GNU bug report logs - #46215
[PATCH] Add yadm

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 46215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ellis Kenyő <me <at> elken.dev>
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
Cc: 46215 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add yadm
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:06:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I understand that, the question was how are they handled if they're installed after yadm? Would yadm be rebuilt with the new inputs?

On 1 Feb 2021, 08:14, at 08:14, Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> wrote:
>Am Montag, den 01.02.2021, 03:44 +0000 schrieb Ellis Kenyő:
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> I understand what to do, I just wasn't sure how dependencies
>> installed later would be handled. Some are optional and if they don't
>> exist yadm just carries on, but some are required.
>>
>> Would the optional ones still be handled?
>Guix' policy is to include as many optional dependencies as possible,
>up to a reasonable limit in closure size.  In this case, that's
>hopefully all of them.
>
>Regards,
>Leo

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.