GNU bug report logs - #46151
28.0.50; Set revert-buffer-function in shell command output buffers

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>

Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 06:23:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #64 received at 46151 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Michael Welsh Duggan <mwd <at> md5i.com>
Cc: 46151 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#46151: 28.0.50; Set revert-buffer-function in shell command
 output buffers
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 11:47:12 -0700
Hello,

On Sun 31 Jan 2021 at 08:37AM +01, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> This reminds me that I've often found it odd that there's no global
> binding for `revert-buffer' -- I think there should be, because it's
> such a useful command.
>
> Sean suggested `C-c C-r', which is nicely mnemonic, and is natural as a
> non-complicated alternative to `C-c C-f' when trying to reload a file
> (since `C-c C-f' has a lot of annoying DWIM stuff going on).

Well, C-c C-r is major mode territory, right?  So would not be suitable
for a global binding.

> Any opinions?

The C-x g suggestion from Juri seems the most reasonable so far.

To be honest I am inclined to agree with Drew that the command is not
worth a global binding.  Most people probably use it infrequently enough
in buffers where it does not have a local binding that they can just
access it with M-x, and those who do use it more frequently than average
can add a personal binding like C-c r.

-- 
Sean Whitton




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 106 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.