GNU bug report logs - #45919
[PATCH 0/8] Exporting a manifest and channels from a profile

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 18:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel <at> gnu.org>, 45919 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#45919] [PATCH 0/8] Exporting a manifest and channels from a profile
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:25:54 +0100
Hi,

Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

[...]

>>   • The generated files might use APIs that, in the meantime, got
>>     deprecated or changed somehow.  This is in contrast with
>>     ‘--export-profile’, which interprets ‘manifest’ (a versioned file
>>     format) and produces code that can use the API du jour.
>
> /run/current-system/configuration.scm suffers from the same problem.

Not really because it’s precisely the file that you gave to build the
system.  So you know you can run:

  cd /run/current-system
  guix time-machine -C channels.scm -- system reconfigure configuration.scm

and it’ll work (modulo the documented caveats).

> But with the manifest we could do better, we could include a version
> number one way or another.
> Besides, since it comes together with channels.scm, we know which Guix
> was used, so we always have access to the Guix with the right API to
> install the manifest.

Right.

>>   • One would still have to learn about these two files, and pick the
>>     right “manifest” file.
>
> I think it would be easier than a command. See below.
>
>>   • For users of ‘-m my-manifest.scm’, we would need to store
>>     ‘my-manifest.scm’ as is instead of generating an approximation
>>     thereof.
>
> Which seems easy to do, isn't it?

I take it that you’re volunteering?  :-)

Nothing’s difficult, but in this case we’d need to pass the original
manifest down to ‘profile-generation’.  Requires some redesign.

> Another use-case which I find useful and comes close to this feature is
> that of channel/manifest versioning, in the sense of keeping these files
> under version control for instance in a Git repository.  This can be
> useful to keep the history of everything, even deleted generations, or
> even in case of hardware failure.
>
> To that end, it'd be nice if we could export these files automatically
> to a designated location.
>
> Example: I update ~/my-profile and it automatically produces / overwrite
> ~/repos/guix-profile-metadata.git/my-profile/channels.scm and
> ~/repos/guix-profile-metadata.git/my-profile/manifest.scm.
>
> This way I can commit these 2 files in my guix-profile-metadata.git
> repository.

I guess you could do that either with ‘cp
~/.guix-profile/{channels,manifest.scm …’ or with ‘guix package
--export-manifest … > …’.

But again, that’s not really the goal here.  The goal is to help users
willing to migrate from the “imperative” mode to the declarative mode.
Once you’re using a manifest, probably you’ll want to put that under
version control, but that’s already the case.

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 112 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.