as well, as the described case is a bit different=C2= =A0
--000000000000cec13905ba47053c-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:29:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46233: 28.0.50; python-mode font-lock assignment issues Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= Cc: 46233@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46233.165521419711187 (code B ref 46233); Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 46233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2022 13:43:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o16pB-0002uM-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:43:17 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o16pA-0002u6-4R for 46233@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:43:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=O3WQgJbeF6GYf/g1N65htYYXvFgkjTgTqw6bHpwKTXc=; b=H0eDqT0XeIpW6VoKVdHL4B3RPR Fbw0/yKAZrADVXad9c76cDmTAbgpnInjDEg2fxeCaNyj1aYJIEVXWbO490NZfQ5I5s0Q599VnEoPU lGunwidVkIl9AnjQAW0WThL5vr0Gnd0NHRnQwI9p6FVgcZ3C3xgQ3osaY0/mcGqbjhPk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o16p1-000700-NG; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:43:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: X-Now-Playing: Bill Nelson's _From Brussels With Love (1)_: "The Shadow Garden" Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:43:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?="'s message of "Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:55:01 +0200") Message-ID: <87czfbl5sl.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=BD?= writes: > 2. Open the file with emacs -Q > > You will see that variables `spam` and `bar` are highlighted differently > in all 3 cases. > `spam`: > not highlighted at all in cases `foo` and `foo2` > `bar`: > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) =D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=85=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB =D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8= =D0=BD writes: > 2. Open the file with emacs -Q > > You will see that variables `spam` and `bar` are highlighted differently > in all 3 cases. > `spam`: > not highlighted at all in cases `foo` and `foo2` > `bar`: > not highlighted correctly in cases `foo` and `foo3` (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) I can reproduce this in Emacs 28, but not in Emacs 29, so it seems like this has been fixed in the time since this was reported, and I'm therefore closing this bug report. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 14 09:43:22 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2022 13:43:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o16pG-0002ug-MJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:43:22 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o16pF-0002uF-Dz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:43:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jVx2n8x8sMufkL852E015tPyQmQRfBCe4Qo+NfodwvA=; b=M0CUc5xaWF1gpdsHEbBbho5/q2 AduxKVG/2r8mzonKGTsdjUn19bdm+sVqrjTlH/MEFHL+tZL8+0I49J/cnOhsoLn6SgrtOiDAPnSl/ USMB2bEnhgR3CU31e6nvBpBxyUZ+PIG3mtVVJJaSBz/ieBfBgEkCp0R2mulP9Ap7tt/A=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o16p7-000708-LG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:43:15 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:43:12 +0200 Message-Id: <87bkuvl5sf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #46233 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 46233 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 46233 29.1 quit