From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:23:43 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#46168 <46168@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#46168 <46168@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: terminal-window-size breaks with ssh Reply-To: bug#46168 <46168@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:23:43 +0000 retitle 46168 terminal-window-size breaks with ssh reassign 46168 guix submitter 46168 raingloom severity 46168 important tag 46168 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 29 01:13:48 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2021 06:13:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5N2S-0007Jk-4b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:13:48 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:56768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5N2P-0007Jb-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:13:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5N2P-0005dK-CI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:13:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:33244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5N2N-0000Wr-Bs for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:13:44 -0500 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DRn8Z3KZJzDsDx for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:13:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1611900814; bh=PMwztmFTyYI5Mi2+5hs01VIDlerTTMm/5hhxwWU/IFs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=jECBXsbkWKrCtLK8cjc0bnrV35d9DiVd92eE5Qp2+yDWJKIbG+I1zZ4zqItjBoWKZ 2MLALITVsxrn4ms6l4vjW64S6SvF5991NDLc2t8o+e7wxAQOBbq0QRXA2zXzBlAFPH 6F4WQ3/6FT389q1OxcHjoNKs2mhTRFdtjMn9LyJg= X-Riseup-User-ID: 6C170EF5B211AF2A07A3B50DE4E4C9761F1A884CFA4405ADEAFFB5804E03E179 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DRn8Y5QcKz5wF0 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:13:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:09:34 +0100 From: raingloom To: Guix Bugs Subject: terminal-window-size breaks with ssh Message-ID: <20210127230934.1be87ddb@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=raingloom@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.34, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Try running `ssh example.com guix pull` or something else that uses progress bars. You'll get an "Inappropriate ioctl for device" instead of Guix simply doing the sensible thing: disabling progress bars. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 07:49:48 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 12:49:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7e4y-0004qs-FH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:49:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7e4w-0004qe-2J for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:49:46 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7e4q-0001zs-RE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:49:40 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=54956 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7e4q-0002gh-AM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:49:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:49:39 +0100 Message-Id: <87y2g46lr0.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #46168 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) severity 46168 important quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 07:55:43 2021 Received: (at 46168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 12:55:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7eAh-00051F-4y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:55:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7eAf-000513-9h for 46168@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:55:42 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7eAZ-0004Xx-Iy; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:55:35 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=54984 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7eA5-00035g-NO; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:55:11 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: raingloom Subject: Re: bug#46168: terminal-window-size breaks with ssh References: <20210127230934.1be87ddb@riseup.net> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:55:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210127230934.1be87ddb@riseup.net> (raingloom@riseup.net's message of "Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:09:34 +0100") Message-ID: <87sg6c6lhz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46168 Cc: 46168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, raingloom skribis: > Try running `ssh example.com guix pull` or something else that uses > progress bars. You'll get an "Inappropriate ioctl for device" instead > of Guix simply doing the sensible thing: disabling progress bars. I can=E2=80=99t reproduce this with c852d897551f514de95c224fa79e748f4880806= 8. Specifically, =E2=80=98ssh HOST guix pull=E2=80=99 shows me the Git progres= s bar (while updating channels), and then there are no progress bars for downloads but dots instead (as expected). Which revision (as returned by =E2=80=98guix describe=E2=80=99) behaves lik= e this for you? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 06 21:22:10 2021 Received: (at 46168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2021 02:22:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46717 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8ZiE-0000WM-1U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:22:10 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8ZiC-0000WD-Dp for 46168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:22:09 -0500 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DYCbK5JptzDr2r; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 18:22:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1612664525; bh=qL7ZhHzDOzespRrjxsKoYC5E1GpPsvmDTdxzEX4out4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KLUmdOjjy8WhbrMScz8GOmfzvvHHgy7BI0MDg2dJcS0gI2f8P9qo+l7GdmwjalnMb vrSfhIdaoBZlLeFSsu6VtRG4SFngffKQrorbyZbUNKIQqoNGmpS19rNZRpbDc7YLOT vXiEU/pFY4GBDFqm9JDt0rHZIYK9m6NsP3jgc+6w= X-Riseup-User-ID: 5A8F8340D5989582CEB617D5701615ABD422694D6FF6B6325F36BA8C766DD2AC Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DYCbG6sJfz5vN7; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 18:22:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 01:48:44 +0100 From: raingloom To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= Subject: Re: bug#46168: