GNU bug report logs - #46036
fails do build on macos 10.7

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola <at> libero.it>

Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola <at> libero.it>
Subject: bug#46036: closed (Re: bug#46036: fails do build on macos 10.7)
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 22:17:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#46036: fails do build on macos 10.7

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 46036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
46036: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=46036
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 46036-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola <at> libero.it>
Subject: Re: bug#46036: fails do build on macos 10.7
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 22:15:57 +0000
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 08:34:00PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Cc: 46036 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > From: Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola <at> libero.it>
> > Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:32:17 +0100
> > 
> > > Is this change safe, or will we need another pretest to be sure?  I
> > > thought we could next go straight to a release candidate.
> > 
> > to my knowledge it is safe: it is really equivalent code, the new syntax 
> > is just a shortcut. A test on a newer MacOS is of course needed, I don't 
> > have one.
> 
> Thanks.

I agree that it's safe so I've pushed the change.
-- 
Alan Third

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mottola <at> libero.it>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: fails do build on macos 10.7
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:57:18 +0100
Compilation of 27.1 yields:
nsfns.m:496:33: error: unexpected type name 'BOOL': expected expression
  NSNumber *isUbiquitousItem = @YES;
                                ^
/usr/include/objc/objc.h:50:26: note: expanded from macro 'YES'
#define YES             (BOOL)1
                         ^

this code is guarded with MacOS 10.7, but the compiler doesn't like it.

It is as easy to write it old-style:
  NSNumber *isUbiquitousItem = [NSNumber numberWithBool:YES];

and emacs 27.1 happily running on Lion again.

Thanks




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 111 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.