terminal-window-size breaks with ssh Message-ID: <20210206014844.0f21d518@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <87sg6c6lhz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210127230934.1be87ddb@riseup.net> <87sg6c6lhz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46168 Cc: 46168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) On Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:55:04 +0100 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi, >=20 > raingloom skribis: >=20 > > Try running `ssh example.com guix pull` or something else that uses > > progress bars. You'll get an "Inappropriate ioctl for device" > > instead of Guix simply doing the sensible thing: disabling progress > > bars. =20 >=20 > I can=E2=80=99t reproduce this with c852d897551f514de95c224fa79e748f48808= 068. > Specifically, =E2=80=98ssh HOST guix pull=E2=80=99 shows me the Git progr= ess bar > (while updating channels), and then there are no progress bars for > downloads but dots instead (as expected). >=20 > Which revision (as returned by =E2=80=98guix describe=E2=80=99) behaves l= ike this for > you? >=20 > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. Of course it does work now. :D Looking at `guix pull --list-generations`, the last two before the bug are: Generation 6 Dec 13 2020 01:47:37 guix 1adeb74 Generation 7 Jan 23 2021 16:47:02 guix 0288e21 ...aaaand I can't see later ones because guix just got killed. Maybe the code that computes the differences between generations is not terribly memory efficient... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 09 03:32:17 2021 Received: (at 46168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 08:32:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52556 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORV-0005k6-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORT-0005ec-5i for 46168@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:16 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORN-0004Qe-SK; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:09 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60236 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORL-00043Q-0O; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:09 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: raingloom Subject: Re: bug#46168: terminal-window-size breaks with ssh References: <20210127230934.1be87ddb@riseup.net> <87sg6c6lhz.fsf@gnu.org> <20210206014844.0f21d518@riseup.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 =?utf-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:32:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210206014844.0f21d518@riseup.net> (raingloom@riseup.net's message of "Sat, 6 Feb 2021 01:48:44 +0100") Message-ID: <87v9b1vdyz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 46168 Cc: 46168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi, raingloom skribis: > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:55:04 +0100 > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Hi, >>=20 >> raingloom skribis: >>=20 >> > Try running `ssh example.com guix pull` or something else that uses >> > progress bars. You'll get an "Inappropriate ioctl for device" >> > instead of Guix simply doing the sensible thing: disabling progress >> > bars.=20=20 >>=20 >> I can=E2=80=99t reproduce this with c852d897551f514de95c224fa79e748f4880= 8068. >> Specifically, =E2=80=98ssh HOST guix pull=E2=80=99 shows me the Git prog= ress bar >> (while updating channels), and then there are no progress bars for >> downloads but dots instead (as expected). [...] > Of course it does work now. :D > Looking at `guix pull --list-generations`, the last two before the bug > are: > Generation 6 Dec 13 2020 01:47:37 > guix 1adeb74 > Generation 7 Jan 23 2021 16:47:02 > guix 0288e21 The problem you observed might have been fixed by d613c1771a1986d3c0f1e034155fde41f32f9b8e (Dec. 17, 2020). > ...aaaand I can't see later ones because guix just got killed. Maybe > the code that computes the differences between generations is not > terribly memory efficient... I=E2=80=99m not aware of that. Could you please report a new bug if you ha= ve more info? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 09 03:32:33 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 08:32:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORk-0005ng-U5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41148) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORj-0005nT-4G for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:31 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORd-0004Wj-Fe for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:25 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=60240 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l9ORc-0004y6-6i for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 03:32:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:32:23 +0100 Message-Id: <87tuqlvdyg.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #46168 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) tags 46168 fixed close 46168 quit From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:23:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 24 11:28:24 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 15:28:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIYLg-0004Fr-2G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:28:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:36108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIYLd-0004Fc-9l for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:28:22 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GvCg35N51zDy7S for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1629818895; bh=Uu6NFZGzkeqO/Ow1Iuqk7r5ghyYWCBi+V+BQMsrOUVE=; h=Date:From:To:From; b=B7teACZyB6TpyUv/LnLytkXwQUhPYb2qeuByLeLkMS0Nsz4xDNOx25Se0S/OYVgAf cZWefUayfcNsfYSRKuOTUOfWnp4ibYj+MwkzRglRA0knvfC81eHLv5ilYE2SyXMkqt hnMpz+Ox4ifr3YXPuMUWABJlQ35Wxhg7oDjKLzQQ= X-Riseup-User-ID: 97FE4D2287BBC7FA7797C61AED2E9A13CF9B785FB8174F42A5D4260FEACA0D9E Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GvCg270r7z20bK for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:28:00 +0200 From: raingloom To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <20210824172800.027312da@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: unarchive 46168 Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.252.153.129 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) unarchive 46168 From unknown Wed Jun 18 00:23:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator